Cited by 8Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Competence-building in adolescents, part II: community intervention for survivors of peer suicide

Sandor, M. Kay, Walker, Lorraine O., Sands, Dolores·1994·Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing

Abstract

Nurses often encounter situations in which they are called upon to assist in post-suicide community interventions with teachers, church youth group leaders, and mental health professionals. Controlled studies of interventions to aid adolescents coping with the loss of a peer are lacking. The purpose of this study, conditioned by an unanticipated suicide in an ongoing research study, was to document changes in psychosocial competence of adolescent peer suicide survivors. Following a supportive community intervention, the peer survivor group was compared with a similar group of adolescents who did not experience peer suicide. Both groups were in the control condition of a larger nursing study of social competence-building. The survivor group had significantly greater self-efficacy immediately after the community intervention and 2 months later when contrasted with the comparison group. In addition, the survivor group reported greater social acceptance and job competence immediately after the community intervention. Correlated t-tests showed the survivor group had significant gains in problem-solving appraisal and global self-worth after the community intervention, but significant declines in global self-worth and scholastic competence 2 months after the intervention. The findings support the belief that community interventions are initially worthwhile in helping adolescents to cope with peer suicide, but continued supportive intervention may be needed to offset declines noted over time in areas such as self-worth and academics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/01460869409078305

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandor, M. K., Walker, L. O., & Sands, D.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing
Published
1994-01
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
197-209
ISSN
  • 0146-0862 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-043X
OpenAlex
W2036502217
Cited by
8
References
19
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r21nr001316-03)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NR01316)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
peer suicide, community-based intervention, psychosocial skills, self-efficacy, social acceptance, job competence, global self-worth, problem-solving appraisal, scholastic competence, coping with loss, nursing interventions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Self Concept, Self-Help Groups, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review