Cited by 74Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Post-suicide Intervention Programs: A Systematic Review

Open access
Szumilas, Magdalena, Kutcher, Stan·2011·Canadian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objective The purposes of this study were: 1) to determine the effectiveness of suicide postvention programs on suicide attempts and suicide as well as grief symptoms, mental distress, and mental health broadly defined; and 2) to investigate their cost-effectiveness.Methods Computerized database searches (PubMed, PsycINFO, Cinahl, Cochrane Database, Crisis and Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior) were performed in September 2009 to obtain evaluations of suicide postvention programs and in February 2010 (Centre for Research and Dissemination Database, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cinahl) to obtain cost-effectiveness analyses of bereavement programs. Hand searches of relevant articles and reviews were also conducted. Publications were included in the analysis if they described an evaluation/cost-effectiveness analysis of a suicide postvention program, provided data, and were published in English-language peer-reviewed journals. There was no restriction on publication date. Studies were excluded if they were narrative systematic reviews or dissertations or if they described a postvention program but provided no evaluation. Because very few cost-effectiveness analyses were identified, articles describing "costs" of bereavement programs were also included. Studies were evaluated for quality using Centres for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence, and for program effectiveness using Office of Justice Programs "What Works Repository" Analytic Framework.Results Of the 49 studies of suicide postvention programs retrieved, 16 met inclusion criteria for evaluation of study quality and evidence of effectiveness. Three target populations for postvention programs were identified: school-based, family-focused, and community-based. No protective effect of any postvention program could be determined for number of suicide deaths or suicide attempts from the available studies. Few positive effects of school-based postvention programs were found. One study reported negative effects of a suicide postvention. Gatekeeper training for proactive postvention was effective in increasing knowledge pertaining to crisis intervention among school personnel. Outreach at the scene of suicide was found to be helpful in encouraging survivors to attend a support group at a crisis centre and seek help in dealing with their loss. Contact with a counseling postvention for familial survivors (spouses, parents, children) of suicide generally helped reduce psychological distress in the short term. There was no statistical analysis of community-based suicide postvention programs; however media guidelines for reporting of suicide and suicide attempts have been adopted by mental health organizations in numerous countries. No analyses of cost-effectiveness of suicide postvention programs were found.Conclusion Recommendations to provide guidance to policy-makers, administrators and clinicians are presented and directions for future research are outlined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03404872

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Langlois S, Morrison P. Suicide death and attempts. Health Reports 2002;13(2):9-22.
  2. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine -Levels of evidence [homepage on the Internet]. 2009. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025 (Accessed October 3, 2009).
  3. Etzersdorfer E, Sonneck G. Preventing suicide by influencing mass-media report- ing: The Viennese experience 1980-1996. Arch Suicide Res 1998;4(1):67-74.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szumilas, M., & Kutcher, S.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Public Health
Published
2011-01
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
18-19
ISSN
  • 0008-4263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1920-7476
OpenAlex
W2126009289
Cited by
74
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicide postvention, suicide prevention programs, suicide attempts, grief symptoms, bereavement, cost-effectiveness, gatekeeper training, crisis intervention, program effectiveness, crisis centers
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Canada, Child, Community Mental Health Services, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Grief, Health Promotion, Humans, School Health Services, Self-Help Groups, Program Evaluation, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review