The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Definitions of women's sexual dysfunction reconsidered: Advocating expansion and revision
Abstract
In light of various shortcomings of the traditional nosology of women's sexual disorders for both clinical practice and research, an international multi-disciplinary group has reviewed the evidence for traditional assumptions about women's sexual response. It is apparent that fullfilment of sexual desire is an uncommon reason/incentive for sexual activity for many women and, in fact, sexual desire is frequently experienced only after sexual stimuli have elicited subjective sexual arousal. The latter is often poorly correlated with genital vasocongestion. Complaints of lack of subjective arousal despite apparently normal genital vasocongestion are common. Based on the review of existing evidence-based research, many modifications to the definitions of women's sexual dysfunctions are recommended. There is a new definition of sexual interest/desire disorder, sexual arousal disorders are separated into genital and subjective subtypes and the recently recognized condition of persistent sexual arousal is included. The definition of dyspareunia reflects the possibility of the pain precluding intercourse. The anticipation and fear of pain characteristic of vaginismus is noted while the assumed muscular spasm is omitted given the lack of evidence. Finally, a recommendation is made that all diagnoses be accompanied by descriptors relating to associated contextual factors and to the degree of distress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The female sexual response: a different model
Basson, R. (2000) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/009262300278641 · Cited by 995
Self-citationDistress about sex: a national survey of women in heterosexual relationships.
Bancroft, J., Loftus, J., & Long, J. S. (2003) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1023420431760 · Cited by 774
Sexual Motivation and the Duration of Partnership
Klusmann, D. (2002) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1015205020769 · Cited by 340
Steroid hormones, the menopause, sexuality and well-being of women
Cawood, E. H. H., & Bancroft, J. (1996) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700035261 · Cited by 225
Cited by
Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders
Lee, P. A., Houk, C. P., Ahmed, S. F., Hughes, I. A., & in collaboration with the participants in the International Consensus Conference on Intersex organized by the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society and the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0738 · Cited by 2,324
Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders
Hughes, I. A., Houk, C., Ahmed, S. F., & Lee, P. A. (2006) · Journal of Pediatric Urology · doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.03.004 · Cited by 684
Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis.
Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9556-9 · Cited by 584
“…did find VPA differences between subgroups of women with and without female sexual arousal disorder, using the newer sexual dysfunction definitions (Basson et al., 2003) discriminating between women reporting absent or impaired genital sexual arousal (genital sexual arousal disorder), women…”
Revised Definitions of Women's Sexual Dysfunction
Basson, R., Leiblum, S., Brotto, L., Derogatis, L., Fourcroy, J., Fugl-Meyer, K., Graziottin, A., Heiman, J. R., Laan, E., Meston, C., et al. (2004) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10107.x · Cited by 455
Self-citationLeiblum, S. R., Koochaki, P. E., Rodenberg, C. A., Barton, I. P., & Rosen, R. C. (2006) · Menopause · doi:10.1097/01.gme.0000172596.76272.06 · Cited by 444
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Basson, R., Leiblum, S., Brotto, L., Derogatis, L., Fourcroy, J., Fugl-Meyer, K., Graziottin, A., Heiman, J. R., Laan, E., Meston, C., Schover, L., van Lankveld, J., & Schultz, W. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 221-229
- ISSN
- 0167-482X (ISSN-L)
- 1743-8942
- OpenAlex
- W2107116520
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Definitions of women's sexual dysfunction reconsidered: Advocating expansion and revision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/01674820309074686
- The paper
- Basson, R., Leiblum, S., Brotto, L., Derogatis, L., Fourcroy, J., Fugl-Meyer, K., Graziottin, A., Heiman, J. R., Laan, E., Meston, C., Schover, L., van Lankveld, J., & Schultz, W. W. (2003). Definitions of women's sexual dysfunction reconsidered: Advocating expansion and revision. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674820309074686
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.