The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Health Council of the Netherlands: No need to change from SAR to time-temperature relation in electromagnetic fields exposure limits
Open accessAbstract
The Health Council of the Netherlands (HCN) and other organisations hold the basic assumption that induced electric current and the generation and absorption of heat in biological material caused by radiofrequency electromagnetic fields are the only causal effects with possible adverse consequences for human health that have been scientifically established to date. Hence, the exposure guidelines for the 10 MHz-10 GHz frequency range are based on avoiding adverse effects of increased temperatures that may occur of the entire human body at a specific absorption rate (SAR) level above 4 W/kg. During the workshop on Thermal Aspects of Radio Frequency Exposure on 11-12 January 2010 in Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, the question was raised whether there would be a practical advantage in shifting from expressing the exposure limits in SAR to expressing them in terms of a maximum allowable temperature increase. This would mean defining adverse time-temperature thresholds. In this paper, the HCN discusses the need for this, considering six points: consistency, applicability, quantification, causality, comprehensibility and acceptability. The HCN concludes that it seems unlikely that a change of dosimetric quantity will help us forward in the discussion on the scientific controversies regarding the existence or non-existence of non-thermal effects in humans following long duration, low intensity exposure to electromagnetic fields. Therefore, the HCN favours maintaining the current approach of basic restrictions and reference levels being expressed as SAR and in V/m or µT, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., & Daily, G. C. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x · Cited by 1,275
Polysaccharide Conjugate Vaccine against Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Adults
Bonten, M. J. M., Huijts, S. M., Bolkenbaas, M., Webber, C., Patterson, S., Gault, S., van Werkhoven, C. H., van Deursen, A. M. M., Sanders, E. A. M., Verheij, T. J. M., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1408544 · Cited by 1,248
Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for protein
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, N. A. A. (. (2012) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2557 · Cited by 739
Folic Acid Food Fortification—Its History, Effect, Concerns, and Future Directions
Crider, K. S., Bailey, L. B., & Berry, R. J. (2011) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu3030370 · Cited by 608
Health Benefits of Nature Experience: Psychological, Social and Cultural Processes
Hartig, T., van den Berg, A. E., Hagerhall, C. M., Tomalak, M., Bauer, N., Hansmann, R., Ojala, A., Syngollitou, E., Carrus, G., van Herzele, A., et al. (2011) · Forests, Trees and Human Health · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9806-1_5 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- van Rhoon, G. C., Aleman, A., Kelfkens, G., Kromhout, H., Van Leeuwen, F. E., Savelkoul, H. F. J., Wadman, W. J., Van De Weerdt, R. D. H. J., Zwamborn, A. P. M., Van Rongen, E., & Committe, T. E. F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Hyperthermia
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-05-18
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 399-404
- ISSN
- 0265-6736 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5157
- OpenAlex
- W2154914850
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 49.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health Council of the Netherlands: No need to change from SAR to time-temperature relation in electromagnetic fields exposure limits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/02656736.2010.534528
- The paper
- van Rhoon, G. C., Aleman, A., Kelfkens, G., Kromhout, H., Van Leeuwen, F. E., Savelkoul, H. F. J., Wadman, W. J., Van De Weerdt, R. D. H. J., Zwamborn, A. P. M., Van Rongen, E., & Committe, T. E. F. (2011). Health Council of the Netherlands: No need to change from SAR to time-temperature relation in electromagnetic fields exposure limits. International Journal of Hyperthermia. https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2010.534528
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.