Cited by 35Pituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Incidence of pituitary dysfunction following traumatic brain injury: A prospective study from a regional neurosurgical centre

Alavi, Seyed Alireza, Tan, Chin Lik, Menon, David K., Simpson, Helen L., Hutchinson, Peter J.·2016·British Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) may develop pituitary dysfunction. Although, there is now increasing awareness of and investigations into such post-traumatic hypopituitarism (PTHP), the exact prevalence and incidence remain uncertain. Here, we aim to identify the incidence of PTHP in a selected population of TBI patients deemed at risk of PTHP at a regional neurosurgical centre in the UK. A total of 105 patients have been assessed in two cohorts: (i) 58 patients in serial cohort and (ii) 47 patients in cross-sectional late cohort. We found that in serial cohort, 10.3% (6/58) of TBI patients had abnormalities of the pituitary-adrenal axis in the acute phase (Day 0-7 post injury). In comparison, in cross-sectional late cohort, 21.3% (10/47) of the patients developed dysfunction in at least one of their pituitary axes at 6 months or more post-TBI, with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism being the most common. Twenty-two patients from these two cohorts had their growth hormone assessment at 12 months or more post-TBI and 9.1% (2/22) were found to have growth hormone deficiency. Our results suggest that PTHP is a common condition amongst sufferers of TBI, and appropriate measures should be taken to detect and manage it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/02688697.2015.1109060

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alavi, S. A., Tan, C. L., Menon, D. K., Simpson, H. L., & Hutchinson, P. J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Hutchinson, Peter J.
Venue
British Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2015-11-26
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
302-306
ISSN
  • 0268-8697 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-046X
OpenAlex
W2179155710
Cited by
35
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10090, NIHR-RP-R3-12-013)
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  • NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic hypopituitarism, pituitary dysfunction, incidence, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, growth hormone deficiency, pituitary-adrenal axis
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Hypopituitarism, Male, Middle Aged, Pituitary Diseases, Prospective Studies, Incidence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review