Cited by 73Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Prevalence of posttraumatic growth hormone deficiency is highly dependent on the diagnostic set-up: results from The Danish National Study on Posttraumatic Hypopituitarism

Open access
Klose, Marianne, Stochholm, Kirstine, Janukonyté, Jourgita, Lehman Christensen, Louise, Frystyk, Jan, Andersen, Marianne, Laurberg, Peter, Christiansen, Jens Sandahl +1 more·2014·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Recent international guidelines suggest pituitary screening in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Predominantly isolated GH deficiency (GHD) was reported in the literature, raising the question of potential methodological bias. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the prevalence of GHD in patients admitted in 2008 with TBI, with concurrent assessment of methodological bias. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study at tertiary referral university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were Danish patients with a head trauma diagnosis from the Danish Board of Health diagnostic code registry; 439 patients and 124 healthy controls underwent dynamic assessment of GH secretion 2.5 years (median) after TBI. MAIN OUTCOME: We evaluated the prevalence of GHD given use of 1) local versus guideline cutoffs, 2) insulin tolerance test (ITT), pyridostigmine (PD)-GHRH or GHRH-arginine (arg) test, 3) single versus repeated testing, and 4) GH assessment by assays with different isoform specificities. RESULTS: The prevalence of GHD was lower by local than by guideline cutoffs (12% vs 19% [PD-GHRH/GHRH-arg, P<.001]; 4.5% vs 5% [ITT, P=.9]), and by ITT than by PD-GHRH/GHRH-arg (P=.006 [local cutoffs]; P<.001 [guideline cutoffs]). Only 1% of patients had GHD according to 2 tests. GH assessment by the Immulite or iSYS assay caused no significant diagnostic differences. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed a high risk of bias in the management of pituitary testing of patients with TBI and stresses the importance of a proper control group and stringent GH testing including confirmatory testing in cohorts with low a priori likelihood of GHD such as in TBI. Our results question the evidence for newly introduced recommendations for routine pituitary assessment in TBI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2013-2397

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of GHD defined by local cutoffs was 11.8%; when applying the national Danish criteria, incidence increased to 18.9%.

    “The prevalence defined by local cutoffs was 11.8%; when applying the national Danish criteria, incidence increased to 18.9%.”

    From Update of Endocrine Dysfunction following Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury (2015) · cites this paper as [60]

    The 'Impact of local vs guideline-derived cutoff values' section reports GHD prevalence of 11.8% with local cutoffs and 18.9% with guideline cutoffs, but only among patients assessed by a combined test; the ITT results were different. The 'Diagnostic criteria for GHD' and 'Diagnostic thresholds' sections identify the comparison cutoffs as drawn from international guidelines, not national Danish criteria. The paper also reports prevalence, not incidence. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The incidence of GHD using insulin tolerance testing (local criteria ≤2.6, national criteria ≤3 mcg/L) was similar at 5%.

    “In contrast, the incidence of GHD using Insulin tolerance testing (local criteria ≤2.6, national criteria of ≤3 mcg/L) was similar at 5%.”

    From Update of Endocrine Dysfunction following Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury (2015) · cites this paper as [60]

    The 'Impact of local vs guideline-derived cutoff values' section reports GHD prevalence of 4.5% with the local ITT cutoff and 5.0% with the guideline cutoff. The 'Local cutoff values' and 'Diagnostic criteria' sections give those cutoffs as 2.6 and 3 µg/L. The figures support the comparison, but the paper reports prevalence, not incidence. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The PD-GHRH stimulation test is not commonly used in the diagnosis of adult GHD and is not well-standardized.

    “The limitations of this study were that the PD-GHRH stimulation test is not a commonly used test in the diagnosis of adult GHD (21), and it is not well-standardized (22).”

    From Pituitary Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Clinical and Pathophysiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Diagnostic thresholds section (page unavailable) says definite BMI-related cutoffs for the PD-GHRH test are unavailable and that adapting cutoffs from another test was inappropriate, supporting the concern about standardization. The Methods section describes its use in this study, but the paper does not establish that PD-GHRH is uncommon in adult GHD diagnosis generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • False-positive results after GH testing occurred in 2-8% of controls, depending on the tests and cutoffs used.

    “Additionally, Klose et al (21) showed that false-positive results after GH testing occurred in 2-8% of controls, depending on the tests and cutoffs used.”

    From Pituitary Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Clinical and Pathophysiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as [21]

    The 'Impact of local vs guideline-derived cutoff values' section reports false-positive GH-deficiency results in healthy controls that varied by test and cutoff. But it gives 4% for ITT and up to 20% for combined tests under guideline cutoffs, so the claimed 2–8% range is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Comparing national and local criteria, the prevalence of GHD varied more using combined testing: insulin tolerance test (ITT); pyridostigmine-GHRH or GHRH-Arginine agents.

    “Comparing national and local criteria, the prevalence of GHD varied more using combined testing: insulin tolerance test (ITT); pyridostigmine-GHRH or GHRH-Arginine agents.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klose, M., Stochholm, K., Janukonyté, J., Lehman Christensen, L., Frystyk, J., Andersen, M., Laurberg, P., Christiansen, J. S., & Feldt-Rasmussen, U.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Klose, Marianne
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2014-01
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
101-110
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2066340447
Cited by
73
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Gentofte Hospital
  • Lundbeckfonden
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Rigshospitalet
  • Region Hovedstaden
  • A.P. Møller og Hustru Chastine Mc-Kinney Møllers Fond til almene Formaal
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Fonden til Lægevidenskabens Fremme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, insulin tolerance test, GHRH-arginine test, diagnostic thresholds, methodological bias, prevalence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brain Injuries, Denmark, Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine, Female, Humans, Hypopituitarism, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies, Human Growth Hormone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review