The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speech and pause characteristics in multiple sclerosis: A preliminary study of speakers with high and low neuropsychological test performance
Open accessAbstract
This preliminary study investigated how cognitive-linguistic status in multiple sclerosis (MS) is reflected in two speech tasks (i.e. oral reading, narrative) that differ in cognitive-linguistic demand. Twenty individuals with MS were selected to comprise High and Low performance groups based on clinical tests of executive function and information processing speed and efficiency. Ten healthy controls were included for comparison. Speech samples were audio-recorded and measures of global speech timing were obtained. Results indicated predicted differences in global speech timing (i.e. speech rate and pause characteristics) for speech tasks differing in cognitive-linguistic demand, but the magnitude of these task-related differences was similar for all speaker groups. Findings suggest that assumptions concerning the cognitive-linguistic demands of reading aloud as compared to spontaneous speech may need to be re-considered for individuals with cognitive impairment. Qualitative trends suggest that additional studies investigating the association between cognitive-linguistic and speech motor variables in MS are warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All participants demonstrated hearing thresholds at 40 dB or lower in at least one ear for octave frequencies between 250 and 4000 Hz.
“All participants demonstrated hearing thresholds at 40 dB or lower in at least one ear for octave frequencies between 250 and 4000 Hz (Feenaughty et al., 2013).”
From Respiratory Responses to Two Voice Interventions for Parkinson's Disease (2022) · cites this paper as Feenaughty et al., 2013
The Method > Participants passage says all participants passed a 40 dB hearing screening in at least one ear at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. It does not report testing at 250 Hz, so the claimed frequency range is not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System
Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2012) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t15082-000 · Cited by 2,683
Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion
Gronwall, D. M. A. (1977) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367 · Cited by 2,395 · cited 5×
“Three tests of the MACFIMS, including the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS), the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test – three second version (PASAT3) and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), were used to index cognitive ability.”
MethodInfluentialUsing uh and um in spontaneous speaking
Clark, H. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00017-3 · Cited by 1,235
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 71
- 10.1076/1380-3395(200010)22:5;1-9;FT686 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355617708080508 · DOI
- 10.1080/02687039708249422 · DOI
- Bayles K. A., 1993, The Arizona battery for communication disorders of Dementia
- 10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0087) · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460103020 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355617700000989 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-2006-956758 · DOI
- 10.1076/clin.16.3.381.13859 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355617710000688 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.61 · DOI
- Brown G., 1980, Questions of intonation
- 10.1007/BF00342238 · DOI
- 10.1044/jshr.1202.246 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/020) · DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/096) · DOI
- Duffy J. R., 2005, Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management
- 10.1177/002383096100400305 · DOI
- Goldman-Eisler F., 1968, Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech
- 10.1159/000021531 · DOI
- Henderson A., 1965, Language and Speech, 8, 236, 10.1177/002383096500800405 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.006 · DOI
- 10.1044/jshr.3003.351 · DOI
- 10.1016/0167-6393(91)90039-V · DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0184) · DOI
- 10.1017/S0954394509990093 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.3459842 · DOI
- 10.1006/brln.2001.2602 · DOI
- Kent R. D., 2004, Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech, 3, 10.1093/oso/9780198526261.003.0001 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0019222 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520280085020 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-510X(96)00146-3 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328346a43b · DOI
- 10.1037/h0082683 · DOI
- Lethlean J. B., 2000, Speech and language disorders in multiple sclerosis, 155
- 10.1017/S0140525X99001776 · DOI
- Lowit A., 2006, Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 253
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.024 · DOI
- 10.1080/13682820802697879 · DOI
- 10.1044/jslhr.4302.560 · DOI
- van der Merwe, A. (2009). A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.),Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders(pp. 3–18). New York: Thieme.
- Murdoch B. E., 2000, Speech and language disorders in multiple sclerosis, 109
- 10.1017/S1355617709990750 · DOI
- 10.1097/00019052-199506000-00010 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0082757 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01067111 · DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/06-0222) · DOI
- Schiffer R. B., 1999, Multiple sclerosis in clinical practice
- Smith A., 1982, Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) manual (revised).
- 10.1080/13803390601064493 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458509106615 · DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/008) · DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/077) · DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/058) · DOI
- 10.3109/02699206.2010.520185 · DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/083) · DOI
- 10.1044/jshr.3606.1134 · DOI
- Van Lancker Sidtis D., 2004, Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 207
- 10.1159/000265879 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90163-5 · DOI
- 10.1159/000316976 · DOI
- 10.1159/000052649 · DOI
- Westbury J. R., 1993, Annual Bulletin of the Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 1993, 13
- 10.1044/jshr.3801.124 · DOI
- 10.1044/jshr.3703.535 · DOI
- Yorkston K. M., 1984, Assessment of intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
- Yorkston K. M., 2011, Management of motor speech disorders in children and adults
- Yorkston K., 1996, Sentence intelligibility test.
- Yorkston K. M., 2003, Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 73
- 10.1044/1058-0360(2001/013) · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Richardson, K., Huber, J. E., Kiefer, B., & Snyder, S. (2022) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00026 · Cited by 9
Respiratory Responses to Two Voice Interventions for Parkinson's Disease
Richardson, K., Huber, J. E., Kiefer, B., Kane, C., & Snyder, S. (2022) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00262 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Feenaughty, L., Tjaden, K., Benedict, R. H. B., & Weinstock-Guttman, B.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feenaughty, Lynda
- Venue
- Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-01-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-151
- ISSN
- 0269-9206 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5076
- PMC
- PMC5554953
- OpenAlex
- W2011322433
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC004689, R01DC004689-08S)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, speech rate, executive function, processing speed, reading aloud, narrative speech, cognitive impairment, speech timing, neuropsychological performance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition, Dysarthria, Female, Humans, Linguistics, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Reaction Time, Reading, Speech, Speech Acoustics, Speech Production Measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
