Cited by 67Ocular Surface and Contact LensFatty Acid Research and HealthAcne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Omega 3 Fatty Acids in Rosacea Patients with Dry Eye Symptoms

Bhargava, Rahul, Chandra, Mini, Bansal, Utsav, Singh, Divya, Ranjan, Somesh, Sharma, Shalini·2016·Current Eye Research

Abstract

Objective or purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of dietary omega-3 fatty acids (O3FAs) in rosacea patients having dry eye symptoms. METHODS: A prospective, interventional, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multi-centric study was done. Symptomatic patients with rosacea were recruited based on their response to (Dry Eye Scoring System, DESS©); a score of 0-3 was assigned to dry eye-related symptoms like ocular fatigue, blurring of vision, itching or burning, sandy or gritty sensation, and redness, respectively (DESS©). Subjects were (n = 130) were randomized to receive either O3FAs (n = 65) or placebo (n = 65) capsules (olive oil) twice daily for 6 months. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Change in subjective dry eye symptoms was the primary outcome measure. Change in meibomian gland score (MGS), Schirmer score, and tear film breakup time (TBUT) were the secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that there was a significant (p < 0.001) change in symptoms (F(1.506, 88.825 = 315.193), MGS (F(1.336, 78.796 = 84.438), Schirmer score (F(1.322, 78.022 = 86.559), and TBUT (F(1.354, 79.898 = 179.020.559) in O3FA group as compared to placebo group. Post-hoc test revealed that there was a significant change in dry eye symptoms at all points of time; there was a significant change in MGS, Schirmer score, and TBUT also, but only after 3 months of intervention. Linear regression established that symptom severity could signific…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/02713683.2015.1122810

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aside from several large trials conducted in India by Bhargava et al., previous clinical trials involved fewer than 125 total patients.

    “Aside from several large trials that were conducted in India by Bhargava et al.,15–18 the previous clinical trials involved fewer than 125 total patients.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhargava, R., Chandra, M., Bansal, U., Singh, D., Ranjan, S., & Sharma, S.
Affiliations
  • Sharda University (IN)
  • Department of Ophthalmology, Laser Eye Clinic, Noida, India
Corresponding author
Bhargava, Rahul
Venue
Current Eye Research
Published
2016-04-06
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
1274-1280
ISSN
  • 0271-3683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2202
OpenAlex
W2321640631
Cited by
67
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Eye Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, rosacea, dry eye symptoms, dietary supplementation, meibomian gland dysfunction, tear film break-up time, Schirmer test, ocular surface disease
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Rosacea, Tears, Dry Eye Syndromes, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review