Cited by 35Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and Access

Treatment decisions on antidepressants in nursing homes: a qualitative study

Open access
Iden, Kristina Riis, Hjørleifsson, Stefan, Ruths, Sabine·2011·Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore decision-making on treatment with antidepressants among doctors and nurses in nursing homes. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: A qualitative study based on interviews with three focus groups comprising eight physicians engaged full time, eight physicians engaged part time, and eight registered nurses, respectively. The interview guide comprised questions on initiating, evaluating, and withdrawing treatment with antidepressants. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed by systematic text condensation. RESULTS: The first theme was the diagnostic process. The informants expressed difficulty in differentiating between depression and sorrow resulting from loss in old age. Further, the doctors reported that they relied on nurses' observations and rarely carried out systematic diagnostic work and follow-up of patients with depression. The second theme was treatment. Antidepressants were usually the only type of treatment provided, and patients were kept on medication even though staff felt uncertain whether this was effective. The third theme was who really determines the treatment. Registered nurses reported that unskilled and auxiliary nursing staff requested drug treatment, and doctors felt some pressure from the nurses to prescribe antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the quality of diagnosis and treatment for depression in nursing homes needs to be improved in Norway. Doctors should be more available and take responsibility and leadership in medical decisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/02813432.2011.628240

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most frequent indications for psychotropic prescribing were depression in nine studies, sleeping disorders in seven and anxiety in six.

    “The most frequent indications for psychotropic prescribing were depression in nine studies [50, 51, 55, 56, 60, 62, 73, 74, 82], sleeping disorders in seven [54–56, 59, 63, 74, 82] and anxiety in six [54–56, 73, 74, 82].”
  • Findings suggested differences between healthcare professional groups with nurses seeming more likely than doctors to encourage use of psychotropic medicines in some situations.

    “Findings also suggested differences between healthcare professional groups with nurses seeming more likely than doctors to encourage use of psychotropic medicines in some situations [62, 81].”
  • Nurses were identified as the main driver of prescribing.

    “Nurses were identified as the main driver of prescribing [49, 62, 81].”
  • Doctors and nurses were of the view that assessing whether psychotropic medication was appropriate in older people was challenging.

    “Doctors and nurses were of the view that assessing whether psychotropic medication was appropriate in older people was challenging [49, 53–56, 62, 65, 80–82].”
  • Difficulties identified included establishing a clear diagnosis, communication difficulties and increased sensitivity to the side effects of psychotropic medication in older people.

    “Difficulties that were identified included: establishing a clear diagnosis [56, 62], communication difficulties [56, 80] and the increased sensitivity to the side effects of psychotropic medication in older people.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iden, K. R., Hjørleifsson, S., & Ruths, S.
Affiliations
University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Iden, Kristina Riis
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Published
2011-11-29
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
252-256
ISSN
  • 0281-3432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-7724
OpenAlex
W2016720951
Cited by
35
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
antidepressants, nursing homes, geriatric depression, treatment decision-making, nurse-physician relationship, diagnostic uncertainty, drug withdrawal, quality of care
MeSH terms
Workforce, Antidepressive Agents, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Decision Making, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Nurses, Nursing Homes, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review