Effectiveness of two preventive interventions for coronary heart disease in primary care
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: 1. To compare a patient-centred, self-directive intervention with conventional care; 2. To evaluate longitudinal within-group changes of coronary heart disease risk. METHODS: Risk factor changes were evaluated in 110 men with high coronary heart disease risk attending a one year intervention study in general practice. The 22 participating general practice centres were randomly allocated to follow either a patient-centred, self-directive intervention or a conventional approach. RESULTS: No significant between-group differences were found in any single risk factor or in the combined risk of coronary heart disease. The improvement of total risk from screening time to conclusion of the study corresponded with changes of relative risks of CHD to 0.64 (95% CI: 0.54-0.77) and 0.65 (0.54-0.77) in the patient-centred, self-directive and the conventional care group respectively (p < 0.0001 in both groups). CONCLUSION: Everyday general practice clinical work seems as efficacious as a specific intervention method based on currently advocated behaviour change principles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Seven RCTs reported non-significant improvements in self-efficacy.
“Seven RCTs reported non-significant improvements in self-efficacy”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [78]
Changes in perceived self-efficacy were reported in 14 studies.
“Changes in perceived self-efficacy were reported in 14 studies”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [78]
Meland 1997 found no significant benefit of the intervention in any of the four health status outcomes it reported.
“Conversely, Bieber 2008 and Meland 1997 found no significant benefit of the intervention in any of the four outcomes on health status they each reported.”
From Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations (2012) · cites this paper as Meland 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations
Dwamena, F., Holmes-Rovner, M., Gaulden, C. M., Jorgenson, S., Sadigh, G., Sikorskii, A., Lewin, S., Smith, R. C., Coffey, J., Olomu, A., et al. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003267.pub2 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Dineen-Griffin, S., Garcia-Cardenas, V., Williams, K., & Benrimoj, S. I. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220116 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
“Seven RCTs reported non-significant improvements in self-efficacy [54, 57, 59, 68, 69, 77, 78, 98, 102, 105, 110, 111, 116].”
BackgroundGriffin, S. J. (2004) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.142 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease
Ebrahim, S. B. J., Taylor, F. C., Ward, K. J., Beswick, A. D., Burke, M., & Smith, G. D. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001561.pub3 · Cited by 552 · see citing works
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations
Lewin, S., Skea, Z., Entwistle, V. A., Zwarenstein, M., & Dick, J. (2001) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003267 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Multiple behavioral risk factor interventions in primary care
Goldstein, M. G., Whitlock, E. P., & DePue, J. (2004) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.023 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease
Krogsbøll, L. T., Jørgensen, K. J., Grønhøj, C., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009009.pub2 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Ketola, E., Sipilä, R., & Mäkelä, M. (2000) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.3109/07853890009011767 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Hsiao, A., Wong, M. D., Kanouse, D. E., Collins, R. L., Liu, H., Andersen, R., Gifford, A. L., McCutchan, A., Bozzette, S. A., Shapiro, M. F., et al. (2003) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/00126334-200306010-00007 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease
Ebrahim, S. B. J., Beswick, A. D., Burke, M., & Smith, G. D. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001561.pub2 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Thompson, R. L., Summerbell, C. D., Hooper, L., Higgins, J. P. T., Little, P. S., Talbot, D., & Ebrahim, S. B. J. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001366 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Alageel, S., Gulliford, M. C., McDermott, L. M., & Wright, A. J. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015375 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
JCS 2023 Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease
Fujiyoshi, A., Kohsaka, S., Hata, J., Hara, M., Kai, H., Masuda, D., Miyamatsu, N., Nishio, Y., Ogura, M., Sata, M., et al. (2024) · Circulation Journal · doi:10.1253/circj.cj-23-0285 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease using validated risk scores: A systematic review
Willis, A., Davies, M. J., Yates, T. E., et al. (2012) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1258/jrsm.2012.110193 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
The importance of self-efficacy in cardiovascular risk factor change
Meland, E., Mæland, J. G., & LÆRUM, E. (1999) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/14034948990270011001 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationA 41-Year-Old African American Man With Poorly Controlled Hypertension
Cooper, L. A. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.358 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Ketola, E., Mākelä, M., & Klockars, M. (2001) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Meland, E., L�rum, E., & M�land, J. G. (1996) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf00433919 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationTwo Valid Measures of Self-rated Physical Activity and Capacity
Holen, M. S., Een, R., Mildestvedt, T., Eide, G. E., & Meland, E. (2012) · The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal · doi:10.2174/1874192401206010156 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationAdherence in the Management of Chronic Disorders
Dunbar‐Jacob, J. M., Schlenk, E. A., & Caruthers, D. (2002) · doi:10.1002/9780470693513.ch4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Motivating cardiac rehabilitation patients to maintain lifestyle changes
Mildestvedt, T. (2008) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Segal, L., Dalton, A., Robertson, I. K., Scollo, M., Lal, A., Simms, J., Fawcett, J., Gates, J., Shand, F., Mattick, R. P., et al. (2006)
Fogel, J. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0195-4_42
- Authors
- Meland, E., Lærum, E., & Ulvik, R. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-63
- ISSN
- 0281-3432 (ISSN-L)
- 1502-7724
- OpenAlex
- W2108322290
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Keywords
- coronary heart disease prevention, behavior change, cardiovascular risk factors, general practice, usual care comparison, risk factor control, intervention effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Coronary Disease, Diet, Family Practice, Health Education, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Dropouts, Risk, Risk Factors, Self Care, Smoking, Health Behavior, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review