The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automatic exposure control in computed tomography – an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers
Abstract
Background: Today, practically all computed tomography (CT) systems are delivered with automatic exposure control (AEC) systems operating with tube current modulation in three dimensions. Each of these systems has different specifications and operates somewhat differently. Purpose: To evaluate AEC systems from four different CT scanner manufacturers: General Electric (GE), Philips, Siemens, and Toshiba, considering their potential for reducing radiation exposure to the patient while maintaining adequate image quality. Material and Methods: The dynamics (adaptation along the longitudinal axis) of tube current modulation of each AEC system were investigated by scanning an anthropomorphic chest phantom using both 16- and 64-slice CT scanners from each manufacturer with the AEC systems activated and inactivated. The radiation dose was estimated using the parameters in the DICOM image information and image quality was evaluated based on image noise (standard deviation of CT numbers) calculated in 0.5 cm 2 circular regions of interest situated throughout the spine region of the chest phantom. Results: We found that tube current modulation dynamics were similar among the different AEC systems, especially between GE and Toshiba systems and between Philips and Siemens systems. Furthermore, the magnitude of the reduction in the exposure dose was considerable, in the range of 35–60%. However, in general the image noise increased when the AEC systems were used, especially in regions where the tube current was greatly decreased, such as the lung region. However, the variation in image noise among images obtained along the scanning direction was lower when using the AEC systems compared with fixed mAs. Conclusion: The AEC systems available in modern CT scanners can contribute to a significant reduction in radiation exposure to the patient and the image noise becomes more uniform within any given scan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ohno, Y., Takenaka, D., Kanda, T., Yoshikawa, T., Matsumoto, S., Sugihara, N., & Sugimura, K. (2012) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.11.8275 · Cited by 79
Relationships of radiation dose indices with body size indices in adult body computed tomography
Inoue, Y., Itoh, H., Nagahara, K., Hata, H., & Mitsui, K. (2023) · Tomography · doi:10.3390/tomography9040110 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Söderberg, M., & Gunnarsson, M.
- Venue
- Acta Radiologica
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 625-634
- ISSN
- 0284-1851 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0455
- OpenAlex
- W1982060149
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic exposure control in computed tomography – an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/02841851003698206
- The paper
- Söderberg, M., & Gunnarsson, M. (2010). Automatic exposure control in computed tomography – an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. Acta Radiologica. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841851003698206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.