Cited by 32Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetry

Age estimation in fossil hominins: comparing dental development in early Homo with modern humans

Dean, M. Christopher, Liversidge, Helen M.·2015·Annals of Human Biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have used molar tooth eruption as a comparative marker of maturation in early fossil hominins. However, tooth eruption and tooth formation are independent maturational processes. AIM: To determine whether estimates of age for entering a stage of dental development in three early hominin fossils fell within the distribution of a modern human sample. METHODS: This study used a comparative model of dental development to identify the stages of dental development most likely to provide information about length of the growth period in early fossil hominins. Age estimates for stages of dental development in fossils were superimposed onto a normal distribution of the same radiographically defined stages derived from a sample of 6540 children of diverse geographical origin. RESULTS: Both within the dentition of S7-37, from Sangiran, Java, but also for stages of two other specimens (KNM-WT 15000 from Kenya and StW 151 from South Africa), all age estimates for later stages of tooth formation fell within the modern sample range. CONCLUSIONS: A pattern appears to exist in early Homo where, both within and between developing dentitions, age estimates for stages of P4, M2 and M3 tooth formation fell consistently among the more advanced individuals of the modern human sample.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/03014460.2015.1046488

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Homo erectus juvenile aged between 7.6 and 8.8 years (KNM WT 15000) shows evidence of both advanced dental development and earlier attainment of body mass and stature than is typical of modern humans of a similar age.

    “A Homo erectus juvenile aged between 7.6 to 8.8 years (KNM WT 15000) shows evidence of both advanced dental development and earlier attainment of body mass and stature than is typical of modern humans of a similar age (22,27).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dean, M. C., & Liversidge, H. M.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Venue
Annals of Human Biology
Published
2015-07-04
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
415-429
ISSN
  • 0301-4460 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5033
OpenAlex
W2215959973
Cited by
32
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
16.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Human Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
age estimation, fossil hominins, early Homo, tooth development, tooth eruption, growth period
MeSH terms
Age Determination by Teeth, Animals, Fossils, Humans, Male, Models, Biological, Tooth, Hominidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review