The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electroporation of Cell Membranes: A Review
Abstract
The study of the electroporation on biomembranes has become one of the most exciting topics in the biophysical and biotechnological areas. Researchers all over the world have been focused on four major areas: measurements of transmembrane potential (TMP); dynamics of electroporation such as time sequence, properties of electropores such as size, structure, and population; membrane permeabilization and breakdown theory; and the effects of secondary factors such as ions type and cell growth stage on electroporation. This article reviews some of the recent discoveries and theories on this subject. Studies on TMP and pore dynamics remain a difficult task. Since the area of electroporation on a biomembrane is small (less than 0.1% of total surface area) and the time sequence of electropores is in the submicrosecond range measuring devices with subtle detection and time resolution are required. While more and more studies have shown the formation sequence of electropore(s) at specific locations on various biomembranes, the pore(s) widening process and the subsequent membrane breakdown mechanisms remain controversial. The influence of electromechanical stress or transmembrane potential on membrane discharge and rupture seems to be a function of various factors such as membrane properties, external medium, and the protocols of electroporators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recovery of Biomolecules from Food Wastes—A Review
Baiano, A. (2014) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules190914821 · Cited by 504
An overview of the recent trends on the waste valorization techniques for food wastes
Nayak, A., & Bhushan, B. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.041 · Cited by 486
A Review of Basic to Clinical Studies of Irreversible Electroporation Therapy
Jiang, C., Davalos, R. V., & Bischof, J. C. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2014.2367543 · Cited by 332
Irreversible electroporation (NanoKnife) in cancer treatment
Jourabchi, N., Beroukhim, K., Tafti, B. A., Kee, S. T., & Lee, E. W. (2014) · Gastrointestinal Intervention · doi:10.1016/j.gii.2014.02.002 · Cited by 99
The use of electric fields in tissue engineering: A review
Markx, G. H. (2008) · Organogenesis · doi:10.4161/org.5799 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Ho, S. Y., & Mittal, G. S.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-362
- ISSN
- 0738-8551 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7801
- OpenAlex
- W2144887721
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electroporation of Cell Membranes: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/07388559609147426
- The paper
- Ho, S. Y., & Mittal, G. S. (1996). Electroporation of Cell Membranes: A Review. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388559609147426
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.