The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual Placement and Support in Sweden—A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently there is no evidence on the effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) in Sweden. AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of IPS on vocational outcomes among people with severe mental illness (SMI) in a Swedish context. A secondary aim was to evaluate a community integration effect. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with a parallel design was used. Mental health outpatients with SMI were randomized to IPS or traditional vocational rehabilitation (TVR) services. The allocation status was assessor-blinded. The primary outcome was competitive employment. All vocational outcomes were collected continuously, and socio-demographic and clinical variables at baseline, 6 and 18 months. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00960024. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty participants were randomized. Eighty seven per cent were assessed after 6 months, and 73% after 18 months. IPS was more effective than TVR in terms of gaining employment at 18-month follow-up (46% vs. 11%; difference 36%, 95% CI 18-54), along with the amount of working hours and weeks, longer job tenure periods and income. Cox regression analysis showed that IPS participants gained employment five times quicker than those in TVR. Ninety per cent of the IPS participants became involved in work, internships or education, i.e. activities integrated in mainstream community settings, while 24% in the TVR group achieved this. CONCLUSIONS: IPS is effective in a Swedish context in terms of gaining employment and becoming integrated within the local community. The welfare system presented obstacles for gaining competitive employment directly and it was indicated that internships delayed time to first competitive employment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These interventions included staff training about activity engagement, its importance for addressing mental illness and approaches to encourage engagement (49); Individual Placement and Support (IPS) (45, 48); cognitive remediation (50); Social Recovery Therapy (SRT) (based on cognitive behavioral strategies) (52–54); a befriending program (56); lifestyle modification (51) and occupational therapy”
From Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“POES has been used to measure activity engagement and community inclusion outcomes of IPS programs for people experiencing severe mental illness (45, 48), with significant improvements reported with more engagement in a range of activities and community contexts.”
From Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“An alternative approach to time use assessment, such as the POES (36), focuses on activities as defined by people with severe mental illness themselves and is more able to evaluate a range of health and well-being aspects of activity engagement that are sensitive to the influence of complex factors like capacities, experiences, and the course of recovery (36, 37, 48, 51).”
From Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“The demographic profile of this present study is similar to other IPS studies [63, 72–76] in that it does not represent the SMI population.”
From An enhanced individual placement and support (iPS) intervention based on the model of human occupation (MOHO); a prospective cohort study (2020) · cites this paper as [73]
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
Application and Results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (Mansa)
Priebe, S., Huxley, P., Knight, S., & Evans, S. (1999) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/002076409904500102 · Cited by 1,071
An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment.
Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Becker, D. R. (2008) · Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal · doi:10.2975/31.4.2008.280.290 · Cited by 696
Implementing Supported Employmentas an Evidence-Based Practice
Bond, G. R., Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E., Rapp, C. A., Meisler, N., Lehman, A. F., Bell, M. D., & Blyler, C. R. (2001) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.313 · Cited by 681
Burns, T., Catty, J., Becker, T., Drake, R. E., Fioritti, A., Knapp, M., Lauber, C., Rössler, W., Tomov, T., van Busschbach, J., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61516-5 · Cited by 613
Definition and prevalence of severe and persistent mental illness
Ruggeri, M., Leese, M., Thornicroft, G., Bisoffi, G., & Tansella, M. (2000) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.177.2.149 · Cited by 552
Helping people with severe mental illness to obtain work: systematic review
Crowther, R. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7280.204 · Cited by 538
Dunn, E. C., Wewiorski, N. J., & Rogers, E. S. (2008) · Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal · doi:10.2975/32.1.2008.59.62 · Cited by 412
Drake, R. E., McHugo, G. J., Bebout, R. R., Becker, D. R., Harris, M., Bond, G. R., & Quimby, E. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.7.627 · Cited by 381
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Jonasson I, 2004, Rehabilitation and alienation?
- National Board of Health and Welfare, 2005, Municipality achievements for people with psychiatric disabilities. Final report 2002-2004 (In Swedish)
- National Board of Health and Welfare, 2007, The support of the National Board of Health and Welfare to the development within mental health care services and municipality run services for people with psychiatric disabilities (In Swedish)
- Swedish Government Official Reports, 2006, The National Psychiatry Coordination. In the beginning was the organization. Rehabilitation into work for people with psychiatric disabilities, hinders or facilitators. Report 2006:1 (In Swedish)
- National Board of Health and Welfare, 2011, National guidelines for psychosocial interventions in schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like conditions 2011: support for governance and management (In Swedish)
- Becker D, 2008, Evidence-Based Supported Employment Fidelity Review Manual
- Kolakowska T, 1976, BPRS
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modini, M., Tan, L., Brinchmann, B., Wang, M.-J., Killackey, E., Glozier, N., Mykletun, A., & Harvey, S. B. (2016) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.115.165092 · Cited by 422
Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people
Nieuwenhuijsen, K., Faber, B., Verbeek, J. H. A. M., Neumeyer‐Gromen, A., Hees, H. L., Verhoeven, A. C., Feltz-Cornelis, C. M. V. D., & Bültmann, U. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006237.pub3 · Cited by 326
Frederick, D. E., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212208 · Cited by 219
Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people
Nieuwenhuijsen, K., Verbeek, J. H. A. M., Neumeyer‐Gromen, A., Verhoeven, A. C., Bültmann, U., & Faber, B. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006237.pub4 · Cited by 234
Suijkerbuijk, Y. B., Schaafsma, F. G., van Mechelen, J., Ojajärvi, A., Corbière, M., & Anema, J. R. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011867.pub2 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Bejerholm, U., Areberg, C., Hofgren, C., Sandlund, M., & Rinaldi, M.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Umeå University (SE)
- South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bejerholm, Ulrika
- Venue
- Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-66
- ISSN
- 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
- 0803-9488
- 1502-4725
- OpenAlex
- W1970238684
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 33.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Employment and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- Individual Placement and Support, severe mental illness, vocational rehabilitation, competitive employment, social reintegration, employment effects, internships, job tenure, income, Sweden
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Socioeconomic Factors, Sweden, Single-Blind Method, Employment, Supported, Young Adult, Community Integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
