Cited by 422Disability Education and EmploymentSchizophrenia research and treatmentEmployment and Welfare Studies

Supported employment for people with severe mental illness: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the international evidence

Open access
Modini, Matthew, Tan, Leona, Brinchmann, Beate, Wang, Min-Jung, Killackey, Eoin, Glozier, Nicholas, Mykletun, Arnstein, Harvey, Samuel B.·2016·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Individual placement and support (IPS) is a vocational rehabilitation programme that was developed in the USA to improve employment outcomes for people with severe mental illness. Its ability to be generalised to other countries and its effectiveness in varying economic conditions remains to be ascertained. Aims: To investigate whether IPS is effective across international settings and in different economic conditions. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing IPS with traditional vocational services was undertaken; 17 studies, as well as 2 follow-up studies, were included. Meta-regressions were carried out to examine whether IPS effectiveness varied according to geographic location, unemployment rates or gross domestic product (GDP) growth. Results: The overall pooled risk ratio for competitive employment using IPS compared with traditional vocational rehabilitation was 2.40 (95% CI 1.99–2.90). Meta-regressions indicated that neither geographic area nor unemployment rates affected the overall effectiveness of IPS. Even when a country's GDP growth was less than 2% IPS was significantly more effective than traditional vocational training, and its benefits remained evident over 2 years. Conclusions: Individual placement and support is an effective intervention across a variety of settings and economic conditions and is more than twice as likely to lead to competitive employment when compared with traditional vocational rehabilitation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.165092

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 1 Lehman AF. Vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1995; 21: 645-56.
  2. Bond GR, Becker DR, Drake RE, Vogler KM. A fidelity scale for the individual placement and support model of supported employment. Rehab Couns Bull 1997; 40: 265-84.
  3. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR. An illustrated guide to the methods of metaanalysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2001; 7: 135-48.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Modini, M., Tan, L., Brinchmann, B., Wang, M.-J., Killackey, E., Glozier, N., Mykletun, A., & Harvey, S. B.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Harvey, Samuel B.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-07
Volume
209
Issue
1
Pages
14-22
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2338814622
Cited by
422
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 6
FWCI
12.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSW Ministry of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
Individual Placement and Support, supported employment, severe mental illness, vocational rehabilitation, competitive employment, economic conditions, unemployment rate, gross domestic product
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Employment, Supported, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review