Cited by 36Attachment and Relationship DynamicsRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsOrgan and Tissue Transplantation Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attachment style predict compliance, quality of life and renal function in adult patients after kidney transplant: preliminary results

Open access

Abstract

AIM: Aim of this study was to evaluate the association between attachment style, compliance, quality of life and renal function in adult patients after kidney transplantation. METHODS: A total of 43 adult patients who received a kidney transplant more than 3 months before were enrolled and were asked to complete two Self-Report questionnaires: Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ-40) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Also compliance was measured using appropriate questions. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis showed associations between the confidence in relationships (ASQ-40) and compliance [beta = -0.37; B = -0.02; t(41) = -2.51; p = 0.02]; aspects of anxious attachment style (ASQ-40) and creatinine levels [beta = 0.3; B = 0.13; t(41) = 2.03; p = 0.04]; aspects of avoidant attachment style (ASQ-40) and compliance [beta = -0.37; B = -3.15; t(41) = -2.35; p = 0.02]. Patients who exhibited avoidant attachment had a significantly better perception of their own general health than patients with anxious [F(2,37) = 6.8; p < 0.05] or secure attachment; however, they had a worse perception regarding role limitations due to emotional problems, compared to patients with anxious attachment [F(2,37) = 6.4; p < 0.05]. DISCUSSION: The results of this study suggest that the evaluation of the attachment style in adult kidney transplant patients can contribute to plan a goal-directed psychological support program for these patients, in order to increase their compliance. The association between aspects of anxious attachment style and creatinine level needs more investigations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0886022x.2015.1010989

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Younger age, depression and anxiety, using avoidance as an adaptation strategy, and inability to communicate emotions and emotional dysregulation are factors predisposing to poor medication adherence in transplant patients.

    “Younger age, depression and anxiety, using avoidance as an adaptation strategy, and the inability to communicate emotions and emotional dysregulation represent some of the factors predisposing to poor medication adherence in transplant patients [3,11,12].”

    From Effectiveness of Expressive Writing in Kidney Transplanted Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) associates avoidant and anxious attachment with worse compliance in adult kidney transplant recipients. It does not establish avoidance as an adaptation strategy, or identify younger age, depression, anxiety symptoms, inability to communicate emotions, or emotional dysregulation as causes of poor medication adherence. Its age finding concerns physical activity, pain, and vitality, and the study's cross-sectional design does not establish predisposition. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Calia, R., Lai, C., Aceto, P., Luciani, M., Camardese, G., Lai, S., Amato, G., Pietroni, V., Salerno, M. P., Pedroso, J. A., Romagnoli, J., & Citterio, F.
Affiliations
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Department of Surgery, Transplantation Service, Catholic University of Sacred Heart
Corresponding author
Aceto, Paola
Venue
Renal Failure
Published
2015-02-17
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
678-680
ISSN
  • 0886-022X (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-6049
OpenAlex
W2076791392
Cited by
36
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Renal Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
Keywords
attachment styles, kidney transplantation, medication adherence, quality of life, renal function, creatinine levels, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, secure attachment, psychological support, post-transplant patients
MeSH terms
Assessment of Medication Adherence, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Kidney Function Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Quality of Life, Kidney Transplantation, Drug Monitoring, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review