Cited by 106Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Biology and FertilityDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Reflections on inositol(s) for PCOS therapy: steps toward success

Nestler, John E., Unfer, Vittorio·2015·Gynecological Endocrinology

Abstract

In polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) pathogenesis, both the insulin resistance and the related compensatory hyperinsulinemia are involved. Despite their similarities, Myo-inositol (MI) and d-chiro-inositol (DCI) play different roles in PCOS etiology and therapy. Indeed, in tissue such as the liver both molecules are involved in the insulin signaling, i.e. MI promotes glucose uptake and DCI glycogen synthesis. In reproductive tissue such as the ovary, MI regulates glucose uptake and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) signaling, whereas DCI is devoted to the insulin-mediated androgen production. The new hypothesis on "DCI paradox" in the ovary has provided the key for a better understanding. Unlike other tissues, ovary is not insulin resistant, indeed because the epimerase enzyme, which converts MI to DCI, is insulin dependent, the "DCI paradox" hypothesis suggests that in the ovary of PCOS women, an increased epimerase activity leads to a DCI overproduction and MI depletion. This imbalance could be the cause of the poor oocyte quality and the impairment in the FSH signaling. Owing to this situation, the focal point is the administration of both MI and DCI in a proper ratio for treating PCOS. This topic, with several other "hot" issues, was the driving thread in the discussion between the two scientists.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09513590.2015.1054802

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nestler, J. E., & Unfer, V.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Nestler, John E.
Venue
Gynecological Endocrinology
Published
2015-07-03
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
501-505
ISSN
  • 0951-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0766
OpenAlex
W2201373703
Cited by
106
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gynecological Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, myo-inositol, D-chiro-inositol, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, insulin signaling, epimerase, androgen production, oocyte quality, insulin-sensitizing therapy
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Inositol, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review