Cited by 136Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

No hope without compassion: the importance of compassion in recovery-focused mental health services

Spandler, Helen, Stickley, Theo·2011·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whilst current policy is replete with recovery language and references to the need for services to create a sense of hope and optimism, there is less understanding about how such hope may be engendered within services. We propose that an understanding of compassion is necessary to appreciate what actually stimulates hope-inspiring practices. AIMS: An examination of the continuing relevance of compassion to mental health care and an exploration of its place within modern mental health policy and practice. METHODS: A review of the compassion deficit in mental health care and a critical examination of whether the direction of current mental health policy in the UK is likely to facilitate compassionate care. RESULTS: Compassion needs to be viewed not merely as an individual expression or property but something which must be nurtured in context, through relationships, cultures and healing environments. However, current mental health policy and practice does not appear to prioritise the development of such contexts. CONCLUSION: Attention to fostering compassion would help to shift the language of "recovery" (or "well-being") beyond the twin dangers of rhetoric and/or imposing preconceived definitions, models or expectations of what recovery "should" be. Therefore, the development of compassionate contexts should have a stronger place in modern mental health practice and policy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638237.2011.583949

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spandler, H., & Stickley, T.
Affiliations
University of Lancashire (GB)
Corresponding author
Spandler, Helen
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2011-11-29
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
555-566
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W2082732280
Cited by
136
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
compassion, hope, mental health policy, compassionate care, healing environment, therapeutic relationship
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Empathy, United Kingdom, Health Policy, Humans, Mental Health Services, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review