CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 214Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationWorkplace Health and Well-beingMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions

Carroll, Christopher, Rick, Jo, Pilgrim, Hazel, Cameron, Jackie, Hillage, Jim·2010·Disability and Rehabilitation
DOI 10.3109/09638280903186301
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: Long-term sickness absence among workers is a major problem in industrialised countries. The aim of the review is to determine whether interventions involving the workplace are more effective and cost-effective at helping employees on sick leave return to work than those that do not involve the workplace at all. METHODS: A systematic review of controlled intervention studies and economic evaluations. Sixteen electronic databases and grey literature sources were searched, and reference and citation tracking was performed on included publications. A narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Ten articles were found reporting nine trials from Europe and Canada, and four articles were found evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions. The population in eight trials suffered from back pain and related musculoskeletal conditions. Interventions involving employees, health practitioners and employers working together, to implement work modifications for the absentee, were more consistently effective than other interventions. Early intervention was also found to be effective. The majority of trials were of good or moderate quality. Economic evaluations indicated that interventions with a workplace component are likely to be more cost effective than those without. CONCLUSION: Stakeholder participation and work modification are more effective and cost effective at returning to work adults with musculoskeletal conditions than other workplace-linked interventions, including exercise.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638280903186301

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Confederation of British Industry (CBI), 2006, Absence minded: absence and labour turnover 2006
  2. Barham C, 2005, Labour market trends
  3. Barham C, 2002, Labour market trends
  4. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2001, Report 4: Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness; CRD's guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews
  5. Eddy SA, 1985, The role of mathematical modelling. Assessing medical technology
  6. Popay J, 2006, Lancaster
  7. Durand M, 2000, Work, 17, 57
  8. 10.1136/oem.2002.006460 · DOI
  9. Skouen J, 2006, Norsk Epidemiologi, 16, 127

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–214 of 214

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Carroll, C., Rick, J., Pilgrim, H., Cameron, J., & Hillage, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Carroll, Christopher
ORCID
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-10-06
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
607-621
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
DOI
10.3109/09638280903186301
OpenAlex
W2002447441
Semantic Scholar
2d074862a8dd9b30f7a2c421958a5b7c0e23e201
Cited by
214
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
return to work, long-term sick leave, back pain, musculoskeletal disorders, workplace interventions, work modification, cost-effectiveness, stakeholder engagement, early intervention, exercise intervention, sick leave
MeSH terms
Adult, Back Pain, Canada, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Europe, Humans, Ergonomics, Occupational Diseases, Workplace, Sick Leave

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review