Cited by 47Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Concomitant injuries and its influence on functional outcome after traumatic brain injury

Leong, Be Kim, Mazlan, Mazlina, Rahim, Rameezan Begam Abd, Ganesan, Dharmendra·2013·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to describe the presence and severity of extracranial concomitant injuries in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and to ascertain their effect on long-term functional outcome. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a single-center recruiting patients with first episode of TBI. The types and severity of extracranial concomitant injuries were documented for patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Injuries with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) grade 3-6 were considered to be high grade. A cross-sectional functional assessment was conducted at 18 months post-injury using Glasgow Outcome Scale. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis. Extracranial concomitant injuries were seen in 78% of the patients. Three commonest injuries were facial (44%), lower extremity (20%) and upper extremity (12%) injuries. Among the AIS grade ≥ 3, injury involving the chest was most common (41%). Presence of extracranial concomitant injuries AIS grade ≥ 3 was significantly associated with disability in TBI patients at 18 months (OR 12.74, 95% CI 2.39-67.95, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Presence of extracranial concomitant injuries was high. In TBI survivors, extracranial concomitant injuries AIS grade ≥ 3 influenced the long-term functional outcome at 18 months, causing moderate and severe disabilities. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Concomitant injuries should be suspected in patients with traumatic brain injury, especially in a high-speed trauma mechanisms as the incidence can be as high as 78% as in this study and may interfere with the long term rehabilitation and outcome. This study shows that severe extra cranial concomitant injuries are associated with a poor long term functional outcome even in the mild traumatic brain injury patients and therefore need to be addressed early in the rehabilitation of this group of patients. Early diagnosis and management of severe concomitant injuries is warranted and may improve the functional gains in the long term after traumatic brain injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638288.2012.748832

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leong, B. K., Mazlan, M., Rahim, R. B. A., & Ganesan, D.
Affiliations
  • Sultan Ismail Specialist Hospital (MY)
  • University of Malaya (MY)
Corresponding author
Mazlan, Mazlina
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2013-01-07
Volume
35
Issue
18
Pages
1546-1551
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2085092685
Cited by
47
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, polytrauma, functional outcome, disability, Abbreviated Injury Scale, facial trauma, thoracic trauma, mild traumatic brain injury, rehabilitation, Glasgow Outcome Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Arm Injuries, Brain Injuries, Cross-Sectional Studies, Facial Injuries, Female, Humans, Leg Injuries, Malaysia, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Trauma, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Prevalence, Abbreviated Injury Scale, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function, Glasgow Outcome Scale, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review