The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review: Do engineered nanoparticles pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment?
Abstract
Nanotechnology is a rapidly growing industry of global economic importance, exploiting the novel characteristics of materials manufactured at the nanoscale. The properties of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) that make them useful in a wide range of industrial applications, however, have led to concerns regarding their potential impact on human and environmental health. The aquatic environment is particularly at risk of exposure to ENPs, as it acts as a sink for most environmental contaminants. This paper critically evaluates what is currently known about sources and discharge of ENPs to the aquatic environment and how the physicochemical characteristics of ENPs affect their fate and behaviour and thus availability for uptake into aquatic organisms, and assesses reported toxicological effects. Having reviewed the ecotoxicological information, the conclusion is that whilst there are data indicating some nanoparticles have the potential to induce harm in exposed aquatic organisms, there is insufficient evidence for harm, for known/modelled environmental concentrations for almost all ENPs considered. This conclusion, however, must be balanced by the fact that there are significant gaps in our understanding on the fate and behaviour of ENPs in the aquatic environment. Greater confidence in the assessments on ENP impacts in aquatic systems to enable effective comparisons across studies urgently requires more standardised approaches for ENP hazard identification, and critically, more thorough characterisations on the exposed particles. There is also an urgent need for the advancement of tools and techniques that can accurately quantify and visualise uptake of nanoparticles into biological tissues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: An overview
Zhang, W.-X. (2003) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025520116015 · Cited by 2,003
Brunner, T. J., Wick, P., Manser, P., Spohn, P., Grass, R. N., Limbach, L. K., Bruinink, A., & Stark, W. J. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es052069i · Cited by 1,385
Size-dependent toxicity of metal oxide particles—A comparison between nano- and micrometer size
Karlsson, H. L., Gustafsson, J., Cronholm, P., & Möller, L. (2009) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.03.014 · Cited by 949
Limbach, L. K., Li, Y., Grass, R. N., Brunner, T. J., Hintermann, M. A., Muller, M., Gunther, D., & Stark, W. J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051043o · Cited by 779 · cited 1×
“…particles were found to agglomerate more slowly than smaller particles, enabling them to penetrate cells more efficiently before sedimentation occurred (Limbach et al�, 2005)� Charge in itself has been implicated as a factor influencing ENP transport and toxicity� Wax nanoparticles with neutral…”
BackgroundManufactured nanoparticles: their uptake and effects on fish—a mechanistic analysis
Handy, R. D., Henry, T. B., Scown, T. M., Johnston, B. D., & Tyler, C. R. (2008) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0205-1 · Cited by 447
Self-citationSchaller, M. F., & Fan, Y. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2008jd010636 · Cited by 222
Stiffness Alterations of Single Cells Induced by UV in the Presence of NanoTiO2
Vileno, B., Lekka, M., Sienkiewicz, A., Jeney, S., Stoessel, G., Lekki, J., Forró, L., & Stachura, Z. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0629561 · Cited by 60
Cited by
Are Carbon Nanotube Effects on Green Algae Caused by Shading and Agglomeration?
Schwab, F., Bucheli, T. D., Lukhele, L. P., Magrez, A., Nowack, B., Sigg, L., & Knauer, K. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es200506b · Cited by 334
Dabrunz, A., Duester, L., Prasse, C., Seitz, F., Rosenfeldt, R., Schilde, C., Schaumann, G. E., & Schulz, R. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020112 · Cited by 208
“paint, is likely to result in an unintentional release of NP into the environment, causing unknown risks to human and wildlife health [2,3].”
BackgroundWaalewijn-Kool, P. L., Rupp, S., Lofts, S., Svendsen, C., & van Gestel, C. A. M. (2014) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.06.031 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Scown, T. M., van Aerle, R., & Tyler, C. R.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Toxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-07-21
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 653-670
- ISSN
- 0045-6446 (ISSN-L)
- 1040-8444
- 1547-6898
- OpenAlex
- W2074013606
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review: Do engineered nanoparticles pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10408444.2010.494174
- The paper
- Scown, T. M., van Aerle, R., & Tyler, C. R. (2010). Review: Do engineered nanoparticles pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment? Critical Reviews in Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2010.494174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.