The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glycosylation: Heterogeneity and the 3D Structure of Proteins
Abstract
Glycoproteins generally exist as populations of glycosylated variants (glycoforms) of a single polypeptide. Although the same glycosylation machinery is available to all proteins that enter the secretory pathway in a given cell, most glycoproteins emerge with characteristic glycosylation patterns and heterogeneous populations of glycans at each glycosylation site. The factors that control the composition of the glycoform populations and the role that heterogeneity plays in the function of glycoproteins are important questions for glycobiology. A full understanding of the implications of glycosylation for the structure and function of a protein can only be reached when a glycoprotein is viewed as a single entity. Individual glycoproteins, by virtue of their unique structures, can selectively control their own glycosylation by modulating interactions with the glycosylating enzymes in the cell. Examples include protein-specific glycosylation within the immunoglobulins and immunoglobulin superfamily and site-specific processing in ribonuclease, Thy-1, IgG, tissue plasminogen activator, and influenza A hemagglutinin. General roles for the range of sugars on glycoproteins such as the leukocyte antigens include orientating the molecules on the cell surface. A major role for specific sugars is in recognition by lectins, including chaperones involved in protein folding. In addition, the recognition of identical motifs in different glycans allows a heterogeneous population of glycoforms to participate in specific biological interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schachter, H. (1986) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/o86-026 · Cited by 526
Lee, Y. C., Townsend, R. R., Hardy, M. R., Lönngren, J., Arnarp, J., Haraldsson, M., & Lönn, H. (1983) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)33240-x · Cited by 503
Cited by
The Impact of Glycosylation on the Biological Function and Structure of Human Immunoglobulins
Arnold, J. N., Wormald, M. R., Sim, R. B., Rudd, P. M., & Dwek, R. A. (2007) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141702 · Cited by 1,307
Self-citationConcepts and Principles of O-Linked Glycosylation
Steen, P. V. D., Rudd, P. M., Dwek, R. A., & Opdenakker, G. (1998) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409239891204198 · Cited by 760
Self-citationRole of Glycosylation in Development
Haltiwanger, R. S., & Lowe, J. B. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074043 · Cited by 757
Scanlan, C. N., Pantophlet, R., Wormald, M. R., Saphire, E. O., Stanfield, R., Wilson, I. A., Katinger, H., Dwek, R. A., Rudd, P. M., & Burton, D. R. (2002) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.76.14.7306-7321.2002 · Cited by 665
Self-citationHart, G. W., & Copeland, R. J. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.008 · Cited by 643
Metadata
- Authors
- Rudd, P. M., & Dwek, R. A.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-100
- ISSN
- 0045-6411 (ISSN-L)
- 1040-9238
- 1549-7798
- OpenAlex
- W2105379208
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glycosylation: Heterogeneity and the 3D Structure of Proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10409239709085144
- The paper
- Rudd, P. M., & Dwek, R. A. (1997). Glycosylation: Heterogeneity and the 3D Structure of Proteins. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.3109/10409239709085144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.