The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in patients with dipper versus non-dipper hypertension
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are associated with worse outcome in various diseases. Non-dipping blood pressure pattern is associated with higher cardiovascular mortality. The aim of this study was to explore the association between NLR and PLR in patients with dipper versus non-dipper hypertension. METHODS: The study included 166 patients with hypertension. Eighty-three patients (40 male, mean age: 49.1 ± 10.5 years) had dipper hypertension, while 83 patients (41 male, mean age: 52.3 ± 12.7 years) had non-dipper hypertension. RESULTS: Baseline demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Patients with non-dipper hypertension had significantly higher NLR compared to dipper hypertension (2.3 ± 0.9 versus 1.8 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). Patients with non-dipper hypertension had significantly higher PLR compared to dipper hypertension (117.7 ± 35.2 versus 100.9 ± 30.5, p = 0.001). In univariate analysis, hyperlipidemia, smoking, presence of diabetes, PLR more than 107 and NLR more than 1.89 were among predictors of dipper and non-dipper status. In logistic regression analyses, only hyperlipidemia (odds ratio: 2.96, CI: 1.22-7.13) and PLR more than 107 (odds ratio: 2.62, CI: 1.13-6.06) were independent predictors of dipper and non-dipper status. A PLR of 107 or higher predicted non-dipper status with a sensitivity of 66.3% and specificity of 68.7%. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that patients with non-dipper hypertension had significantly higher NLR and PLR compared to dipper hypertension, which has not been reported previously. Moreover PLR more than 107 but not NLR was independent predictor of non-dipper status.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sasaki, N., Ozono, R., Yamauchi, R., Teramen, K., Munemori, M., Hamada, H., Edahiro, Y., Ishii, K., Seto, A., & Kihara, Y. (2012) · Clinical and Experimental Hypertension · doi:10.3109/10641963.2012.681083 · Cited by 19
Cited by
Balta, S., & Ozturk, C. (2015) · Platelets · doi:10.3109/09537104.2014.979340 · Cited by 358
Aydin Sunbul, E., Sunbul, M., Yanartas, O., Cengiz, F., Bozbay, M., Sari, I., & Gulec, H. (2016) · Psychiatry Investigation · doi:10.4306/pi.2016.13.1.121 · Cited by 145
Koseoglu, H. I., Altunkas, F., Kanbay, A., Doruk, S., Etikan, I., & Demir, O. (2015) · Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis · doi:10.1007/s11239-014-1103-4 · Cited by 74
Zhou, D., Wang, G., Fan, Y., Wan, Z., & Liu, X. (2017) · Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine · doi:10.3892/etm.2016.3993 · Cited by 40
Effects of psychotropics on neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in psychiatric patients
VENKATARAMAN, R., RASHID, M., G, A., DANIEL, S., & AMALATHOMAS (2019) · Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research · doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2019.v12i6.33251 · Cited by 3
“The neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inexpensive, reproducible test which can be obtained from the white blood cell count and has been considered as a new biomarker for systemic inflammatory response [1,2].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Sunbul, M., Gerin, F., Durmus, E., Kivrak, T., Sari, I., Tigen, K., & Cincin, A.
- Venue
- Clinical and Experimental Hypertension
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-06-20
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 217-221
- ISSN
- 0148-3927 (ISSN-L)
- 1064-1963
- 1525-6006
- OpenAlex
- W1986738069
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in patients with dipper versus non-dipper hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10641963.2013.804547
- The paper
- Sunbul, M., Gerin, F., Durmus, E., Kivrak, T., Sari, I., Tigen, K., & Cincin, A. (2014). Neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in patients with dipper versus non-dipper hypertension. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.3109/10641963.2013.804547
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.