Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in patients with dipper versus non-dipper hypertension

Open access
Sunbul, Murat, Gerin, Fethullah, Durmus, Erdal, Kivrak, Tarik, Sari, Ibrahim, Tigen, Kursat, Cincin, Altug·2014·Clinical and Experimental Hypertension

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are associated with worse outcome in various diseases. Non-dipping blood pressure pattern is associated with higher cardiovascular mortality. The aim of this study was to explore the association between NLR and PLR in patients with dipper versus non-dipper hypertension. METHODS: The study included 166 patients with hypertension. Eighty-three patients (40 male, mean age: 49.1 ± 10.5 years) had dipper hypertension, while 83 patients (41 male, mean age: 52.3 ± 12.7 years) had non-dipper hypertension. RESULTS: Baseline demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Patients with non-dipper hypertension had significantly higher NLR compared to dipper hypertension (2.3 ± 0.9 versus 1.8 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). Patients with non-dipper hypertension had significantly higher PLR compared to dipper hypertension (117.7 ± 35.2 versus 100.9 ± 30.5, p = 0.001). In univariate analysis, hyperlipidemia, smoking, presence of diabetes, PLR more than 107 and NLR more than 1.89 were among predictors of dipper and non-dipper status. In logistic regression analyses, only hyperlipidemia (odds ratio: 2.96, CI: 1.22-7.13) and PLR more than 107 (odds ratio: 2.62, CI: 1.13-6.06) were independent predictors of dipper and non-dipper status. A PLR of 107 or higher predicted non-dipper status with a sensitivity of 66.3% and specificity of 68.7%. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that patients with non-dipper hypertension had significantly higher NLR and PLR compared to dipper hypertension, which has not been reported previously. Moreover PLR more than 107 but not NLR was independent predictor of non-dipper status.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10641963.2013.804547

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Sunbul, M., Gerin, F., Durmus, E., Kivrak, T., Sari, I., Tigen, K., & Cincin, A.
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Hypertension
Published
2013-06-20
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
217-221
ISSN
  • 0148-3927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1064-1963
  • 1525-6006
OpenAlex
W1986738069
Cited by
210
References
1
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in patients with dipper versus non-dipper hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10641963.2013.804547
The paper
Sunbul, M., Gerin, F., Durmus, E., Kivrak, T., Sari, I., Tigen, K., & Cincin, A. (2014). Neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in patients with dipper versus non-dipper hypertension. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.3109/10641963.2013.804547

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.