Cited by 40Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Platelet to lymphocyte ratio is associated with the severity of coronary artery disease and clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in the Chinese Han population

Open access
Zhou, Dong, Wang, Guangyao, Fan, Yan, Wan, Zhaofei, Liu, Xiaojun·2017·Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the ratio of the absolute number of platelets to the number of lymphocytes (PLR) correlates with the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and major adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in Chinese patients with CAD. PLR was calculated as follows: PLR=platelet count/lymphocyte count, using the complete blood counts of 854 Chinese Han subjects. CAD severity was determined using angiographic evidence by cardiologists unaware of the study aims. The association between PLR and CAD severity was analyzed by logistic regression. Clinical endpoints were evaluated during a median follow-up period of 42 months. The association between PLR and CVD events was assessed using Cox regression models. Patients with PLR>171 exhibited more severe coronary artery stenosis [odds ratio, 2.393; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.394-4.108; P=0.002] and worse prognoses, with a higher rate of major adverse CVD events during five years of follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.982; 95% CI, 1.329-2.957; P=0.001). A Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrated that the CVD event rate of 34.27% in patients with PLR>171 was significantly higher than that in patients with PLR<100 (P<0.001). These findings suggest that PLR is independently associated with CAD severity and long-term major adverse CVD events; therefore, high PLR may predict poor prognosis of CAD in the Chinese Han population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3892/etm.2016.3993

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, D., Wang, G., Fan, Y., Wan, Z., & Liu, X.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Brain Hospital (CN)
Venue
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
Published
2016-12-22
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
731-738
ISSN
  • 1792-0981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1792-1015
OpenAlex
W2564729975
Cited by
40
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2012CB517804, 81025002)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, coronary artery disease, disease severity, major adverse cardiovascular events, prognostic factors, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery stenosis, Han Chinese

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review