Cited by 116Teleoperation and Haptic SystemsSurgical Simulation and TrainingMotor Control and Adaptation

Evaluation of a Telerobotic System to Assist Surgeons in Microsurgery

Open access
Das, Hari, Zak, Haya, Johnson, Jason, Crouch, John, Frambach, Don·1999·Computer Aided Surgery

Abstract

A tool was developed that assists surgeons in manipulating surgical instruments more precisely than is possible manually. The tool is a telemanipulator that scales down the surgeon's hand motion and filters tremor in the motion. The signals measured from the surgeon's hand are transformed and used to drive a six-degrees-of-freedom robot to position the surgical instrument mounted on its tip. A pilot study comparing the performance of the telemanipulator system against manual instrument positioning was conducted at the University of Southern California School of Medicine. The results show that a telerobotic tool can improve the performance of a microsurgeon by increasing the precision with which he can position surgical instruments, but this is achieved at the cost of increased time in performing the task. We believe that this technology will extend the capabilities of microsurgeons and allow more surgeons to perform highly skilled procedures currently performed only by the best surgeons. It will also enable performance of new surgical procedures that are beyond the capabilities of even the most skilled surgeons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10929089909148155

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Das, H., Zak, H., Johnson, J., Crouch, J., & Frambach, D.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Das, Hari
Venue
Computer Aided Surgery
Published
1999-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
15-25
ISSN
  • 1092-9088 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0150
OpenAlex
W4231034584
Cited by
116
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computer Aided Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • University of Southern California
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
telesurgery, telemanipulators, microsurgery, surgical instrument positioning, six-degree-of-freedom robot, surgical precision, task completion time
MeSH terms
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Microsurgery, Pilot Projects, Robotics, Surgical Instruments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review