Cited by 46Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsMotor Control and Adaptation

Visuo-tactile integration and body ownership during self-generated action

Open access
Rognini, G., Sengül, A., Aspell, J. E., Salomon, R., Bleuler, H., Blanke, O.·2013·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Although there is increasing knowledge about how visual and tactile cues from the hands are integrated, little is known about how self-generated hand movements affect such multisensory integration. Visuo-tactile integration often occurs under highly dynamic conditions requiring sensorimotor updating. Here, we quantified visuo-tactile integration by measuring cross-modal congruency effects (CCEs) in different bimanual hand movement conditions with the use of a robotic platform. We found that classical CCEs also occurred during bimanual self-generated hand movements, and that such movements lowered the magnitude of visuo-tactile CCEs as compared to static conditions. Visuo-tactile integration, body ownership and the sense of agency were decreased by adding a temporal visuo-motor delay between hand movements and visual feedback. These data show that visual stimuli interfere less with the perception of tactile stimuli during movement than during static conditions, especially when decoupled from predictive motor information. The results suggest that current models of visuo-tactile integration need to be extended to account for multisensory integration in dynamic conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ejn.12128

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PPS shapes not only during physical body-objects interactions, such as those mediated by tool-use, but also during virtual interactions with far objects, mediated by a computer mouse or surgical robots, and even after social interactions with other persons, depending on the positive or negative value of those interactions.

    “Our data also corroborate recent reports showing that PPS shapes not only during physical body-objects interactions, such as those mediated by tool-use, but also during virtual interactions with far objects, mediated by a computer mouse (Bassolino et al., 2010) or surgical robots (Rognini et al., 2013; Sengül et al., 2012), and even after social interactions with other persons, depending on the”

    From Peripersonal space as the space of the bodily self (2015) · cites this paper as Rognini et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Calvert, G.A., Spence, C. & Stein, B.E., (Eds), Handbook of Multisensory Processes. MIT press, USA, pp. 85-105.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rognini, G., Sengül, A., Aspell, J. E., Salomon, R., Bleuler, H., & Blanke, O.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Blanke, O.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-25
Volume
37
Issue
7
Pages
1120-1129
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2144078592
Cited by
46
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
visual-tactile integration, multisensory integration, body ownership, sense of agency, bimanual movement, robotic platform
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Image, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Skills, Reaction Time, Robotics, Visual Perception, Touch Perception, Feedback, Sensory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review