The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interprofessional teamwork and team interventions in chronic care: A systematic review
Abstract
To identify key features of teamwork and interventions for enhancing interprofessional teamwork (IPT) in chronic care and to develop a framework for further research, we conducted a systematic literature review of IPT in chronic care for the years 2002-2014. Database searches yielded 3217 abstracts, 21 of which fulfilled inclusion criteria. We identified two more studies on the topic by scanning the reference lists of included articles, which resulted in a final total of 23 included studies. The key features identified in the articles (e.g., team member characteristics, common task, communication, cooperation, coordination, responsibility, participation, staff satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and efficiency) were structured in line with the input-process-output model, and evaluated interventions, such as tools, workshops, and changes in team structure, were added to the model. The most frequently evaluated team interventions were complex intervention programs. All but one of the 14 evaluation studies resulted in enhancement of teamwork and/or staff-related, patient-related, and organization-related outcome criteria. To date, there is no consensus about the main features of IPT and the most effective team interventions in chronic care. However, the findings may be used to standardize the implementation and evaluation of IPT and team interventions in practice and for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Reeves, S., Perrier, L., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002213.pub3 · Cited by 1,946
Xyrichis, A., & Lowton, K. (2008) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.015 · Cited by 556
Cited by
Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000072.pub3 · Cited by 1,156
Wei, H., Horns, P., Sears, S. F., Huang, K., Smith, C. M., & Wei, T. L. (2022) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975 · Cited by 310
Sangaleti, C., Schveitzer, M. C., Peduzzi, M., Zoboli, E. L. C. P., & Soares, C. B. (2017) · JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003016 · Cited by 253
Implementation of interprofessional team-based care: A cross-case analysis
Sibbald, S. L., Ziegler, B. R., Maskell, R., & Schouten, K. (2021) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2020.1803228 · Cited by 17
Interprofessional collaboration in palliative dementia care through the eyes of informal caregivers
Khemai, C., Meijers, J. M., Mujezinovic, I., Bolt, S. R., Pieters, S., Moser, A., Schols, J. M. G. A., & Janssen, D. J. A. (2022) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/14713012221098259 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Körner, M., Bütof, S., Müller, C., Zimmermann, L., Becker, S., & Bengel, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Interprofessional Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-12-28
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-28
- ISSN
- 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9567
- OpenAlex
- W2208904281
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interprofessional teamwork and team interventions in chronic care: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/13561820.2015.1051616
- The paper
- Körner, M., Bütof, S., Müller, C., Zimmermann, L., Becker, S., & Bengel, J. (2016). Interprofessional teamwork and team interventions in chronic care: A systematic review. Journal of Interprofessional Care. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1051616
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.