Cited by 120Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Patient-centred home-based management of heart failure: Findings from a randomised clinical trial evaluating a tablet computer for self-care, quality of life and effects on knowledge

Open access
Hägglund, Ewa, Lyngå, Patrik, Frie, Filippa, Ullman, Bengt, Persson, Hans, Melin, Michael, Hagerman, Inger·2015·Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a new home intervention system (HIS, OPTILOGG(®)) consisting of a specialised software, a tablet computer (tablet) wirelessly connected to a weight scale may improve self-care behaviour, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), knowledge about heart failure (HF) and reduce hospital days due to HF. DESIGN: 82 patients (32% females) with mean age: 75 ± 8 years hospitalised with HF were randomised at discharge to an intervention group (IG) equipped with the HIS or to a control group (CG) receiving standard HF information only. The tablet contained information about HF and lifestyle advice according to current guidelines. It also showed present dose of diuretic, changes in patient-measured weight and HRQoL over time. RESULTS: After 3 months the IG displayed a dramatic improvement in self-care with p < 0.05 (median IG: 17 [IQR: 13, 22] and CG: 21 [IQR: 17, 25]). The disease-specific HRQoL was measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. The IG had significantly higher score (median IG: 65.1 [IQR: 38.5, 83.3] vs. CG: 52.1 [IQR: 41.1, 64.1] p < 0.05) and an improved physical limitation (median IG: 54.2 [IQR: 37.7, 83.3] vs. CG: 45.8 [IQR: 25.0, 54.2] p < 0.05) There was no difference in knowledge. IG showed fewer HF-related days in the hospital, with 1.3 HF-related hospital days/patient versus 3.5 in CG (risk ratio: 0.38; 95% confidence interval: 0.31-0.46; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: HF patients with a HIS tablet computer and scale improved in self-care and HRQoL. Days in hospital due to HF were reduced. A medical device that is easy to use can be a valuable tool for improving self-care and outcome in patients with HF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/14017431.2015.1035319

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hägglund, E., Lyngå, P., Frie, F., Ullman, B., Persson, H., Melin, M., & Hagerman, I.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Danderyds sjukhus (SE)
Corresponding author
Hägglund, Ewa
Venue
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Published
2015-06-04
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
193-199
ISSN
  • 1401-7431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2006
OpenAlex
W1634741264
Cited by
120
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
heart failure, home care, patient-centered care, tablet computers, self-care behavior, health-related quality of life, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, hospital readmission, patient knowledge, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Weight, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Readmission, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Self Care, Sweden, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Home Care Services, Hospital-Based, Patient-Centered Care, Computers, Handheld

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review