Cited by 8Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methylphenidate substitution for methamphetamine addiction and implications for future randomized clinical trials: a unique case series

Abstract

Background: Methamphetamine Use Disorders (MUD) pharmacotherapy research yields contradictory results.Objective: Our objective was to identify treatment outcome features of intravenous users of methamphetamine (IUM) treated by one healthcare provider using stable methylphenidate (MPH) substitution protocols over an extended interval.Method: We retrospectively examined a database of all intravenous MUD cases (24 patients) treated with short acting MPH and psychotherapy between 2007 and 2013 in a single outpatient addiction treatment facility.Results: Mean duration of treatment was 8 months (<1–31 months). Treatment resulted in full abstinence in 10 cases – maintained until the end of the observation period. Patients who stayed in treatment for more than a month and remained abstinent were more likely to be regular pattern users of methamphetamine (MA), female and characterized as having co-occurring psychiatric disorders that responded to treatment. These patients discontinued intravenous MA use and demonstrated stabilization of their health conditions. One adverse effect was reported by one patient who required emergency department treatment for accidental alcohol poisoning.Conclusion: Our clinical series indicated favorable outcomes and low dropout rates in patients with MUD who were treated several months with short acting MPH with individualized dosing. Adverse effects were rare. Keeping patients engaged in treatment in the first four weeks was critical for good clinical o…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/14659891.2015.1045047

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A gray literature search found several clinical guidelines on pharmacological options for agitation and psychosis, including from SAHMSA, AAFP, UNODC, and other international groups.

    “The gray literature search identified multiple clinical guidelines that address pharmacological options for management of agitation and psychosis, including guidance from SAHMSA, AAFP, UNODC, and other international guidelines (see Appendix G). 187,243,244”
  • This Guideline's recommendations rest on a review of existing guidelines and the clinical expertise of the CGC.

    “The recommendations in this Guideline are based on a review of existing guidelines and the clinical expertise of the CGC.184,244”
  • A gray literature search found several clinical guidelines covering behavioral and environmental approaches to calming patients, including from SAHMSA, AAFP, UNODC, and other international groups.

    “The gray literature search identified multiple clinical guidelines that discuss behavioral and environmental strategies to help keep patients calm, including guidance from SAHMSA, the American Association of Family Physicians (AAFP), the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), and other international guidelines.187,243,244”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00423.x · DOI
  2. Brenza J., 2014, Adiktologie, 14, 284
  3. Gabrhelík R., 2010, Adiktologie, 10, 92
  4. 10.1080/09595230801932588 · DOI
  5. Hampl K, 2004, Česká a Slovenská Psychiatrie, 100, 274
  6. 10.1080/09595230801914768 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/09595230801919494 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/add.12608 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/add.12109 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Minařík J., 2011, Adiktologie, 11, 48
  11. 10.1136/heart.89.5.577 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.drugpo.2010.12.001 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61097-0 · DOI
  14. 10.3109/14659899609084975 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/14651858.CD009695 · DOI
  16. 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.1.160 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/01.aids.0000327439.20914.33 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/002204260703700108 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Minařík, J., Gabrhelík, R., Malcolm, R., Pavlovská, A., & Miller, P.
Affiliations
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Gabrhelík, Roman
Venue
Journal of Substance Use
Published
2015-11-23
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
435-438
ISSN
  • 1465-9891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-9942
OpenAlex
W2326778709
Cited by
8
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Substance Use (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
methamphetamine dependence, treatment engagement, co-occurring psychiatric disorders, individualized dosing, treatment discontinuation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review