Cited by 414Selenium in Biological SystemsHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Toxicology of selenium: A review

Wilber, Charles G.·1980·Clinical Toxicology

Abstract

The concentration of selenium in soil, water, or minerals is site specific. World or regional averages are of little practical value. In one report from the front range area of Colorado, average selenium concentrations in bodies of standing water were from 0.3 to 15.8 micrograms Se per liter of water. In some aquatic organisms there is a strong correlation between the Se content of the water ant that of the body tissues; in others no such correlation obtains. Some organisms bioaccumulate Se by factors as high as 1300 to 3800. In most fish the amount of Se in the flesh seems to depend on the amount in the food taken in; there are exceptions, however. Aquatic organisms from seleniferous regions bioconcentrate selenium so as to reach total body levels of 60 micrograms Se per gram or up to 100 micrograms Se per gram of liver. There seems to be no evidence for "biomagnification" of selenium by aquatic organisms. Selenium exerts a strong protective action against the poisoning effects of many heavy metals (lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury, for example) and of some organic toxicants (paraquat, for example) in birds, mammals, and man. Data on man are sketchy. Selenium is released into the environment from the burning of coal. No identifiable hazard to man or to plants and animals useful to man can, at this time, be attributed to this source. Selenium is poisonous to man and animal in large amounts. It is a necessary micronutrient for many animals in small amounts; it may also be a needed micronutrient for man, but the data are sparse. The usual American diet contains adequate selenium for human health. Occupational selenium poisoning is mostly accidental and rare.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/15563658008985076

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biomethylation is often regarded as a detoxification mechanism since methylated volatile Se species are less toxic than their inorganic precursors and volatilization offers a loss-mechanism of excess intracellular Se.

    “Traditionally, biomethylation is often regarded as a detoxification mechanism since the methylated volatile Se species are less toxic than their inorganic precursors [246] and because volatilization offers a loss-mechanism of excess intracellular Se.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilber, C. G.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wilber, Charles G.
Venue
Clinical Toxicology
Published
1980-01
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
171-230
ISSN
0009-9309 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086400957
Cited by
414
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Selenium in Biological Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
selenium toxicity, selenium bioaccumulation, aquatic organisms, biomagnification, heavy metal protection, paraquat, coal combustion
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Chemistry, Drug Interactions, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Pollutants, Fishes, Humans, Mercury Poisoning, Occupational Diseases, Plants, Rabbits, Selenium, Sheep, Soil, Swine, Teratogens, Chemical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review