The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticle exposure in Mytilus galloprovincialis gills and digestive gland
Abstract
Despite the wide use of nanoscale materials in several fields, some aspects of the nanoparticle behavior have to be still investigated. In this work, we faced the aspect of environmental effects of increasing concentrations of TiO2NPs using the Mytilus galloprovincialis as an animal model and carrying out a multidisciplinary approach to better explain the results. Bioaccumulation suggested that the gills and digestive gland are the most sensitive organs to TiO2NP exposure. Histological observations have evidenced an altered tissue organization and a consistent infiltration of hemocytes, as a consequence of the immune system activation, even though an increase in lipid peroxidation is uncertain and DNA damage became relevant only at high exposure dose (10 mg/L) or for longer exposure time (96 h). However, the over expression of SOD1 mRNA strengthen the concept that the toxicity of TiO2NPs could occur indirectly by ROS production. TEM analysis showed the presence of multilamellar bodies, RER fragmentation, and cytoplasmic vacuolization within relevant presence of dense granules, residual bodies, and lipid inclusions. These findings support the evidence of an initial inflammatory response by the cells of the target organs leading to apoptosis. In conclusion, we can state that certainly the exposure to TiO2NPs has affected our animal model from cellular to molecular levels. Interestingly, the same responses are caused by lower TiO2NP concentration and longer exposure time as well…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The chemokine IL-8 is another example: It is produced very early and can be defined as a relatively unspecific alert signal, which indicates local inflammation that can be extreme enough to induce cytotoxicity [149–152].”
From Particle toxicology and health - where are we? (2019) · cites this paper as [149]
Citations
Cites
Manufactured nanoparticles: their uptake and effects on fish—a mechanistic analysis
Handy, R. D., Henry, T. B., Scown, T. M., Johnston, B. D., & Tyler, C. R. (2008) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0205-1 · Cited by 447
Sunscreens with Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Nano-Particles: A Societal Experiment
Jacobs, J. F., van de Poel, I., & Osseweijer, P. (2010) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0090-y · Cited by 129
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- 10.1562/0031-8655(2001)074<0656:THOPAP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1039/b807453d · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.05.010 · DOI
- 10.1155/2013/314091 · DOI
- 10.2217/nnm.12.187 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10646-008-0208-y · DOI
- 10.1080/15287399009531402 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470744307.gat240 · DOI
- 10.1021/es050090d · DOI
- 10.1007/s11051-013-1684-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.12.012 · DOI
- Cabiscol E, 2000, Int Microbiol, 3, 3
- Cai R, 1992, Cancer Res, 52, 2346
- 10.1016/0141-1136(84)90038-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.03.030 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.04.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cbpc.2014.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1006/jipa.1997.4670 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781118856017.ch13 · DOI
- 10.1002/jat.1609 · DOI
- 10.1002/chem.200305453 · DOI
- 10.1021/nl052396o · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0036937 · DOI
- 10.1080/11250003.2013.878400 · DOI
- 10.3109/17435390.2013.807446 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0062970 · DOI
- Davis JMG, 1991, Int J Exp Pathol, 72, 501
- 10.1021/es900249m · DOI
- 10.1007/s00216-008-2458-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.11.013 · DOI
- 10.1289/ehp.8006 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470747803.ch15 · DOI
- 10.1186/1743-8977-6-35 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.07.014 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja057712f · DOI
- 10.1897/08-090.1 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00397254 · DOI
- 10.1179/135100001101536463 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/MNANO.2012.2222519 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.08.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1381-5148(02)00197-9 · DOI
- 10.1006/jipa.1996.4639 · DOI
- 10.1039/b818082b · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0030321 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envint.2014.01.012 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00118870 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2006.06.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.006 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1970.0035 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.02218-06 · DOI
- 10.1080/17435390701644399 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.851 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00792.x · DOI
- 10.1021/es062572a · DOI
- 10.3109/17435390.2013.796538 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2202-11-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0887-2333(02)00041-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.marenvres.2009.05.002 · DOI
- Widdows J, 1995, Mar Environ Res, 127, 131
- 10.1038/nature06964 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.11.013 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Particle toxicology and health - where are we?
Riediker, M., Zink, D., Kreyling, W., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Graham, U., Lynch, I., Duschl, A., Ichihara, G., Ichihara, S., et al. (2019) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-019-0302-8 · Cited by 237
Narwal, N., Katyal, D., Kataria, N., Rose, P. K., Warkar, S. G., Pugazhendhi, A., Ghotekar, S., & Khoo, K. S. (2023) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139945 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Gornati, R., Longo, A., Rossi, F., Maisano, M., Sabatino, G., Mauceri, A., Bernardini, G., & Fasulo, S.
- Venue
- Nanotoxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-02-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 807-817
- ISSN
- 1743-5390
- 1743-5404
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review