Cited by 129Nanotechnology research and applicationsNanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsRisk Perception and Management

Sunscreens with Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Nano-Particles: A Societal Experiment

Open access
Jacobs, Johannes F., van de Poel, Ibo, Osseweijer, Patricia·2010·NanoEthics

Abstract

The risks of novel technologies, such as nano(bio)technology cannot be fully assessed due to the existing uncertainties surrounding their introduction into society. Consequently, the introduction of innovative technologies can be conceptualised as a societal experiment, which is a helpful approach to evaluate moral acceptability. This approach is illustrated with the marketing of sunscreens containing nano-sized titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) particles. We argue that the marketing of this TiO(2) nanomaterial in UV protective cosmetics is ethically undesirable, since it violates four reasonable moral conditions for societal experimentation (absence of alternatives, controllability, limited informed consent, and continuing evaluation). To remedy the current way nano-sized TiO(2) containing sunscreens are utilised, we suggest five complementing actions (closing the gap, setup monitoring tools, continuing review, designing for safety, and regulative improvements) so that its marketing can become more acceptable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11569-010-0090-y

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobs, J. F., van de Poel, I., & Osseweijer, P.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Jacobs, Johannes F.
Venue
NanoEthics
Published
2010-06-20
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
103-113
ISSN
  • 1871-4757 (ISSN-L)
  • 1871-4765
OpenAlex
W2138754853
Cited by
129
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • NanoEthics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanotechnology research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
titanium dioxide nanoparticles, moral acceptability, nanotechnology risks, informed consent, nanomaterial regulation, design for safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review