Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gold nanoparticles cellular toxicity and recovery: Effect of size, concentration and exposure time

Mironava, Tatsiana, Hadjiargyrou, Michael, Simon, Marcia, Jurukovski, Vladimir, Rafailovich, Miriam H.·2010·Nanotoxicology

Abstract

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are used in many applications; however, their interactions with cells and potential health risk(s) are not fully known. In this manuscript, we describe the interactions of AuNPs with human dermal fibroblasts and show that they can penetrate the plasma membrane and accumulate in large vacuoles. We also demonstrate that the uptake of the AuNPs is a function of time, their size and concentration. Specifically, we demonstrate that 45 nm AuNPs penetrate cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis, while the smaller 13 nm enter mostly via phagocytosis. Furthermore, we provide evidence of cytoskeleton filament disruption as a result of AuNPs exposure and reconstitution during recovery (following AuNP removal), despite no changes in actin or beta-tubulin protein levels. In contrast, the expression of the extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, collagen and fibronectin, was diminished in the cells exposed to AuNPs. We also examined the proliferation rates of cells exposed to AuNPs and show that its diminution is a function of apoptosis and speculate that apoptosis results from the number of vacuoles present in the cells, which is probably the main factor that disrupts the cytoskeleton causing cell area contraction and decreases in motility. Lastly, we also present data that indicates that AuNPs' damage to cells is not permanent and that the cells can completely recover as a function of AuNPs' size, concentration and exposure time. Taken together, our data suggest that AuNPs exert detrimental effects on cell function that could reverse following AuNPs removal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17435390903471463

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Supported gold nanoparticles as catalysts for organic reactions

    Corma, A., & Garcia, H. (2008) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b707314n · Cited by 1,883 · cited 1×

    “AuNPs play important roles in the fabrication of nanowires, in nanomedicine, and nanoelectronics, where the tolerance for oxidative reactions is very low (Chan 2007; Narayanan and El-Sayed 2007; Huang et al. 2007a; Corma and Garcia 2008; Nanotech Full Report 2008).”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
Mironava, T., Hadjiargyrou, M., Simon, M., Jurukovski, V., & Rafailovich, M. H.
Venue
Nanotoxicology
Published
2010-02-26
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
120-137
ISSN
  • 1743-5390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-5404
OpenAlex
W1986076794
Cited by
395
References
1
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gold nanoparticles cellular toxicity and recovery: Effect of size, concentration and exposure time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/17435390903471463
The paper
Mironava, T., Hadjiargyrou, M., Simon, M., Jurukovski, V., & Rafailovich, M. H. (2010). Gold nanoparticles cellular toxicity and recovery: Effect of size, concentration and exposure time. Nanotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390903471463

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.