The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gold nanoparticles cellular toxicity and recovery: Effect of size, concentration and exposure time
Abstract
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are used in many applications; however, their interactions with cells and potential health risk(s) are not fully known. In this manuscript, we describe the interactions of AuNPs with human dermal fibroblasts and show that they can penetrate the plasma membrane and accumulate in large vacuoles. We also demonstrate that the uptake of the AuNPs is a function of time, their size and concentration. Specifically, we demonstrate that 45 nm AuNPs penetrate cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis, while the smaller 13 nm enter mostly via phagocytosis. Furthermore, we provide evidence of cytoskeleton filament disruption as a result of AuNPs exposure and reconstitution during recovery (following AuNP removal), despite no changes in actin or beta-tubulin protein levels. In contrast, the expression of the extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, collagen and fibronectin, was diminished in the cells exposed to AuNPs. We also examined the proliferation rates of cells exposed to AuNPs and show that its diminution is a function of apoptosis and speculate that apoptosis results from the number of vacuoles present in the cells, which is probably the main factor that disrupts the cytoskeleton causing cell area contraction and decreases in motility. Lastly, we also present data that indicates that AuNPs' damage to cells is not permanent and that the cells can completely recover as a function of AuNPs' size, concentration and exposure time. Taken together, our data suggest that AuNPs exert detrimental effects on cell function that could reverse following AuNPs removal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Supported gold nanoparticles as catalysts for organic reactions
Corma, A., & Garcia, H. (2008) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b707314n · Cited by 1,883 · cited 1×
“AuNPs play important roles in the fabrication of nanowires, in nanomedicine, and nanoelectronics, where the tolerance for oxidative reactions is very low (Chan 2007; Narayanan and El-Sayed 2007; Huang et al. 2007a; Corma and Garcia 2008; Nanotech Full Report 2008).”
Background
Cited by
Engineered nanoparticles interacting with cells: size matters
Shang, L., Nienhaus, K., & Nienhaus, G. U. (2014) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/1477-3155-12-5 · Cited by 1,316
Autophagy and lysosomal dysfunction as emerging mechanisms of nanomaterial toxicity
Stern, S. T., Adiseshaiah, P. P., & Crist, R. M. (2012) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-9-20 · Cited by 836
Soenen, S. J., Rivera-Gil, P., Montenegro, J.-M., Parak, W. J., De Smedt, S. C., & Braeckmans, K. (2011) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2011.08.001 · Cited by 699
Hühn, D., Kantner, K., Geidel, C., Brandholt, S., De Cock, I., Soenen, S. J. H., Rivera_Gil, P., Montenegro, J.-M., Braeckmans, K., Müllen, K., et al. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn3059295 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Mironava, T., Hadjiargyrou, M., Simon, M., Jurukovski, V., & Rafailovich, M. H.
- Venue
- Nanotoxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-02-26
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-137
- ISSN
- 1743-5390 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-5404
- OpenAlex
- W1986076794
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gold nanoparticles cellular toxicity and recovery: Effect of size, concentration and exposure time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/17435390903471463
- The paper
- Mironava, T., Hadjiargyrou, M., Simon, M., Jurukovski, V., & Rafailovich, M. H. (2010). Gold nanoparticles cellular toxicity and recovery: Effect of size, concentration and exposure time. Nanotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390903471463
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.