Cited by 57Technology Use by Older AdultsNursing care and researchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The results from a two-year case study of an information and communication technology support system for family caregivers

Lundberg, Stefan·2014·Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim was to better understand how information and communication technology (ICT) can provide support to elderly family caregivers caring for significant others suffering from dementia or stroke. METHOD: Ten households equipped with an ICT system, with a family caregiver and a spouse diagnosed with dementia or stroke, were followed and observed in a two-year case study. The family caregivers had regular meetings in groups organised by the municipal care of the elderly. Data from observations, semi-structured interviews, user data from the ICT system and data about the support provided by the municipality has been used to validate the findings. RESULTS: The family caregivers socialised with users in the group as long as the users were stayed in the group. Meetings in the group were an important opportunity for exchanging experiences and to easing one"s mind. The ICT system did not reduce the municipality"s level of services to the participating families. The information built into the system has to be constantly updated to be of interest. CONCLUSIONS: An ICT support must be provided in a context of personal meetings and with a formal caregiver backing. This will empower informal or family caregivers. Such support must give the user the possibility to communicate and get access to the Internet. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Benefits were obtained when informal caregivers met with a group of people with whom they share the same kind of experiences and were supported by a formal caregiver. Informal caregivers need more attention and recognition. ICT systems can help but must be current and maintain the users interest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17483107.2013.814170

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lundberg, S.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Lundberg, Stefan
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
Published
2013-07-15
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
353-358
ISSN
  • 1748-3107 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3115
OpenAlex
W2008091959
Cited by
57
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
12.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
family caregivers, information and communication technologies, dementia, stroke, informal caregivers, caregiver support groups, municipal care services, caregiver empowerment, social support, user-generated content, assistive technology
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Social Support, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Caregivers, Internet, Stroke, Videoconferencing, Health Communication, Health Information Exchange

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review