Cited by 25Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older Adults

A novel multimodal tool for telemonitoring patients with COPD

Sánchez-Morillo, Daniel, Crespo, Mario, León, Antonio, Crespo Foix, Luis F.·2015·Informatics for Health and Social Care

Abstract

Introduction: Among factors that underlie high rates of non-participation reported in telehealth interventions are the low older users' acceptance of information technologies and the low levels of non-compliance with therapy of chronic patients. Therefore, inclusion of potential users into design stages of assistive technologies is challenging. In this paper, the design, implementation and evaluation of a multimodal mobile application for telemonitoring chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is presented. The goal of the study was to assess the usability and feasibility of the designed tool. Methods: An iterative user-centered design methodology was applied to implement a prototype that satisfied users' requirements. Feasibility (compliance, COPD knowledge and satisfaction) of the application was assessed in a 6-month field trial with COPD patients. Results: A usable, effective and efficient prototype was released after the development process. A high compliance (86.1%) and an increasing in COPD knowledge were achieved in the field trial. Conclusions: The findings reveal the importance of integrating usability in the design development processes to improve adherence to routine tasks and to reduce the high rates of non-participation reported in recent evaluation studies of telehealth interventions. The presented tool can help to recognize early symptoms of deterioration and to support patients in COPD self-management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17538157.2013.872114

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sánchez-Morillo, D., Crespo, M., León, A., & Crespo Foix, L. F.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar (ES)
Venue
Informatics for Health and Social Care
Published
2013-12-31
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 1753-8157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-8165
OpenAlex
W2024003003
Cited by
25
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Informatics for Health and Social Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, remote patient monitoring, COPD self-management, usability, user-centered design, assistive technology, older adults, medication adherence, COPD knowledge, early symptom detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review