CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Survey Methodology and NonresponseHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does mode of administration affect health-related quality-of-life outcomes after stroke?

Caute, Anna, Northcott, Sarah, Clarkson, Lisa, Pring, Tim, Hilari, Katerina·2012·International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
DOI 10.3109/17549507.2012.663789
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Telephone interviews and postal surveys may be a resource-efficient way of assessing health-related quality-of-life post-stroke, if they produce data equivalent to face-to-face interviews. This study explored whether telephone interviews and postal surveys of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39g) yielded similar results to face-to-face interviews. Participants included people with aphasia and comprised two groups: group one (n =22) were 3-6 months post-stroke; group two (n =26) were ≥1 year post-stroke. They completed either a face-to-face and a telephone interview or a face-to-face interview and a postal survey of the SAQOL-39g. Response rates were higher for group two (87%) than for group one (72-77%). There were no significant differences between respondents and non-respondents on demographics, co-morbidities, stroke severity, or communication impairment. Concordance between face-to-face and telephone administrations (.90-.98) was excellent; and very good-excellent between face-to-face and postal administrations (.84-.96), although scores in postal administrations were lower (significant for psychosocial domain and overall SAQOL-39g in group two). These findings suggest that the SAQOL-39g yields similar results in different modes of administration. Researchers and clinicians may employ alternative modes, particularly in the longer term post-stroke, in order to reduce costs or facilitate clients with access difficulties.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17549507.2012.663789

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Brott T, 1989, Stroke, 20, 964
  2. Damasio A. R, 1991, Acquired aphasia, 27
  3. Duncan P. W, 2005, MedCare, 43, 507
  4. Enderby P, 1987, Windsor: NFER-Nelson
  5. Lawson R, 1999, The aphasia therapy file, 61
  6. Royal College of Physicians, 2008, Report prepared by the intercollegiate working party for stroke

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Caute, A., Northcott, S., Clarkson, L., Pring, T., & Hilari, K.
Affiliations
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Hilari, Katerina
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
329-337
ISSN
  • 1441-7049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-9507
  • 1754-9515
DOI
10.3109/17549507.2012.663789
OpenAlex
W2164942241
Cited by
13
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
health-related quality of life, stroke, aphasia, mode of administration, telephone interviews, mail surveys, face-to-face interviews, response rate, psychosocial functioning
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aphasia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Speech Intelligibility, Time Factors, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review