Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,833

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index

·2001·Classic Papers in Rheumatology

Abstract

The clinical assessment of disease activity in patients with AS is often not easy. A few functional indices have now been developed for longitudinal follow-up of AS patients, and for monitoring their response to therapy. The most widely used measures of functional capacity in AS is the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI) (score 0-10). Disease activity has been assessed by using a self-administered composite index called the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) that consists of an evaluation on a visual analogue scale (from 0-10) focusing on axial pain, peripheral joint pain, fatigue/tiredness, enthesitis, and morning stiffness). BASDAI has been found to be a valid and appropriate composite to define disease activity in AS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/9780203214237-70

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,833

Metadata

Venue
Classic Papers in Rheumatology
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2001-12-06
Pages
142-145
OpenAlex
W3135506742
Cited by
1,833
References
0
FWCI
94.95
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/9780203214237-70
The paper
A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. (2001). Classic Papers in Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.3109/9780203214237-70

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.