Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 626

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals

Open access
·2012·Dermatotoxicology

Abstract

Other methods and guidelines not included in this publication may be judged to be appropriate in testing chemicals in certain scientifi c, legal, and administrative contexts. The OECD Council Decision on Mutual Acceptance of Data (12th May 1981; C[81]30) affi rms that data generated in one country in accordance with the OECD Test Guidelines – and additionally in accordance with the OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice – should be accepted in OECD countries for purposes of assessment and other uses relating to protection of man and the environment. The full text of this Decision and the OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice may be found in the Appendix to the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/9781841848570-66

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 626

Metadata

Venue
Dermatotoxicology
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2012-09-27
Pages
509-511
OpenAlex
W2504927798
Cited by
626
References
0
FWCI
105.60
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/9781841848570-66
The paper
OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals. (2012). Dermatotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.3109/9781841848570-66

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.