The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization
Abstract
This book documents the first serious attempt to construct automatically and use nonsemantic computational structures for text summarization. Until now, most discourse researchers have assumed that full semantic understanding is necessary to derive the discourse structure of texts. This book documents the first serious attempt to construct automatically and use nonsemantic computational structures for text summarization. Daniel Marcu develops a semantics-free theoretical framework that is both general enough to be applicable to naturally occurring texts and concise enough to facilitate an algorithmic approach to discourse analysis. He presents and evaluates two discourse parsing methods: one uses manually written rules that reflect common patterns of usage of cue phrases such as "however" and "in addition to"; the other uses rules that are learned automatically from a corpus of discourse structures. By means of a psycholinguistic experiment, Marcu demonstrates how a discourse-based summarizer identifies the most important parts of texts at levels of performance that are close to those of humans. Marcu also discusses how the automatic derivation of discourse structures may be used to improve the performance of current natural language generation, machine translation, summarization, question answering, and information retrieval systems. Bradford Books imprint
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization
MANN, W. C., & THOMPSON, S. A. (1988) · Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse · doi:10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243 · Cited by 3,853
Cited by
Soylent: a word processor with a crowd inside
Bernstein, M. S., Little, G., Miller, R. C., Hartmann, B., Ackerman, M. S., Karger, D. R., Crowell, D., & Panovich, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/1866029.1866078 · Cited by 686
Rhetorical Structure Theory: looking back and moving ahead
Taboada, M., & Mann, W. C. (2006) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445606061881 · Cited by 451
An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations
Marcu, D., & Echihabi, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '02 · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073145 · Cited by 382
Self-citationThe Pyramid Method: Incorporating human content selection variation in summarization evaluation
Nenkova, A., Passonneau, R., & McKeown, K. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1145/1233912.1233913 · Cited by 307
Everything you always wanted to know about a dataset: Studies in data summarisation
Koesten, L., Simperl, E., Blount, T., Kacprzak, E., & Tennison, J. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.10.004 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcu, D.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2000-11-08
- OpenAlex
- W1597655096
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/6754.001.0001
- The paper
- Marcu, D. (2000). The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization. The MIT Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6754.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.