The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An effective two-stage model for exploiting non-local dependencies in named entity recognition
Open accessAbstract
This paper shows that a simple two-stage approach to handle non-local dependencies in Named Entity Recognition (NER) can outperform existing approaches that handle non-local dependencies, while being much more computationally efficient. NER systems typically use sequence models for tractable inference, but this makes them unable to capture the long distance structure present in text. We use a Conditional Random Field (CRF) based NER system using local features to make predictions and then train another CRF which uses both local information and features extracted from the output of the first CRF. Using features capturing non-local dependencies from the same document, our approach yields a 12.6% relative error reduction on the F1 score, over state-of-the-art NER systems using local-information alone, when compared to the 9.3% relative error reduction offered by the best systems that exploit non-local information. Our approach also makes it easy to incorporate non-local information from other documents in the test corpus, and this gives us a 13.3% error reduction over NER systems using local-information alone. Additionally, our running time for inference is just the inference time of two sequential CRFs, which is much less than that directly model the dependencies and do approximate inference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2010) · Cited by 1,906
Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition
Ratinov, L., & Roth, D. (2009) · Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning - CoNLL '09 · doi:10.3115/1596374.1596399 · Cited by 1,448
Sarawagi, S. (2008) · Foundations and Trends in Databases · doi:10.1561/1900000003 · Cited by 707
The Graph of Things: A step towards the Live Knowledge Graph of connected things
Le-Phuoc, D., Nguyen Mau Quoc, H., Ngo Quoc, H., Tran Nhat, T., & Hauswirth, M. (2016) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2016.02.003 · Cited by 81
Named entity recognition for tweets
Liu, X., Wei, F., Zhang, S., & Zhou, M. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/2414425.2414428 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishnan, V., & Manning, C. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the ACL - ACL '06
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 1121-1128
- OpenAlex
- W2117813082
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An effective two-stage model for exploiting non-local dependencies in named entity recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/1220175.1220316
- The paper
- Krishnan, V., & Manning, C. D. (2006). An effective two-stage model for exploiting non-local dependencies in named entity recognition. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the ACL - ACL '06. https://doi.org/10.3115/1220175.1220316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.