Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extracting personal names from email: applying named entity recognition to informal text

Open access
Minkov, Einat, Wang, Richard C., Cohen, William W.·2005·Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - HLT '05

Abstract

There has been little prior work on Named Entity Recognition for "informal" documents like email. We present two methods for improving performance of person name recognizers for email: email-specific structural features and a recall-enhancing method which exploits name repetition across multiple documents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/1220575.1220631

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Minkov, E., Wang, R. C., & Cohen, W. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - HLT '05
Published
2005
Pages
443-450
OpenAlex
W2056354103
Cited by
161
References
0
FWCI
5.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extracting personal names from email: applying named entity recognition to informal text. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/1220575.1220631
The paper
Minkov, E., Wang, R. C., & Cohen, W. W. (2005). Extracting personal names from email: applying named entity recognition to informal text. Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - HLT '05. https://doi.org/10.3115/1220575.1220631

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.