Cited by 187Primary Care and Health OutcomesHealth and Medical Research ImpactsHealth Sciences Research and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Short History of Primary Care Practice-based Research Networks: From Concept to Essential Research Laboratories

Open access
Green, L. A., Hickner, J.·2006·The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Abstract

Sail forth—steer for the deep waters only, reckless O Soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me, for we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go, and we will risk the ship, ourselves and all. —Walt Whitman This is a story about the evolution of practice-based research networks (

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3122/jabfm.19.1.1

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hames CG. Evans County cardiovascular and cere- brovascular epidemiologic study. Arch Intern Med 1971;128:883-6.
  2. The National Influenza Surveillance Working Party. Canadian influenza surveillance first report: methods of the national recording system. Can Fam Physician 1977;23:64 -72.
  3. Green LA, Simmons RL, Reed FM, et al. A family medicine information system: the beginning of a network for practicing and residency family physi- cians. J Fam Pract 1978;7:567-76.
  4. Ornstein S, Jenkins RG, Nietert PJ, et al. A multi- method quality improvement intervention to im- prove preventive cardiovascular care: a cluster ran- domized trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:523-32. Summary for patients. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141: I53.
  5. Report of the Graylin Consensus Development Conference. November 20 -22, Graylin, NC. Washington (DC): Association of American Med- ical Colleges. November 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Green, L. A., & Hickner, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Health (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 1557-2625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-7118
OpenAlex
W2134927115
Cited by
187
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 21
FWCI
22.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
practice-based research networks, primary care research, research infrastructure, family medicine research
MeSH terms
Family Practice, Humans, Laboratories, Primary Health Care, Research Support as Topic, United States, Biomedical Research, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review