Cited by 918Health and Medical Research ImpactsResearch, Science, and AcademiaInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

The NIH Roadmap

Zerhouni, Elias·2003·Science

Abstract

The NIH Roadmap is a set of bold initiatives aimed at accelerating medical research. These initiatives will address challenges that no single NIH institute could tackle alone, but the agency as a whole must undertake. The Roadmap identifies the most compelling opportunities in three arenas: new pathways to discovery, research teams of the future, and reengineering the clinical research enterprise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1091867

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impetus to blend or explicitly link research traditions in the service of accelerating scientific progress and enhancing public health impact is not at all new, and the idea of blending clinical effectiveness and implementation research elements is also not new.

    “The impetus to blend or explicitly link research traditions in the service of accelerating scientific progress and enhancing public health impact is not at all new,4,38–40 and the idea of blending clinical effectiveness and implementation research elements is also not new.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zerhouni, E.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Zerhouni, Elias
Venue
Science
Published
2003-10-03
Volume
302
Issue
5642
Pages
63-72
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1496826797
Cited by
918
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
NIH Roadmap, National Institutes of Health, research infrastructure, research groups, research pathways, biomedical research policy
MeSH terms
Budgets, Clinical Trials as Topic, Financing, Government, Humans, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Research Support as Topic, United States, Private Sector, Public Sector, Advisory Committees, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review