Cited by 58Primary Care and Health OutcomesHealth Sciences Research and EducationHealth Policy Implementation Science

Supporting Better Science in Primary Care: A Description of Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) in 2011

Open access
Peterson, K. A., Lipman, P. D., Lange, C. J., Cohen, R. A., Durako, S.·2012·The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bound by a shared commitment to improving medical care through systematic inquiry, practice-based research networks (PBRNs) provide a basic laboratory for primary care research and dissemination. METHODS: Data from US primary care PBRNs were collected as part of the 2011 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality PBRN registration process. Data addressed PBRN characteristics, research activities, and perceived strengths and weaknesses. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three primary care PBRNs were registered with the resource center in 2011, including 131 that were identified as either eligible for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recognition (n = 121) or as developing (n = 10). These PBRNs included 12,981 practices with more than 63,000 individual members providing care to approximately 47.5 million people. PBRNs had an average of 482 individual members (median, 170) from 101 practices (median, 32). CONCLUSIONS: PBRNs are growing in experience and research capacity. With member practices serving approximately 15% of the US population, PBRNs are adopting more advanced study designs, disseminating and implementing practice change, and participating in clinical trials. PBRNs provide valuable capacity for investigating questions of importance to clinical practice, disseminating results, and implementing evidence-based strategies. PBRNs are well positioned to support the emerging public health role of primary care providers and provide an essential component of a learning health care system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.120100

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reports of PBRN performance metrics are rare for both medical and dental PBRNs, and have primarily focused on the number of studies completed and the number of participants involved.

    “Indeed, reports of PBRN performance metrics are rare for both medical and dental PBRNs, and have primarily focused on the number of studies completed and the number of participants involved [6,14,15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peterson, K. A., Lipman, P. D., Lange, C. J., Cohen, R. A., & Durako, S.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Published
2012-09-01
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
565-571
ISSN
  • 1557-2625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-7118
OpenAlex
W2154043715
Cited by
58
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSA-290-2007-10037)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
practice-based research networks, primary care research, research capacity, research dissemination, evidence-based practice implementation, clinical trials, learning healthcare systems, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, primary care practices
MeSH terms
Family Practice, Health Services Research, Humans, Primary Health Care, United States, Community Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review