The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Physicians’ Experiences With Telemedicine During COVID-19
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Primary care practices rapidly adopted telemedicine visits because of the COVID-19 pandemic, but information on physician perspectives about these visits is lacking. METHODS: Fifteen semistructured interviews with practicing primary care physicians and physicians-in-training from a Southern California academic health system and group-model health maintenance organization were conducted to assess physician perspectives regarding the benefits and challenges of telemedicine. RESULTS: Physicians indicated that telemedicine improved patient access to care by providing greater convenience, although some expressed concern that certain groups of vulnerable patients were unable to navigate or did not possess the technology required to participate in telemedicine visits. Physicians noted that telemedicine visits offered more time for patient counseling, opportunities for better medication reconciliations, and the ability to see and evaluate patient home environments and connect with patient families. Challenges existed when visits required a physical examination. Physicians were very concerned about the loss of personal connections and touch, which they believed diminished expected rituals that typically strengthen physician-patient relationships. Physicians also observed that careful consideration to physician workflows may be needed to avoid physician burnout. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians reported that telemedicine visits offer new opportunities to improve the quality of patient care but noted changes to their interactions with patients. Many of these changes are positive, but it remains to be seen whether others such as lack of physical examination and loss of physical presence and touch adversely influence provider-patient communication, patient willingness to disclose concerns that may affect their care, and, ultimately, patient health outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x05279903 · Cited by 20,808
S., N. L. (2017) · doi:10.1177/1609406917733847 · Cited by 14,051
Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature
Ong, L. M. L., de Haes, J. C. J. M., Hoos, A. M., & Lammes, F. B. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-m · Cited by 2,430
Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis
Kruse, C. S., Krowski, N., Rodriguez, B., Tran, L., Vela, J., & Brooks, M. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016242 · Cited by 1,350
Covid-19 and Health Care’s Digital Revolution
Keesara, S., Jonas, A., & Schulman, K. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2005835 · Cited by 1,126
Patients’ Satisfaction with and Preference for Telehealth Visits
Polinski, J. M., Barker, T., Gagliano, N., Sussman, A., Brennan, T. A., & Shrank, W. H. (2016) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3489-x · Cited by 574
Review of key telepsychiatry outcomes
Hubley, S., Lynch, S. B., Schneck, C., Thomas, M., & Shore, J. (2016) · World Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.5498/wjp.v6.i2.269 · Cited by 492
Patient Perceptions of Telehealth Primary Care Video Visits
Powell, R. E., Henstenburg, J. M., Cooper, G., Hollander, J. E., & Rising, K. L. (2017) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2095 · Cited by 465
O'Reilly, R., Bishop, J., Maddox, K., Hutchinson, L., Fisman, M., & Takhar, J. (2007) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2007.58.6.836 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Formulating research questions for evidence-based studies
Hosseini, M.-S., Jahanshahlou, F., Akbarzadeh, M. A., Zarei, M., & Vaez-Gharamaleki, Y. (2024) · Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.glmedi.2023.100046 · Cited by 316
Breton, M., Sullivan, E. E., Deville-Stoetzel, N., McKinstry, D., DePuccio, M., Sriharan, A., Deslauriers, V., Dong, A., & McAlearney, A. S. (2021) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-021-01543-4 · Cited by 174
Use of E-Health in Dutch General Practice during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Keuper, J., Batenburg, R., Verheij, R., & van Tuyl, L. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182312479 · Cited by 32
Paredes-Angeles, R., Cavero, V., Vilela-Estrada, A. L., Cusihuaman-Lope, N., Villarreal-Zegarra, D., & Diez-Canseco, F. (2024) · SSM - Mental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100287 · Cited by 9
Equity and AI Governance at Academic Medical Centers
(2024) · The American Journal of Managed Care · doi:10.37765/ajmc.2024.89555 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Gomez, T., Anaya, Y. B., Shih, K. J., & Tarn, D. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- Supplement
- Pages
- S61-S70
- ISSN
- 1557-2625 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7118
- OpenAlex
- W3130122346
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 52.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Physicians’ Experiences With Telemedicine During COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3122/jabfm.2021.s1.200517
- The paper
- Gomez, T., Anaya, Y. B., Shih, K. J., & Tarn, D. M. (2021). A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Physicians’ Experiences With Telemedicine During COVID-19. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.s1.200517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.