PreprintCited by 12Indigenous Peoples' Rights and LawCriminal Law and PolicyIndigenous Cultures and History

Crime and Governance in Indian Country

Open access
RIley, Angela R.·2017

Abstract

Criminal jurisdiction in Indian country is defined by a central, ironic paradox. Recent federal laws expanding tribal criminal jurisdiction are, in many respects, enormous victories for Indian country, as they acknowledge and reify a more robust notion of tribal sovereignty, one capable of accommodating increased tribal control over safety and security on Indian reservations. At the same time, the laws make clear that sovereignty comes at a price, potentially working to effectuate further assimilation of tribal courts and Indian people. As a result, at the same time that tribal sovereignty gains ground in ways critical to autonomy and self-governance, it is simultaneously threatened by exogenous forces that have the potential to homogenize tribal justice systems legally, politically, and—in particular—culturally.This Article offers the first comprehensive assessment of the Tribal Law and Order Act and the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, respectively, to show how they relate to one another on the ground and the implications for tribal sovereignty and self-determination. Ultimately, based on data compiled for the first time as well as extensive secondary sources, I argue that expanded criminal jurisdiction and punishment authority have, perhaps paradoxically, enhanced the ability of tribes to develop and enforce policies, laws, and procedures that are consistent with tribal custom and tradition. This presents a unique opportunity worthy of further exploration. In other words, rather than sovereignty and assimilation expanding in tension with one another, I find that the application of the laws has been experienced in tribal communities, as least anecdotally and preliminarily, as greatly enhancing—not threatening or destroying—tribal sovereignty and Indian cultural survival.Published: Angela R. Riley, "Crime and Governance in Indian Country," 63 UCLA Law Review 1564 (2016).

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This Article offers the first comprehensive assessment of the Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010 and the 2013 reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, arguing that expanded tribal criminal jurisdiction has enhanced tribal sovereignty and cultural survival even as it imposes federal procedural requirements that risk assimilation. Based on VAWA pilot-project case files and secondary/aggregated data, it finds preliminary evidence that implementation improved safety and defendant protections, while urging tribes to use expanded authority to experiment with indigenous restorative justice.

Key findings

  • TLOA and VAWA expand tribal criminal authority but condition it on procedural protections aligned with the U.S. Constitution; the paper frames this as a paradox or “double bind” in which sovereignty gains may also bring assimilative pressure.
  • During the VAWA pilot project, only five tribes were certified for special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction, and only three initiated prosecutions; there were 28 VAWA cases involving 24 offenders, most resolved by guilty pleas, with only one trial, which resulted in acquittal. No non-Indian defendant filed a writ of habeas corpus.
  • TLOA data were opaque, but the paper estimates approximately 30 to 40 TLOA prosecutions during the relevant period, with felony sentencing applied in at least a dozen cases; tribes that were TLOA compliant did not seek enhanced sentencing in any VAWA prosecution.
  • Non-Indian domestic violence was a significant problem: it comprised up to 25 percent of all domestic violence cases on the reservation; at Pascua Yaqui, 25 percent of domestic violence cases involved non-Indian defendants, and 15 non-Indian defendants had more than 80 documented prior tribal police contacts; at CTUIR, 29 percent of domestic violence perpetrators in 2011 and 61 percent in 2012 were non-Indian.

Methods

  • The author obtained the files from all tribal court VAWA prosecutions during the statutorily defined pilot project window and draws on those case files, extensive secondary sources, and aggregated data.
  • The study examines TLOA prosecutions from July 29, 2010, until the close of the VAWA pilot project on March 6, 2015; VAWA was reauthorized on March 7, 2013, and the pilot project ran from February 6, 2014, to March 6, 2015.
  • Analysis is organized around three themes—tribal sovereignty versus assimilation, individual versus collective rights, and tribal punishment—and advances a normative proposal for indigenous restorative justice. TLOA analysis relies almost entirely on secondary sources because there is no granular TLOA prosecution data.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it is too early to draw broad conclusions from the limited data, including a very small sample size; TLOA data are not granular, tribes neither identified nor catalogued TLOA cases, and there is a severe paucity of data collection and no comparative baseline.
  • The paper states that findings are anecdotal and preliminary, and that historical statistics are not available for declination rates of non-Indian crimes, so no viable comparison point exists.
  • Evident from the text: the VAWA findings rest on only three prosecuting tribes and 28 cases, with a single trial; the TLOA prosecution count is approximate; and the pilot tribes were already well-positioned for implementation—having law-trained judges, available counsel, and mixed jury pools—which limits generalizability to other tribes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31228/osf.io/3gks7

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 187 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Preliminary data reveal that the laws are improving the safety and security of reservation residents.

    “and the preliminary data reveal that the laws are improving the safety and security of reservation residents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Implementation of TLOA and VAWA has been a success in several respects.

    “First, I conclude that implementation has been a success in several respects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Tribes have provided defendants with the requisite procedural protections.

    “Tribes have provided defendants with the requisite procedural protections”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The application of the laws has been experienced in tribal communities, at least anecdotally and preliminarily, as greatly enhancing-not threatening or destroying-tribal sovereignty and Indian cultural survival.

    “In other words, rather than sovereignty and assimilation expanding in tension with one another, I find that the application of the laws has been experienced in tribal communities, as least anecdotally and preliminarily, as greatly enhancing-not threatening or destroyingtribal sovereignty and Indian cultural survival.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Reports show that the mandatory disclosure requirement has significantly improved declination rates since passage of the Act.

    “Reports show that the mandatory disclosure requirement has significantly improved declination rates since passage of the Act.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Williams, supra note 18

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 120
  • May combine two claims. 108
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    For some Indians, obligations to the tribe and ceremonial life may come before the particular rights of individuals.

    “For some Indians, obligations to the tribe and ceremonial life may come before the particular rights of individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    CTUIR acknowledges increases in reporting during the same period.

    “CTUIR similarly acknowledges increases in reporting during the same period.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    A federal district court has recently upheld the authority of the Secretary of Interior to take land into trust for Alaska Native villages, which could potentially positively impact the villages.

    “However, a federal district court has recently upheld the authority of the Secretary of Interior to take land into trust for Alaska Native villages, which could potentially positively impact the villages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Those tribes that implemented VAWA had to apply for approval to be included in the pilot project, and they did so in part because they already had in place many of the procedural mechanisms required under the statute.

    “Those tribes that implemented VAWA, for example, had to apply for approval to be included in the pilot project, and they did so in part because they already had in place many of the procedural mechanisms required under the statute.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    This tension has framed many of the conflicts in Indian law and policy for centuries.

    “This tension has framed many of the conflicts in Indian law and policy for centuries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    TLOA and VAWA both impose additional requirements onto tribes that do not otherwise bind them.

    “TLOA and VAWA both impose additional requirements onto tribes that do not otherwise bind them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Two of the offenders were convicted felons with Arizona criminal records.

    “Two of the offenders were convicted felons with Arizona criminal records.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Among the pilot project tribes, the right to counsel was readily available-in some cases, for anyone who requested a lawyer, regardless of indigent status-and this had been the practice for some time.

    “Similarly, among these tribes the right to counsel was readily available-in some cases, for anyone who requested a lawyer, regardless of indigent status-and this had been the practice for some time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Tribes see criminal authority as important because it fulfills a duty to protect tribal members and because it is a central assertion of sovereignty over territory, regardless of who is within territorial boundaries.

    “Tribes see this as important because it fulfills a duty to protect tribal members, but also because it is a central assertion of sovereignty over territory, regardless of who is within territorial boundaries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Many non-Indian defendants lived on the reservation at the time of their arrests, were married to Indians living on the reservation, or had children with tribal members.

    “Many lived on the reservation at the time of their arrests, were married to Indians living on the reservation, or had children with tribal members.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Those working in tribal criminal justice posit that the increase in reporting is because victims believe they are safer than before, and that their abusers will not automatically walk free due to jurisdictional loopholes.

    “Those working in tribal criminal justice posit that this is because victims believe they are safer than before, and that their abusers will not automatically walk free due to jurisdictional loopholes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Although many tribes have expressed a desire to implement TLOA or VAWA, most have not yet done so.

    “Although many tribes have expressed a desire to implement TLOA or VAWA, most have not yet done so.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    All of these incidences occurred on the reservation.

    “All of these incidences occurred on the reservation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Two of the non-Indian defendants had outstanding arrest warrants, one for armed robbery in the state of Oklahoma.

    “Two had outstanding arrest warrants, one for armed robbery in the state of Oklahoma.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Both TLOA and VAWA impose in various ways new standards onto tribes and encourage greater federal court review than existed previously.

    “Both statutes impose in various ways new standards onto tribes and encourage greater federal court review than existed previously.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Though there has been increased focus on data collection in Indian country in the last decade, sources are still scant.

    “Though there has been increased focus on data collection in Indian country in the last decade, sources are still scant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Scholars have long debated the question of the extent to which Indian tribes do-or ought to-appreciate and preference individual rights over collective rights.

    “Scholars have long debated the question of the extent to which Indian tribes do-or ought to-appreciate and preference individual rights over collective rights.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    People had begun to lose faith in the criminal justice system altogether, and this was true of both tribal and federal systems.

    “People had begun to lose faith in the criminal justice system altogether, and this was true of both tribal and federal systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Tribal members experienced the criminal justice system as futile and ineffective, and in many cases stopped calling law enforcement for help.

    “Tribal members experienced the criminal justice system as futile and ineffective, and, in many cases, even stopped calling law enforcement for help.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The perpetrators had deep ties to the tribal community.

    “The perpetrators had deep ties to the tribal community.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Historically, some tribal judges were selected because of their status as elders within the community, their deep cultural knowledge, or their standing in the tribe.

    “Historically, some tribal judges, for example, were selected because of their status as elders within the community, their deep cultural knowledge, or their standing in the tribe.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Prior to 2013, the pilot project tribes felt impotent in protecting tribal members, and the problem of domestic violence raised particular issues at places like Pascua Yaqui, where domestic violence is a large part of the criminal docket.

    “Research reveals that prior to 2013, the pilot project tribes felt impotent in protecting tribal members, and the problem of domestic violence raised particular issues at places like Pascua Yaqui, where domestic violence is a large part of the criminal docket.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Anathema to conceptions of Western liberalism, which put the individual at the center of rights frameworks, indigenous societies are oftentimes criticized for prioritizing tribal interests in this way.

    “Anathema to conceptions of Western liberalism, which put the individual at the center of rights frameworks, indigenous societies are oftentimes criticized for prioritizing tribal interests in this way.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Though there was a vast range in tribal cultures during the colonial period, a common thread among most indigenous communities, then and today, is a tightly cohesive sense of collective rights, responsibilities, and duties.

    “Though there was a vast range in tribal cultures during the colonial period, a common thread among most indigenous communities, then and today, is a tightly cohesive sense of collective rights, responsibilities, and duties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Tulalip states that since VAWA was reauthorized, reporting of domestic violence has gone up steadily.

    “Tulalip states, for example, that since VAWA was reauthorized, reporting of domestic violence has gone up steadily.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The tension between individual and collective rights as related to tribal communities has been evident virtually since contact between Natives and Europeans.

    “The tension between individual and collective rights as related to tribal communities has been evident virtually since contact between Natives and Europeans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The pilot project tribes point to the sharp increase in reporting of domestic violence as another sign that the laws are having a positive impact.

    “Similarly, the pilot project tribes point to the sharp increase in reporting of domestic violence as another sign that the laws are having a positive impact.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    During the period relevant to this study there is only one reported case of a constitutional challenge to a conviction under the TLOA, and it dealt with the question of retroactive application of TLOA's protections.

    “During the period relevant to this study there is only one reported case of a constitutional challenge to a conviction under the TLOA, and it dealt with the question of retroactive application of TLOA's protections.254”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites United States v. Bryant, 136 S. Ct. 1954 (2016)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The ICRA does not extend a mandatory right to counsel for indigent defendants to tribes, and, at the time of VAWA's reauthorization, some tribes continued to prosecute Indians without the aid of a lawyer.

    “As noted, the ICRA does not extend a mandatory right to counsel for indigent defendants to tribes, and, at the time of VAWA's reauthorization, some tribes continued to prosecute Indians without the aid of a lawyer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The guaranteed right to counsel for indigent defendants was debated vociferously leading up to the reauthorization of VAWA in particular because it would mark the first prosecution of non-Indians by tribal courts in almost forty years.

    “The guaranteed right to counsel for indigent defendants was debated vociferously leading up to the reauthorization of VAWA in particular because it would mark the first prosecution of non-Indians by tribal courts in almost forty years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Two features in particular garnered the greatest debate: the right to counsel for indigent defendants and the makeup of tribal juries.

    “But two features in particular garnered the greatest debate: the right to counsel for indigent defendants and the makeup of tribal juries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The system of prosecution, trial, and incarceration in Indian country today was established by federal governmental policies more than one hundred years ago, and the right to counsel is a central feature in the long and complex story of federal-tribal relations.

    “The system of prosecution, trial, and incarceration in Indian country today was established by federal governmental policies more than one hundred years ago, and the right to counsel is a central feature in the long and complex story of federal-tribal relations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Numerous parties asserted that they preferred tribal court to federal court, stating that the tribal process was less formal, less intimidating, offered more focus on treatment and showed more respect to defendants.

    “Numerous parties asserted that they preferred tribal court to federal court, stating that the tribal process was less formal, less intimidating, offered more focus on treatment and showed more respect to defendants.277”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leonhard, supra note 86

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The one case that went to trial, prosecuted by Pascua Yaqui, involved a same-sex domestic violence charge committed by one man against the other, who were in an intimate same-sex relationship according to the prosecution.

    “That case, prosecuted by Pascua Yaqui, involved a same-sex domestic violence charge committed by one man against the other, who were, according to the prosecution, in an intimate samesex relationship.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Virtually all of the prosecuting tribes employ some alternatives to incarceration, including diversion courts, batterer treatment programs, or other culturally relevant treatment programs.

    “Virtually all of the prosecuting tribes employ some alternatives to incarceration, including diversion courts, batterer treatment programs, or other culturally relevant treatment programs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The jury based its decision on its view that the prosecution had not sufficiently proven the existence of an intimate relationship between the two men, a requirement under VAWA.

    “The jury based its decision on its view that the prosecution had not sufficiently proven the existence of an intimate relationship between the two men, a requirement under VAWA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Both statutes encourage alternative sentencing, and tribes employed these procedures in numerous places.

    “Both statutes encourage alternative sentencing, and tribes employed these procedures in numerous places.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leonhard, supra note 86

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In other VAWA cases, charges were filed but subsequently dismissed due to lack of evidence or because of a failure to meet the requirements for tribal jurisdiction.

    “In others, charges were filed but subsequently dismissed due to lack of evidence or because of a failure to meet the requirements for tribal jurisdiction.274”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites NAT'L CONG.OF AM.INDIANS, supra note 30

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Findingreasoning

    Tribal sentiment as it pertains to restorative justice seems to be stronger than what is realized in practice.

    “Tribal sentiment as it pertains to restorative justice seems to be stronger than what is realized in practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The tribes that have adopted TLOA and VAWA appear to be working under a fairly standard adversarial system, and probation and incarceration appear to be modeled on the federal and state systems.

    “the tribes that have adopted the two statutes appear to be working under a fairly standard adversarial system, and probation and incarceration appear to be modeled on the federal and state systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    Tribes contemplating VAWA report that a lack of resources is the primary reason they have not implemented the laws.

    “Tribes contemplating VAWA report that a lack of resources is the primary reason they have not implemented the laws.336”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [336]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Another leader at a recent meeting of tribal and federal leaders discussing the impacts of TLOA noted that 80 percent of those incarcerated are substance abuse offenders, and that this is the trend throughout Indian country.

    “leader at a recent meeting of tribal and federal leaders discussing the impacts of TLOA similarly noted that 80 percent of those incarcerated are substance abuse offenders, and that this is the trend throughout Indian country.327”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [327]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    TLOA has not improved criminal justice on the Cheyenne River Sioux reservation because it cannot be implemented for lack of funding.

    “The Tribal Chairman of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe recently reiterated the point that TLOA has not improved criminal justice on that reservation, because it cannot be implemented for lack of funding.335”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [335]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    In the Commission's field hearings, leaders repeatedly expressed skepticism of incarceration where other options are available.

    “In the Commission's field hearings, leaders repeatedly expressed their skepticism of incarceration where other options are available.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [307]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Despite the fact that tribal police officers are peace officers and have the authority to detain an offender and transport him to the proper authorities, there is confusion among tribal police officers as to the scope of this power.

    “Despite the fact that tribal police officers are peace officers and have the authority to detain an offender and “transport him to the proper authorities,” 343 there is confusion among tribal police officers as to the scope of this power.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [343]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    One of the first domestic violence offenders to take advantage of a tribe's offender treatment program was a non-Indian.

    “In fact, one of the first domestic violence offenders to take advantage of a tribe's offender treatment program was a non-Indian.318”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [318]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Some senators that opposed VAWA have boldly expressed confidence that once the law is challenged in federal court, it will not withstand constitutional scrutiny.

    “Some senators that opposed VAWA have boldly expressed confidence, for example, that once the law is challenged in federal court, it will not withstand constitutional scrutiny.340”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [340]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    One tribal Chairman stated that 97 percent of all calls to police are for either domestic violence or drunk driving.

    “In addressing the need for alternatives to incarceration and treatment, one tribal Chairman stated that 97 percent of all calls to police are for either domestic violence or drunk driving.326”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [326]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Though anecdotal, there is a sense that tribes would readily employ more alternatives to the adversary model if they were funded, but many federal grants or programs are linked directly to existing carceral systems.

    “Though anecdotal, there is a sense that tribes would readily employ more alternatives to the adversary model if they were funded, but many federal grants or programs are linked directly to existing carceral systems.329”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [329]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Tribes want to employ more traditional remedies, which might even alleviate the need for some of the costs associated with adversarial systems and incarceration, but it is very difficult to get funding for them.

    “Tribes want to employ more traditional remedies-which might even alleviate the need for some of the costs associated with adversarial systems and incarceration-but it is very difficult to get funding for them.313”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [313]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The National Congress of American Indians has requested from DOI that the scope of arrest authority of tribal police officers be definitively clarified, but that has yet to happen.

    “The National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) has requested from DOI that the scope of arrest authority of tribal police officers be definitively clarified, but that has yet to happen.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The relevant time frame for VAWA prosecutions studied is March 7, 2013 to March 6, 2015, during which there were twenty-eight VAWA cases involving twenty-four offenders.

    “Thus, the relevant time frame for VAWA prosecutions studied herein is from March 7, 2013 until March 6, 2015, during which time there were twenty-eight VAWA cases involving twenty-four offenders.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    By the end of the relevant period, only three of the five pilot project tribes had initiated prosecutions under VAWA; only approximately nine tribes in the United States had become TLOA compliant.

    “By the end of the relevant period, only three of the five pilot project tribes had initiated prosecutions under VAWA; only approximately nine tribes in the United States had become TLOA compliant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes and Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate were designated as pilot project tribes only one day before the conclusion of the pilot project and had no opportunity to file any cases under VAWA.

    “Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes in Montana and Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate in South Dakota were designated as pilot project tribes only one day before the conclusion of the pilot project, and, therefore, had no opportunity to file any cases under VAWA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Recently, a non-Indian violated a protection order on a reservation in California; the tribal police arrested the offender and the tribal police were subsequently prosecuted for restraining and detaining the non-Indian violator, and the prosecution still has not been dropped.

    “Recently, a non-Indian violated a protection order on a reservation in California.The tribal police arrested the offender and the tribal police were subsequently prosecuted for restraining and detaining the non-Indian violator.The prosecution still has not been dropped.347”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [347]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) became TLOA compliant in 2011 and handed down the first extended sentence under TLOA in November 2012.

    “It is clear that the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) became TLOA compliant in 2011 and handed down the first extended sentence under TLOA in November 2012.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In that case, the tribe could prosecute the non-Indian perpetrator for the crime against the Indian woman but could not prosecute for the crime of child abuse.

    “Although the tribe could prosecute the non-Indian perpetrator for the crime against the Indian woman, it could not prosecute for the crime of child abuse.356”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites NAT'L CONG. OF AM. INDIANS, supra note 30, at 26

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both TLOA and VAWA seek to restore a modicum of tribal sovereignty over criminal justice matters in Indian country.

    “Both statutes seek to restore a modicum of tribal sovereignty over criminal justice matters in Indian country.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tribes are subject to the plenary authority of Congress, which has largely upheld federal efforts to set the scope of tribal sovereignty in matters of criminal jurisdiction.

    “Nevertheless, tribes are subject to the plenary authority of Congress, which has largely upheld federal efforts to set the scope of tribal sovereignty in matters of criminal jurisdiction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Testimony before Congress revealed inadequate punishments, failures to prosecute, paltry resources for safety and policing, and violence by criminals who seek reservations where they believe they are insulated from prosecution.

    “Just in the past few years, testimony given before Congress has revealed countless incidences of inadequate punishments, failures to prosecute, paltry resources for safety and policing, as well as brazen acts of violence by savvy criminals actively seeking to commit crimes on reservations where they believe they are insulated from prosecution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites 2008 Hearing

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Laird, supra note 31

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The 1885 Major Crimes Act was expressly intended to break up traditional tribal justice systems and further the assimilation of Indians into White society.

    “In a move expressly intended to break up traditional tribal justice systems and further the assimilation of Indians into White society, Congress passed the 1885 Major Crimes Act.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Congress amended ICRA in 1986 to expand tribes' sentencing authority from six months to one year per count and a $5000 monetary fine, but still did not authorize felony sentencing.

    “Congress amended ICRA in 1986 to expand tribes' sentencing authority from six months to one year per count and a $5000 monetary fine, but still did not authorize felony sentencing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The parameters of tribal criminal jurisdiction in the United States have been set largely by the U.S. Supreme Court, though congressional acts have clarified and shaped it.

    “The parameters of tribal criminal jurisdiction in the United States, by contrast, have been set largely by the U.S. Supreme Court, though congressional acts certainly have clarified and shaped it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Indian country criminal justice is a story of piecemeal interventions-both by Congress and the Supreme Court-that have created the maze within which reservation Indians find themselves today, with devastating consequences.

    “What this history demonstrates is that Indian country criminal justice is a story of piecemeal interventions-both by Congress and the Supreme Court-that have created the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Long before the Constitution was drafted and ratified, Indian nations had inherent sovereignty over their people and territories and governed according to their own laws.

    “Long before the Constitution was drafted and ratified, Indian nations had inherent sovereignty over their people and territories and governed according to their own laws.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The current system of criminal justice in Indian country is untenable.

    “Practically speaking, the current system of criminal justice in Indian country is untenable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Criminal jurisdiction in Indian country is defined by a central, ironic paradox.

    “Criminal jurisdiction in Indian country is defined by a central, ironic paradox.”
    • Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
      “But criminal jurisdiction in Indian country is defined by a central, ironic paradox.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The remaining gaps in criminal jurisdiction left exclusively under the authority of the federal government have never been adequately filled.

    “And the remaining gaps in criminal jurisdiction left exclusively under the authority of the federal government have never been adequately filled.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    At the same time that tribal sovereignty gains ground, it is simultaneously threatened by exogenous forces that have the potential to homogenize tribal justice systems legally, politically, and culturally.

    “As a result, at the same time that tribal sovereignty gains ground in ways critical to autonomy and self-governance, it is simultaneously threatened by exogenous forces that have the potential to homogenize tribal justice systems legally, politically, and-in particular-culturally.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    To assert special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction, a tribe must revise its codes to allow for a cross-section of the community to serve on juries, and must not specifically exclude any group of people, including non-Indians.

    “To assert special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction (SDVCJ), the tribe must revise its codes to allow for a cross-section of the community to serve on juries, and the tribe must not specifically exclude any group of people (including non-Indians).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites VAWA

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    If tribes fully transform tribal institutions rooted in distinct tribal custom and Indian culture, the process of colonization will be complete.

    “At the same time, if tribes fully transform tribal institutions, rooted in distinct tribal custom and Indian culture, the process of colonization will be complete.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    After decades of deteriorating public safety and decreased faith in tribal and federal justice systems, TLOA and VAWA signal a remarkable directional shift in favor of tribal sovereignty.

    “After decades of deteriorating public safety and decreased faith in tribal and federal justice systems, the two statutes signal a remarkable directional shift in favor of tribal sovereignty.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The ILOC's work resulted in the publication of Roadmap to Justice, the most comprehensive report on Indian country criminal justice ever produced.

    “The ILOC's work resulted in the publication of Roadmap to Justice, the most comprehensive report on Indian country criminal justice ever produced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites INDIAN LAW AND ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    VAWA guarantees the rights of tribes to impose traditional punishments in tribal court proceedings and allows tribes to seek federal funding to support such programs.

    “VAWA guarantees the rights of tribes to impose traditional punishments in tribal court proceedings and allows tribes to seek federal funding to support such programs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites VAWA

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Of the three hundred plus tribal governments in the lower forty-eight states, 52 percent are located in Public Law 280 states, which was cut out of federal funding for institution-building and development; thus, they tend to be ill-suited currently to adopt TLOA or VAWA.

    “Of the three hundred plus tribal governments in the lower forty-eight states, 52 percent are located in Public Law 280 states, which was cut out of federal funding that went to tribes for institutionbuilding and development; thus, they tend to be ill-suited currently to adopt TLOA or VAWA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goldberg & Champagne, Fit for the Twenty-First Century, supra note 24

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Congress reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act in 2013 with tribal provisions, providing the partial Oliphant fix advocates had sought.

    “In the face of these startling facts, Congress reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act in 2013 with tribal provisions, providing the partial Oliphant fix advocates had sought.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Violence Against Women Act

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tribes implementing TLOA can stack sentences for crimes, with a maximum term of nine years in prison.

    “The tribes implementing TLOA can also stack sentences for crimes, with a maximum term of nine years in prison.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 25 U.S.C. § 1302(a)(7)(D) (2012)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    TLOA and VAWA stand as enormous victories for Indian country.

    “By most accounts, TLOA and VAWA stand as enormous victories for Indian country.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Roadmap's ultimate recommendation, the Grand Bargain, advocates first and foremost for tribally led solutions to end the epidemic of crime in Indian country.

    “Roadmap's ultimate recommendation-the Grand Bargain-advocates, first and foremost, for tribally led solutions to end the epidemic of crime in Indian country.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By imposing new standards on tribes that closely align with the federal constitution, TLOA and VAWA draw tribes closer to an American model of criminal justice and potentially further away from distinct tribal practices rooted in Indian difference.

    “By imposing new standards on tribes-standards which closely align with those of the federal constitution, to which the tribes are not otherwise bound 153 -the laws draw tribes ever closer to an American model of criminal justice and, concomitantly, potentially further away from distinct, tribal practices that are rooted in Indian difference.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Without basic public safety, communities deteriorate: students cannot focus on learning, and tribes and individual tribal members cannot engage in economic development, attract business, or grow tourism.

    “Without basic public safety, communities deteriorate: Students cannot focus on learning; tribes and individual tribal members cannot engage in economic development, attract business, or grow tourism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 3 TRIBAL LAW AND ORDER ACT OF 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The importance of TLOA was to soften sentencing restrictions and allow tribes to address some of the disparities that occur when the federal government fails to prosecute.

    “The importance of TLOA was to soften sentencing restrictions and allow tribes to address some of the disparities that occur when the federal government fails to prosecute.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Indian tribes may only be able to guarantee their sovereign rights to exercise criminal jurisdiction if they do so on the terms of the very government that has sought to dismantle tribal justice systems.

    “This raises the concern that Indian tribes may only be able to guarantee their sovereign rights to exercise criminal jurisdiction if they do so on the terms of the very government that has, for so long, sought to dismantle tribal justice systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Tribal members lose faith in tribal governments as well as in the federal system.

    “Tribal members lose faith in tribal governments as well as in the federal system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It may be that implementation was less jarring for the tribes that have already adopted the laws than others.

    “Of course, it may be that implementation was less jarring for the tribes that have already adopted the laws than others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    One possibility for an increase in reporting could be an increase in domestic violence cases generally, and the reported numbers may merely reflect that trend.

    “Of course, one possibility for an increase in reporting could be an increase in domestic violence cases generally, and the reported numbers may merely reflect that trend.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The expanded sovereignty from TLOA and VAWA comes at a price, and potentially assimilative mandates are at the heart of the bargain.

    “At the same time, that expanded sovereignty comes at a price-and potentially assimilative mandates are at the heart of the bargain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    The power to play a peacekeeping role within the community, which may include incarceration, is one of the key distinguishing features of a sovereign.

    “The power to play a peacekeeping role within the community, which may include incarceration, is one of the key distinguishing features of a sovereign.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The absence of jurisdiction was destroying the tribes' ability to govern and protect people, to engage in economic development, and to prosper.

    “The absence of jurisdiction was destroying the tribes' ability to govern and protect people, to engage in economic development, and to prosper.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The experience of the pilot project tribes provides critical guidance for Indian nations.

    “Thus, the experience of the pilot project tribes provides even more critical guidance for Indian nations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given the enormous spectrum of legal systems and cultural practices found across the more than 560 Indian nations in the United States, there is no universal answer to the question of how to balance potentially assimilative federal law with tribal culture and tradition.

    “Given the enormous spectrum of legal systems and cultural practices found across the more than 560 Indian nations in the United States, there is no universal answer to the question of how to balance potentially assimilative federal law with tribal culture and tradition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given the state of crime and governance in Indian country, amending codes and taking other steps necessary to exercise criminal authority goes to the legitimacy and capacity of tribes as governments.

    “Given the state of crime and governance in Indian country, amending codes and taking other steps necessary to exercise this authority goes to the legitimacy and capacity of tribes as governments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Tribes retain their inherent, sovereign authority that long predates the formation of the United States and the adoption of the United States Constitution.

    “Tribes retain their inherent, sovereign authority that long predates the formation of the United States and the adoption of the United States Constitution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    There is no standard profile of a tribe that may seek implementation of either TLOA or VAWA.

    “Thus, there is no standard profile of a tribe that may seek implementation of either statute.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This is particularly true where tribes have adopted traditional, indigenous-based forms of dispute resolution, such as the Navajo Peacemaker Court, where formal Western legal training may even be viewed as a detriment.

    “This is particularly true where tribes have adopted traditional, indigenous-based forms of dispute resolution, such as with the model set by the Navajo Peacemaker Court, where formal Western legal training may even be viewed as a detriment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If tribes are too quick to embrace these expansions without considering how they might impact tribal law, culture, and governance, this expansion in authority, in hindsight, might be seen as another instrument of assimilation to erode traditional tribal justice systems.

    “If tribes are too quick to embrace these expansions without considering how they might impact tribal law, culture, and governance, this expansion in authority, in hindsight, might be seen as another instrument of assimilation to erode traditional tribal justice systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is against this backdrop that debates around tribal criminal jurisdiction-both in terms of felony sentencing and jurisdiction over non-Indians-took place when the statutes were considered.

    “It is against this backdrop that debates around tribal criminal jurisdictionboth in terms of felony sentencing and jurisdiction over non-Indians-took place when the statutes were considered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A move towards adoption of both TLOA and VAWA, where politically and fiscally feasible, provides an opportunity for tribal governments to exercise, enhance, and enrich tribal sovereignty, and such an exercise of sovereignty goes to the legitimacy and vitality of tribes as nations.

    “Building on the work of scholars and practitioners in the field, as well as accounts from tribal officials working in Indian country, this Article shows how a move towards adoption of both TLOA and VAWA, respectively, where politically and fiscally feasible, provides an opportunity for tribal governments to exercise, enhance, and enrich tribal sovereignty, and that such an exercise of sovereignty”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such knowledge has not always required formal law training from a tribal perspective, and may be inapposite to it.

    “Such knowledge has not always required formal law training from a tribal perspective, and, in fact, may be inapposite to it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Whatever concerns the pilot project tribes had regarding assimilation may have already been dealt with in earlier iterations of criminal justice decisions and discussions.

    “Whatever concerns they had regarding assimilation may have already been dealt with in earlier iterations of criminal justice decisions and discussions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    After more than a century of assimilative policies that sought to destroy tribal language, culture, and religion, Indian tribes today are in a period of revitalization and are wary of any further federal imposition onto internal tribal life, governance, and culture.

    “After more than a century of assimilative policies that sought to destroy tribal language, culture, and religion, Indian tribes today are in a period of revitalization and are, therefore, wary of any further federal imposition onto internal tribal life, governance, and culture.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A key factor in tribes' decisionmaking and in negotiating possible downsides-including risks of further assimilation-will be whether the laws are having a positive impact on the ground.

    “As tribes consider their options, a key factor in decisionmaking and in negotiating the possible downsides-including risks of further assimilation-will be whether the laws are having a positive impact on the ground.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    One safeguard for tribes is the flexibility built into the statutory standards, particularly in regards to both lawyers and judges.

    “One safeguard for tribes is the flexibility built into the statutory standards, particularly in regards to both lawyers and judges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    When ICRA was enacted in 1968, Congress maintained the status quo and did not extend to tribes the requirement of paid counsel for indigent defendants.

    “When ICRA was enacted in 1968, Congress maintained this status quo, and did not extend to tribes the requirement of paid counsel for indigent defendants.235”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 25 U.S.C. § 1302 (2012)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The CFR courts enforced federal Law and Order Codes, and a local Bureau of Indian Affairs officer conducted proceedings.

    “The CFR courts enforced federal Law and Order Codes, and a local Bureau of Indian Affairs officer conducted proceedings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fletcher, supra note 18

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Tribes know that providing effective counsel in tribal court is good for tribal sovereignty.

    “tribes know that providing effective counsel in tribal court is good for tribal sovereignty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Commission found that modifying the ICRA would not only provide more protection for criminal defendants, but would make it more consistent with existing operating procedures in tribal courts.

    “The Commission found that modifying the ICRA would not only provide more protection for criminal defendants, but would make it more consistent with existing operating procedures in tribal courts.245”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Beginning largely in the late nineteenth century, the federal government dismantled tribal justice systems and created Courts of Indian Offenses (CIO or CFR courts) in Indian country.

    “Beginning largely in the late nineteenth century, the federal government dismantled tribal justice systems and created Courts of Indian Offenses (known as CIO courts or CFR courts) in Indian country.231”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Creel, supra note 68

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The ILOC concluded that, without the right to counsel, the right to due process itself is compromised.

    “The Commission concluded that, “without the right to counsel, the right to due process itself is compromised.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Providing counsel in tribal court is merely a codification of the trend in tribal court practice in general.

    “In addition to the fact that providing counsel in tribal court is merely a codification of the trend in tribal court practice in general, 255 tribes know that providing effective counsel in tribal court is good for tribal sovereignty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Defense attorneys and tribal advocates have increasingly called for modifications to the laws to ensure protections for all defendants in tribal court.

    “Defense attorneys and tribal advocates have increasingly called for modifications to the laws to ensure protections for all defendants in tribal court.243”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Creel, supra note 68

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The federal government established an Indian police force and a system of tribal criminal justice that has never been tribal.

    “As Barbara Creel has written, it established an Indian police force and put into place a system of tribal “criminal justice” that has “never been ‘tribal.’”232”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Creel, supra note 68

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Whether Indian defendants are tribal members or not, they are indigenous and likely have ties within the community, often through family, friends, or extended religious or clan relations.

    “Whether Indian defendants are tribal members or not, they are indigenous: They likely have ties within the community, often through family, friends, or extended religious or clan relations.256”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CORNELL, CURTIS & JORGENSEN, supra note 109

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    By definition, for a defendant to be prosecuted under VAWA, he or she must have deep ties to the victim and the community.

    “By definition-as discussed in Part I-for a defendant to be prosecuted under VAWA, he or she must have deep ties to the victim and the community.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most CFR courts employed judges without legal training, allowed tribal prosecutors to serve dual roles as prosecutor and chief of police, and prohibited the presence of lawyers.

    “Most of the courts employed judges without legal training, allowed tribal prosecutors to serve dual roles as prosecutor and chief of police, and prohibited the presence of lawyers.234”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fletcher, supra note 18

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Despite the new extended sentencing authority, no additional resources were allocated to tribes to provide defense counsel, nor was there discussion of the potential constitutional issues uncounseled convictions might raise in the future.

    “Despite the new extended sentencing authority, no additional resources were allocated to tribes to provide defense counsel, nor was there discussion of the potential constitutional issues uncounseled convictions might raise in the future.242”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Creel, supra note 68

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Fletcher, supra note 18

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In Indian country, the case has come to stand for the proposition that non-Indians unquestionably can get a fair trial in tribal court.

    “At the same time, in Indian country, the case has come to stand for the proposition that non-Indians unquestionably can get a fair trial in tribal court.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Looking closely at what those working in Indian country criminal justice are saying, their statements explicate how and why prosecutorial authority and felony sentencing make Indian country safer, beyond their implementation in any one particular case.

    “But, looking closely at what those working in Indian country criminal justice are saying, their statements explicate how and why prosecutorial authority and felony sentencing make Indian country safer, beyond their implementation in any one particular case.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The story of criminal justice in Indian country is the opposite of the story of American criminal justice, which has been one of excessive policing, rabid criminalization, and long sentences.

    “But, as pointed out in this Article, the story of criminal justice in Indian country-as with many aspects of federal Indian law-is the opposite.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    To exploit or abuse non-Indians would signal that tribes are petty, corrupt, and incapable of functioning as legitimate governments.

    “To do so would be to signal that tribes are petty, corrupt, and incapable of functioning as legitimate governments.261”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites DEER, supra note 14

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Incarceration is not the only model tribes utilize to punish offenders, and it will be up to each tribe to ultimately determine which crimes, if any, should be subject to an alternative program.

    “Undoubtedly, incarceration is not the only model tribes utilize to punish offenders, and it will be up to each tribe to ultimately determine which crimes, if any, should be subject to an alternative program.282”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Laird, supra note 31

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites DEER, supra note 14

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Goldberg, supra note 33

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Without comparative data, there is only anecdotal evidence as to the impacts of TLOA and VAWA.

    “Again, without comparative data, there is only anecdotal evidence as to the impacts of TLOA and VAWA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The combination of very low probability of prosecution and very light sentences if convicted led to deterioration in both belief and participation in the justice system and, concomitantly, safety and security on the reservation.

    “This combination of factors-very low probability of prosecution and very light sentences if convicted-led to deterioration in both belief and participation in the justice system and, concomitantly, safety and security on the reservation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Where TLOA felony sentencing is utilized, it can make a significant difference in the sentence of the defendant and, quite possibly, in the lives of victims or potential victims, particularly if the defendant is a repeat offender.

    “Undoubtedly, where TLOA felony sentencing is utilized, it can make a significant difference in the sentence of the defendant and, quite possibly, in the lives of victims or potential victims, particularly if the defendant is a repeat offender.272”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Indian country suffers from gross neglect, characterized by a long history of federal law that attempted to make Indians literally and conceptually invisible, through policies of failed assimilation and geographic confinement.

    “Indian country suffers from gross neglect, characterized by a long history of federal law that attempted to make Indians literally and conceptually invisible, through policies of failed assimilation and geographic confinement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In a country where the criminal justice system has been characterized by overpolicing and harsh penalties, tribes have been left to fend for themselves, toiling on reservations with scant resources and strict sentencing limitations.

    “Thus, in a country where the criminal justice system has been characterized by overpolicing and harsh penalties, tribes have been left to fend for themselves, toiling on reservations with scant resources and strict sentencing limitations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Today, federal limitations are as much legal as geographical, as tribes have found themselves trapped in a maze of criminal justice where the federal government has failed to provide the concomitant protections required to satisfy its trust responsibility to Indian tribes.

    “Today, federal limitations are as much legal as geographical, as tribes have found themselves trapped in a “maze” 269 of criminal justice where the federal government has failed to provide the concomitant protections required to satisfy its trust responsibility to Indian tribes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 2008 Hearing, supra note 84

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When felonies occurred on the reservation, the absence of federal prosecution left many crimes unaddressed, feeding a sense of lawlessness and hopelessness.

    “First, when felonies occurred on the reservation, the absence of federal prosecution left many crimes unaddressed, feeding a sense of lawlessness and hopelessness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The analysis of recent exercises of tribal criminal authority leaves open the broader question whether enhanced sentencing has made Indian country safer.

    “The analysis of recent exercises of tribal criminal authority paints a familiar picture of probation and incarceration, but leaves open the broader question whether enhanced sentencing has made Indian country safer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The absence of some procedural protections, such as the right to counsel, may arguably be inadvertent holdovers from the incomplete imposition of a federal system that imparted adversarial procedures without corresponding safeguards, and that may now be ameliorated by the rise in the number of Native lawyers.

    “At the same time, the absence of some procedural protections, such as the right to counsel, may arguably be inadvertent holdovers from the incomplete imposition of a federal system that imparted adversarial procedures without corresponding safeguards, and that may now be ameliorated by the rise in the number of Native lawyers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Expanding tribal authority from one year to the three years authorized under TLOA does not put tribes on equal footing with states in most cases, but it does take a meaningful step towards leveling the playing field, at least in regards to sentencing.

    “Tribal leaders pointed out that, although expanding tribal authority from one year to the three years authorized under TLOA does not put tribes on equal footing with states in most cases, it does take a meaningful step towards leveling the playing field, at least in regards to sentencing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites FOLSOM-SMITH, supra note 83

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Those working in Indian country criminal justice repeatedly assert that the complete absence of accountability-a system where perpetrators know the probability of prosecution is incredibly low-actually encourages more crime by offenders, who know they will not be held accountable for their actions.

    “Those working in Indian country criminal justice repeatedly assert that the complete absence of accountability-a system where perpetrators know the probability of prosecution is incredibly low-actually encourages more crime by offenders, who know they will not be held accountable for their actions.283”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 2008 Hearing, supra note 84

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This is entirely against larger tribal objectives of greater self-determination, jurisdiction, and respect.

    “This is entirely against larger tribal objectives of greater selfdetermination, jurisdiction, and respect. 262”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CORNELL, CURTIS & JORGENSEN, supra note 109

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    This shifted prosecutorial authority to tribes, who were only able to impose sentences of one year per count, even for major crimes like rape and murder.

    “This shifted prosecutorial authority to tribes, who were only able to impose sentences of one year per count, even for major crimes like rape and murder.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Sovereignty over people and territory is essential to a functioning government.

    “Sovereignty over people and territory is essential to a functioning government.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Led by scholars like Kevin Washburn, experts on the ground with experience with criminal justice systems have argued for decades for a return to tribally led solutions to crime control.

    “Led by scholars like Kevin Washburn, experts on the ground with experience with criminal justice systems have argued for decades for a return to tribally led solutions to crime control.290”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Eid & Doyle, Separate but Unequal

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Washburn, supra note 25

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The federal government has proven that it simply cannot or will not provide the resources and expertise necessary to keep reservations safe.

    “The federal government has proven that it simply cannot or will not provide the resources and expertise necessary to keep reservations safe.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [297]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The fulfillment of the prerogative of tribes as sovereigns points to other important conceptual reasons why criminal justice authority for tribes is both desired and desirable.

    “The fulfillment of the prerogative of tribes as sovereigns further points to other important conceptual reasons why criminal justice authority for tribes is both desired and desirable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Tribes perhaps are not exploring restorative justice options to the fullest extent possible.

    “but perhaps are not exploring these to the fullest extent possible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The cavalry effect is observed when tribal communities are largely left alone, isolated, with very little guarantee of safety, security, or justice; then when the federal government comes to investigate a crime, it descends on a reservation community to which it has no political, cultural, or social relationship.

    “As Washburn refers to it, the “cavalry effect” is observed when tribal communities are largely left alone, isolated, with very little guarantee of safety, security, or justice.300 Then, when the federal government does come in to investigate a crime, it does so by descending on a reservation community to which it has no political, cultural, or social relationship.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [300]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisereasoning

    The ability of tribes to arrest, prosecute, and, where necessary, punish offenders within Indian country goes to a core governmental duty.

    “The ability of tribes to arrest, prosecute, and, where necessary, punish offenders within Indian country goes to a core governmental duty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Indian tribes are the original progenitors of local, traditional and restorative justice practices, and the evidence shows tribes are eager to return to that model, at least in certain instances.

    “In many ways, Indian tribes are the original progenitors of local, traditional and restorative justice practices, and the evidence shows tribes are eager to return to that model, at least in certain instances.291”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ex parte Crow Dog

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Estate of Tasunke Witko v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Indian nations are governments, act as governments, and want to be treated like governments.

    “Indian nations are governments, act as governments, and want to be treated like governments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A history of racism, abuse, and mistrust works against active participation in the criminal justice system by Indians, who often are wary of outsiders, suspicious of federal authorities, and burdened by poverty and unemployment.

    “A history of racism, abuse, and mistrust work against active participation in the criminal justice system by Indians, who often are wary of outsiders, suspicious of federal authorities they do not know, and additionally burdened by poverty and unemployment.299”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [299]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A return to local control in public safety may also be especially useful to facilitate the use of alternatives to incarceration and encourage tribes to experiment with new criminal justice models.

    “And, particularly relevant to this Article, a return to local control in public safety may also be especially useful to facilitate the use of alternatives to incarceration and encourage tribes to take advantage of the opportunity to experiment with new criminal justice models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both Indian country criminal justice and the larger national conversation increasingly emphasize local control and responsibility, less federal intrusion, and more emphasis on alternatives to incarceration.

    “Both increasingly emphasize: local control and responsibility, less federal intrusion, and more emphasis on alternatives to incarceration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    They are only a first-and for far too many tribes, an infeasible-step towards true Indian country criminal justice reform.

    “Undoubtedly, they are only a first-and for far too many tribes, an infeasible-step towards true Indian country criminal justice reform.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the VAWA cases at Pascua Yaqui, alternatives to incarceration may be particularly inappropriate given that the defendants were non-Indian, had no active engagement in Yaqui cultural life, and were repeat offenders.

    “Although, as with the VAWA cases at Pascua Yaqui, in particular, given that the defendants were non-Indian, had no active engagement in Yaqui cultural life, and were repeat offenders, alternatives to incarceration may be particularly inappropriate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Extensive research shows that encouraging tribes to experiment with punishments that deviate from the state and federal norm is consistent with tribes' own preferences in both procedure and punishment.

    “First, I assert that extensive research shows that doing so is consistent with tribes' own preferences in both the realm of procedure, as well as with regard to questions of punishment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Discussions about tribal criminal jurisdiction are peaking at the same time that the national conversation regarding the failed American criminal justice system has become cacophonous.

    “Coincidentally, discussions about tribal criminal jurisdiction are peaking at the same time that the national conversation regarding the failed American criminal justice system has become cacophonous.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The argument that law enforcement in general is more effective when focused locally with significant community engagement is gaining ground in the United States.

    “The argument that law enforcement in general is more effective when focused locally with significant community engagement is gaining ground in the United States.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [302]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is a timely synergy between Indian country criminal justice and the larger national conversation about criminal justice reform.

    “In this sense, there is a timely synergy between Indian country criminal justice and the larger national conversation about criminal justice reform.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Criminal justice in Indian country is a national disgrace.

    “The result, as the federal government itself concedes, is that criminal justice in Indian country is a “national disgrace.”288”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 2008 Hearing, supra note 84

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As a result, victims stop reporting crimes, refuse to participate in the criminal justice system, and opt out of community policing or local control altogether.

    “As a result, victims stop reporting crimes, refuse to participate in the criminal justice system, and opt out of community policing or local control altogether.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Tribes are in a unique position to experience both ascension in sovereignty and a corresponding resistance to assimilation if they tread cautiously.

    “In other words, tribes are in a unique position to experience both ascension in sovereignty and a corresponding resistance to assimilation if they tread cautiously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This means that more perpetrators commit repeat offenses that are never reported, thus starting the cycle over again.

    “This, in turn, means that more perpetrators commit repeat offenses that are never reported, thus starting the cycle over again.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Empowering tribes to go blindly down the American criminal justice road without careful consideration is unlikely to lead to desirable results.

    “Thus, empowering tribes to go blindly down this road without careful consideration is unlikely to lead to desirable results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The current American model of criminal justice responds to crime by ratcheting up sentences without corresponding treatments, services, and re-entry, creating an endless cycle that only leads to defeat.

    “the current model of American criminal justice, in which the response to crime is to continue to ratchet up sentences without thinking about corresponding treatments, services, and re-entry, is an endless cycle that only leads to defeat.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The expansions represented by TLOA and VAWA are viewed in tribes as providing an opportunity to break the cycle of violence and hopelessness in Indian country.

    “The expansions represented by TLOA and VAWA, respectively, are viewed in tribes as providing an opportunity to break the cycle of violence and hopelessness in Indian country.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Current available evidence demonstrates that tribes do, in fact, want expanded jurisdiction and authority because it suits the sovereign's prerogative theoretically as well as practically.

    “Accordingly, current available evidence demonstrates that tribes do, in fact, want expanded jurisdiction and authority because it suits the sovereign's prerogative theoretically as well as practically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The deprivation of this right for tribes has been disastrous because of what it signals regarding the federal government's view of tribal sovereignty, and demoralizing for Indian people and Indian communities because the federal government has not picked up the mantle to fill the gaps.

    “The deprivation of this right for tribes has not only been disastrous because of what it signals regarding the federal government's view of tribal sovereignty, it has been demoralizing for Indian people and Indian communities because the federal government has not picked up the mantle to fill the gaps.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Tribal members assert that, even when they report crimes, and those crimes are prosecuted, they are devastated by a system that can only give one year per count for even the most heinous of crimes.

    “Correspondingly, tribal members assert that, even when they report crimes, and those crimes are prosecuted, they are devastated by a system that can only give one year per count for even the most heinous of crimes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Criminal justice authority bolsters both internal and external legitimacy and respect, in addition to providing further support for the doctrinal features discussed previously.

    “Criminal justice authority bolsters both internal and external legitimacy and respect, in addition to providing further support for the doctrinal features discussed previously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    As a report from the Indigenous Peoples Law and Policy Program at Michigan State University pointed out, because the programs are unfunded, the tribes that need them the most will not receive them.

    “As a report from the Indigenous Peoples Law and Policy Program at Michigan State University pointed out, because the programs are unfunded, the tribes that need them the most will not receive them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [333]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The Commission concluded that the most important takeaway regarding punishment was to seek alternatives to incarceration when possible, finding that they should be the paramount objective in any plan to address the corrections aspect of public safety in Tribal nations.

    “It concluded that the most important takeaway regarding punishment was to seek alternatives to incarceration when possible, finding that they “should 1564 (2016)be the paramount objective in any plan to address the corrections aspect of public safety in Tribal nations.”311”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [311]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tribal leaders have in the past opposed the idea of jury trials, the encouragement of defendants not to speak as to their own guilt or innocence, and an impartial judge with no knowledge of the case.

    “Tribal leaders have in the past opposed the idea of jury trials, the encouragement of defendants not to speak as to their own guilt or innocence, and an impartial judge with no knowledge of the case, among others.320”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [320]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Commission noted that many Indian offenders are suffering the effects of poverty, isolation and substance abuse and that detention of Tribal members should be a rare exception in the corrections context.

    “The Commission noted, as did many of the speakers and participants, that many Indian offenders “are suffering the effects of poverty, isolation and substance abuse” and that “[d]etention of Tribal members should be a rare exception in the corrections context.”312”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [312]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    High rates of alcohol consumption are linked to the experience of colonialism, which has produced a great deal of the misery and crime in Indian country.

    “High rates of alcohol consumption are linked to the experience of colonialism, which has produced a great deal of the “misery and crime in Indian country.””
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The most salient critique of the tribe-centered model advocated through TLOA and VAWA is that it lets the federal government off the hook too easily.

    “The most salient critique of the tribe-centered model that has been advocated through TLOA and VAWA is that it lets the federal government off the hook too easily.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The American Indian reservations with the worst crime problem are the same reservations that do not have the structural capacity to implement TLOA.

    “As the report states, “The terrible irony of TLOA is that the American Indian reservations with the worst crime problem are the same reservations that do not have the structural capacity to implement the Act.”333”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [333]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is not acceptable or feasible to think that newly enacted federal laws can successfully hand off the burden of criminal justice to Indian tribes, particularly when the systems are wholly unfunded.

    “It is not acceptable or feasible to think that newly enacted federal laws can successfully hand off the burden of criminal justice to Indian tribes, particularly when the systems are wholly unfunded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Drug and alcohol abuse has been notoriously high in Indian country historically, and it has been on the rise in recent years.

    “Drug and alcohol abuse has been notoriously high in Indian country historically, and it has been on the rise in recent years.325”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [325]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Numerous provisions of the statutes are vague, and there are likely to be legal challenges on many fronts.

    “Numerous provisions of the statutes are vague, and there are likely to be legal challenges on many fronts.339”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [339]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Integrating tribal practices into criminal justice systems is not limited to the punishment phase of the proceedings; traditional methods of adjudicating claims also influence process.

    “And integrating tribal practices into criminal justice systems is not limited to the punishment phase of the proceedings.In fact, traditional methods of adjudicating claims also influence process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cooperation among sovereigns is key to success and could be further encouraged and provided for through better training, funding, and federal oversight.

    “Cooperation among sovereigns is key to success and could be further encouraged and provided for through better training, funding, and federal oversight.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    An additional cost that is almost certain to arise in some form is through litigation.

    “An additional cost that is almost certain to arise in some form is through litigation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    These problems are unique in the way they play out in Indian country, but they are not unique to American Indian communities.

    “These problems, of course, are unique in the way they play out in Indian country, but they are not unique to American Indian communities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Violent felonies, including rape, sexual assault, child molestation, and domestic violence, are particularly cases best handled in an adversarial process where incarceration may be appropriate.

    “This is particularly true of violent felonies, including rape, sexual assault, child molestation, and domestic violence.321”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [321]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Procuring funding for programs that focus on juveniles would also serve at least to begin to break the cycle of substance abuse and the suicide crisis seen in reservation communities.

    “Procuring funding for programs that focus on juveniles would also serve at least to begin to break the cycle of substance abuse and the suicide crisis seen in reservation communities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    From all of this comes feelings of hopelessness, frustration, helplessness, and despair, all of which fuel drug and alcohol abuse and contribute to feelings of anger and, ultimately, violent behavior.

    “From all of this comes feelings of hopelessness, frustration, helplessness, and despair-all of which fuel drug and alcohol abuse and contribute to feelings of anger and, ultimately, violent behavior.328”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [328]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If the federal government were doing its part to protect Indian people, the kinds of laws that tribes have advocated for may not be necessary.

    “If the federal government were doing its part to protect Indian people, the kinds of laws that tribes have advocated for may not be necessary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The ILOC found that such approaches have worked well for decades, if not centuries, and hold tremendous promise for adjudicating more disputes at less cost and for determining sentences where, based on community norms and mores, the punishment fits the crime.

    “As the ILOC found, “[s]uch approaches have worked well for decades, if not centuries, and hold tremendous promise for adjudicating more disputes at less cost and for determining sentences where, based on community norms and mores, the punishment fits the crime.”317”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [317]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If VAWA is struck down, tribes will have to confront the possibility of putting a great deal of resources into a plan that may only be struck down by the Supreme Court in the next decade.

    “If that is the case, tribes will have to confront the possibility of putting a great deal of resources into a plan that may only be struck down by the Supreme Court in the next decade.341”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [341]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There are similar reports that Nevada tribes have been questioned about their authority to arrest non-member Indians, an issue that already came before the Supreme Court and was definitively decided in United States v. Lara, upholding tribes' inherent authority to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all Indians within its territory, regardless of membership status.

    “There are similar reports that Nevada tribes have been questioned about their authority to arrest non-member Indians, an issue that already came before the Supreme Court and was definitively decided in United States v. Lara, 349 upholding tribes' inherent authority to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all Indians within its territory, regardless of membership status.350”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [349]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [350]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Indian country is moving in the opposite direction from the national dialogue about reducing sentences and taking a different approach to policing.

    “Ironically, in light of a national dialogue about reducing sentences and taking a different approach to policing, Indian country is moving in the opposite direction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Hundreds of tribes across the United States stand on the precipice of making critical choices about whether they will opt into the enhanced sentencing of TLOA, the expanded jurisdictional reach of VAWA, both, or neither, as well as how they will operationalize these changes.

    “Today, hundreds of tribes across the United States stand on the precipice of making critical choices about whether they will opt into the enhanced sentencing of TLOA, the expanded jurisdictional reach of VAWA, both, or neither, as well as how they will operationalize these changes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Failing to intervene means that abusers increase and escalate their attacks, which is quite common, particularly in domestic violence situations.

    “Thus, failing to intervene means that abusers increase and escalate their attacks, which is quite common, particularly in domestic violence situations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [346]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    There is no granular data on TLOA prosecutions, and tribes have neither identified nor catalogued TLOA cases.

    “There is no granular data on TLOA prosecutions, and the tribes have neither identified nor catalogued the TLOA cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The answers to these questions will impact fiscal and human resource allocation, law reform, institution building, and tribes' own exercise of sovereign authority that will touch the day-to-day lives of tribal members and those who come in contact with them.

    “The answers to these questions will impact fiscal and human resource allocation, law reform, institution building, and tribes' own exercise of sovereign authority that will touch the day-to-day lives of tribal members and those who come in contact with them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    As an attorney for the tribe argued, this state of affairs leaves tribal police officers impotent and fearful of doing their jobs when they are at risk of prosecution.

    “As an attorney for the tribe argued, this state of affairs leaves tribal police officers impotent and fearful of doing their jobs when they are at risk of prosecution.348”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [348]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    As Former Associate Attorney General Tom Perrelli testified before the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs prior to reauthorization of VAWA, tribal police are in an incredibly difficult position.

    “But, as Former Associate Attorney General Tom Perrelli testified before the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs prior to reauthorization of VAWA, tribal police are in an incredibly difficult position.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [346]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The current system creates perverse incentives and encourages tribal police to ignore scenarios where they cannot confirm the race or membership of the perpetrator or assess the relationship between perpetrator and victim.

    “The current system creates perverse incentives, and actually encourages tribal police to ignore scenarios in which they cannot confirm either the race or membership of the perpetrator or where they cannot assess in a potentially violent and dangerous scenario what the terms of the relationship are between the perpetrator and the victim(s).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Leaving arrest authority open disincentivizes individuals from becoming tribal police officers and creates a culture where tribal police are reluctant to respond to protect victims, even in exigent circumstances.

    “First, it disincentivizes individuals from becoming tribal police officers and creates a culture where tribal police are reluctant to respond to protect victims, even in exigent circumstances.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Perrelli refers to the beliefs of tribal police as mistaken, but the reality is that tribal officers' fears are not wholly unfounded.

    “Perrelli refers to the beliefs of tribal police as “mistaken,” but the reality is that tribal officers' fears are not wholly unfounded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The analysis relies almost entirely on secondary sources.

    “So the analysis relies almost entirely on secondary sources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
195 of 195
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Federal officials rarely live in Indian country and are seldom members of the reservation community.

    “Federal officials rarely live in Indian country and are seldom members of the reservation community.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Protection of the people from crime is one of the core functions of government.

    “Protection of the people from crime is one of the core functions of government.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Without safety, individuals cannot flourish, seek education or pursue other life goals.

    “Without safety, individuals cannot flourish, seek education or pursue other life goals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The power to play a peacekeeping role within the community, which may include incarceration, is one of the key distinguishing features of a sovereign.

    “The power to play a peacekeeping role within the community, which may include incarceration, is one of the key distinguishing features of a sovereign.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A central function of government is to keep citizens safe and to provide conditions sufficient for peace and prosperity.

    “At the same time, a central function of government is to keep citizens safe and to provide conditions sufficient for peace and prosperity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The pilot project tribes' experiences are indicative of the broader impact of VAWA and TLOA despite the small sample size.

    “However, even given the very small sample size available in this analysis, some preliminary evidence begins to paint at least a partial picture as to the impact that the statutes are having on the ground.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Poor communities of color bear the greatest burden of the failed American criminal justice system.

    “Poor communities of color bear the greatest burden of this failed system.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Despite federal efforts at assimilation and intervention, tribes historically have employed alternative sentencing mechanisms when possible.

    “Despite federal efforts at assimilation and intervention, tribes historically have employed alternative sentencing mechanisms when possible.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many American Indians in the criminal justice system, like many others in the state and federal systems, are there because of addiction.

    “Many American Indians in the criminal justice system, like many others in the state and federal systems, are there because of addiction.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Though communities vary, drug and alcohol addiction, and alcohol in particular, drives crime on the reservation.

    “Though communities obviously vary, there is a general sense that drug and alcohol addiction-and alcohol, in particular-drives crime on the reservation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Bridge funding and pilot projects for federally funded imprisonment are finite and not guaranteed.

    “There has been bridge funding and pilot projects for federally funded imprisonment, but they are finite and not guaranteed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The situation of criminal justice in Indian country is the result of decades of federal policy that has failed Native people.

    “of criminal justice in Indian country is the result of decades of federal policy that has failed Native people.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The federal government is simply not available to cover the duties of local policing.

    “The federal government is simply not available to cover the duties of local policing.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are enormous costs to implementation of TLOA and VAWA in some cases.

    “Though there are, in some cases, enormous costs to implementation of the two laws, ultimately each tribe will have to make decisions about how to move forward.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The federal government has abandoned Indian reservations in terms of providing basic policing services.

    “Given all the ways in which the federal government has abandoned Indian reservations in terms of providing basic policing services, it is untenable that tribal police are sent on patrol without clear authority to arrest and detain without fear of prosecution themselves.”
15 of 15

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. See S. James Anaya, Indian Givers: What Indigenous Peoples Have Contributed to International Human Rights Law, 22 WASH. U. J.L. & POL'Y 107, 108 (2006) (describing the colonial vestiges of Western law and its impact on indigenous peoples). 269. See Clinton, Jurisdictional Maze, supra note 8. 270.
  2. See M. Brent Leonhard & Cisco Minthorn, A Comparison of State Low Level Felony Sentencing Authority, in Tribal Courts and the Administration of Justice in Indian Country: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on Indian Affairs, 110th Cong. 102-06 (2008) (examining how states have defined their lowest level felony to determine the appropriate maximum sentencing for tribes). 292. See, e.g., Robert N. Clinton, Redressing the Legacy of Conquest: A Vision Quest for a Decolonized Federal Indian Law, 46 ARK. L. REV. 77, 121 (1993);
  3. U.S. DEP'T OF JUSTICE & U.S. DEP'T OF INTERIOR, TRIBAL LAW AND ORDER ACT: LONG TERM PLAN TO BUILD AND ENHANCE TRIBAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS 10 (2011), https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/ files/tribal/legacy/2014/02/06/tloa-tsp-aug2011.pdf [https://perma.cc/7ZKS-SVRA]). 312. Id. 313. See Creel, supra note 68, at 357. 314. INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9, at 133. 315. Id. 316. Id. 317. Id. 343. Duro v. Reina, 495 U.S. 676, 697 (1990). 344. See Letter From Jefferson Keel, President, Nat'l Cong. of Am. Indians, to Kevin Washburn, Assistant Sec'y for Indian Affairs, U.S. Dep't of Interior, and Hilary Tompkins, Solicitor, U.S. Dep't of Interior 1 (July 24, 2013), http://www.tribal-institute.org/download/VAWA/ NCAI%20Washburn-Tompkins%20letter_%20arrest%20authority_071013.pdf [https://perma. cc/S4Q8-YX8G] (requesting clarification on authority of tribal law enforcement to detain and arrest non-Indians). 345. See 160 CONG. REC. 26, S942 (Feb. 12, 2014). 346.
  4. see also TRIBAL LAW & POLICY INST., supra note 140, at 31-34 (discussing the types of defendants subject to Indian jurisdiction under VAWA). 354. See Tulalip Tribes, Press Release, VAWA 2013 and the Tulalip Tribes Jurisdiction Over Crimes of Domestic Violence, TULALIP TRIBES (Oct. 5, 2015), http://www.tulaliptribes- nsn.gov/Portals/0/pdf/departments/tribal_court/18380_VAWA_2013-v3_Minus_Story.pdf [https://perma.cc/2YEN-A5CL]; see also Congressional Briefing on the Impact of VAWA 2013 in Indian Country, INDIAN L. RES. CTR. (Feb. 22, 2011), http://indianlaw.org/safewomen/ congressional-briefing-impact-vawa-2013-indian-country [https://perma.cc/93GL-ZLT6] (quoting Peter Yucupicio as saying that "VAWA jurisdiction is still limited to certain crimes, does not protect victims of stranger rape, and does not protect children or other family members"). 355. NAT'L CONG. OF AM. INDIANS, supra note 30, at 8. 356. Id. at 26. 357. Tulalip Tribes, supra note 354.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RIley, A. R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
RIley, Angela R.
Published
2017-05-11
OpenAlex
W2514905684
Cited by
11
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • LawArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
tribal criminal jurisdiction, tribal sovereignty, self-determination (international law), Indian Country, tribal courts, assimilation, Indian reservations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review