Crime and Governance in Indian Country
Open accessAbstract
Criminal jurisdiction in Indian country is defined by a central, ironic paradox. Recent federal laws expanding tribal criminal jurisdiction are, in many respects, enormous victories for Indian country, as they acknowledge and reify a more robust notion of tribal sovereignty, one capable of accommodating increased tribal control over safety and security on Indian reservations. At the same time, the laws make clear that sovereignty comes at a price, potentially working to effectuate further assimilation of tribal courts and Indian people. As a result, at the same time that tribal sovereignty gains ground in ways critical to autonomy and self-governance, it is simultaneously threatened by exogenous forces that have the potential to homogenize tribal justice systems legally, politically, and—in particular—culturally.This Article offers the first comprehensive assessment of the Tribal Law and Order Act and the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, respectively, to show how they relate to one another on the ground and the implications for tribal sovereignty and self-determination. Ultimately, based on data compiled for the first time as well as extensive secondary sources, I argue that expanded criminal jurisdiction and punishment authority have, perhaps paradoxically, enhanced the ability of tribes to develop and enforce policies, laws, and procedures that are consistent with tribal custom and tradition. This presents a unique opportunity worthy of further exploration. In other words, rather than sovereignty and assimilation expanding in tension with one another, I find that the application of the laws has been experienced in tribal communities, as least anecdotally and preliminarily, as greatly enhancing—not threatening or destroying—tribal sovereignty and Indian cultural survival.Published: Angela R. Riley, "Crime and Governance in Indian Country," 63 UCLA Law Review 1564 (2016).
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This Article offers the first comprehensive assessment of the Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010 and the 2013 reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, arguing that expanded tribal criminal jurisdiction has enhanced tribal sovereignty and cultural survival even as it imposes federal procedural requirements that risk assimilation. Based on VAWA pilot-project case files and secondary/aggregated data, it finds preliminary evidence that implementation improved safety and defendant protections, while urging tribes to use expanded authority to experiment with indigenous restorative justice.
Key findings
- TLOA and VAWA expand tribal criminal authority but condition it on procedural protections aligned with the U.S. Constitution; the paper frames this as a paradox or “double bind” in which sovereignty gains may also bring assimilative pressure.
- During the VAWA pilot project, only five tribes were certified for special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction, and only three initiated prosecutions; there were 28 VAWA cases involving 24 offenders, most resolved by guilty pleas, with only one trial, which resulted in acquittal. No non-Indian defendant filed a writ of habeas corpus.
- TLOA data were opaque, but the paper estimates approximately 30 to 40 TLOA prosecutions during the relevant period, with felony sentencing applied in at least a dozen cases; tribes that were TLOA compliant did not seek enhanced sentencing in any VAWA prosecution.
- Non-Indian domestic violence was a significant problem: it comprised up to 25 percent of all domestic violence cases on the reservation; at Pascua Yaqui, 25 percent of domestic violence cases involved non-Indian defendants, and 15 non-Indian defendants had more than 80 documented prior tribal police contacts; at CTUIR, 29 percent of domestic violence perpetrators in 2011 and 61 percent in 2012 were non-Indian.
Methods
- The author obtained the files from all tribal court VAWA prosecutions during the statutorily defined pilot project window and draws on those case files, extensive secondary sources, and aggregated data.
- The study examines TLOA prosecutions from July 29, 2010, until the close of the VAWA pilot project on March 6, 2015; VAWA was reauthorized on March 7, 2013, and the pilot project ran from February 6, 2014, to March 6, 2015.
- Analysis is organized around three themes—tribal sovereignty versus assimilation, individual versus collective rights, and tribal punishment—and advances a normative proposal for indigenous restorative justice. TLOA analysis relies almost entirely on secondary sources because there is no granular TLOA prosecution data.
Limitations
- The paper states that it is too early to draw broad conclusions from the limited data, including a very small sample size; TLOA data are not granular, tribes neither identified nor catalogued TLOA cases, and there is a severe paucity of data collection and no comparative baseline.
- The paper states that findings are anecdotal and preliminary, and that historical statistics are not available for declination rates of non-Indian crimes, so no viable comparison point exists.
- Evident from the text: the VAWA findings rest on only three prosecuting tribes and 28 cases, with a single trial; the TLOA prosecution count is approximate; and the pilot tribes were already well-positioned for implementation—having law-trained judges, available counsel, and mixed jury pools—which limits generalizability to other tribes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 187 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Preliminary data reveal that the laws are improving the safety and security of reservation residents.
“and the preliminary data reveal that the laws are improving the safety and security of reservation residents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Implementation of TLOA and VAWA has been a success in several respects.
“First, I conclude that implementation has been a success in several respects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Tribes have provided defendants with the requisite procedural protections.
“Tribes have provided defendants with the requisite procedural protections”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The application of the laws has been experienced in tribal communities, at least anecdotally and preliminarily, as greatly enhancing-not threatening or destroying-tribal sovereignty and Indian cultural survival.
“In other words, rather than sovereignty and assimilation expanding in tension with one another, I find that the application of the laws has been experienced in tribal communities, as least anecdotally and preliminarily, as greatly enhancing-not threatening or destroyingtribal sovereignty and Indian cultural survival.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Reports show that the mandatory disclosure requirement has significantly improved declination rates since passage of the Act.
“Reports show that the mandatory disclosure requirement has significantly improved declination rates since passage of the Act.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Williams, supra note 18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Since Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Gov't, the United States recognizes only Metlakatla and a few restricted trust allotments as Indian country in Alaska.
“Since the Supreme Court's ruling in Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Gov't, 522 U.S. 520 (1998), the United States recognizes only Metlakatla and a few restricted trust allotments as Indian country in the state of Alaska.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Gov't, 522 U.S. 520 (1998)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
VAWA was only available during the period under review to a select subgroup of tribes, as authorized by the Department of Justice.
“VAWA, by contrast, was only available during the period under review in this Article to a select subgroup of tribes, as authorized by the Department of Justice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
According to Justice Department statistics, in at least 86 percent of reported cases of rape or sexual assault of American Indian and Alaska Native women, both on and off reservation, victims reported that their attackers were non-Indian.
“According to the Justice Department's own statistics, in at least 86 percent of the reported cases of rape or sexual assault of American Indian and Alaska Native women-both on and off reservation-victims reported that their attackers were non-Indian.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 160 CONG.REC. 26, S941
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
Since the first TLOA report, declination rates have continued to fall.
“Since that time, declination rates have continued to fall.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The remaining 239 tribes are organized as Native Villages in Alaska.
“The remaining 239 tribes are organized as Native Villages in Alaska.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In some documented cases, perpetrators called the tribal police themselves, knowing there would not be a response, arrest, or prosecution.
“In some documented cases, perpetrators even called the tribal police themselves, knowing there would not be a response, arrest, or prosecution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Laird, supra note 31
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
TLOA jurisdiction was available to all tribes as of July 29, 2010.
“TLOA jurisdiction was available to all tribes as of the date of its passage on July 29, 2010.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Tribes implementing both TLOA and VAWA during the pilot project and since have continuously emphasized the importance of criminal authority to tribal sovereignty, which includes the legal and moral obligation to protect tribal citizens.
“The tribes implementing both TLOA and VAWA, respectively-during the pilot project and since-have continuously emphasized the importance of criminal authority to tribal sovereignty, which includes the legal and moral obligation to protect tribal citizens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
There is a severe paucity of data collection with respect to Indians and Indian country issues to set a baseline from which to evaluate change.
“There is a severe paucity of data collection with respect to Indians and Indian country issues to set a baseline from which to evaluate change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Non-Indian domestic violence is a significant problem in Indian communities, comprising up to 25 percent of all domestic violence cases on the reservation.
“First, non-Indian domestic violence is a significant problem in Indian communities, comprising up to 25 percent of all domestic violence cases on the reservation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Both TLOA and VAWA bolster some aspects of tribes' inherent, sovereign authority to prosecute and punish those who commit crimes in Indian country.
“On the one hand, both statutes bolster some aspects of tribes' inherent, sovereign authority to prosecute and punish those who commit crimes in Indian country.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
None of the defendants were subject to tribal criminal jurisdiction until the pilot project was initiated.
“None of the defendants were subject to tribal criminal jurisdiction until the pilot project was initiated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Each VAWA pilot project tribe identified domestic violence against the Native population as an important problem that the tribe needed to address.
“First and foremost, each tribe identified domestic violence against the Native population as an important problem that the tribe needed to address.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
All three pilot project tribes now use the same jury pool for all cases, regardless of the crime or race/identity of the parties.
“And all three tribes now use the same jury pool for all cases, regardless of the crime or race/identity of the parties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most of the non-Indian defendants had long criminal records.
“Most of them had long criminal records.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Beyond the core common feature of domestic violence, the VAWA pilot project tribes represent a wide range of tribal communities in almost every other respect.
“But, beyond this core common feature, the tribes represent a wide range of tribal communities in almost every other respect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Despite the very real fears of increased acculturation, since implementation, there has been relatively little indication of tribal members' concerns over assimilation.
“Despite the very real fears of increased acculturation, since implementation, there has been relatively little indication of tribal members' concerns over assimilation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Despite all possible assimilationist costs, the pilot project tribes saw the implementation of special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction as an absolute necessity for sovereignty.
“Despite all the possible assimilationist costs, the pilot project tribes saw the implementation of special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction as an absolute necessity for sovereignty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Even within tribes that follow the adversarial model more closely, it is not uncommon to find judges that have not been trained in an American law school.
“But even within tribes that follow the adversarial model more closely, it is not uncommon to find judges that have not been trained in an American law school.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
On February 26, 2014, Pascua Yaqui arrested and began prosecution of the first non-Indian defendant since Oliphant.
“On February 26, 2014, Pascua Yaqui arrested and began prosecution of the first non-Indian defendant since Oliphant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
In the four years prior to and during the pilot project period, the fifteen non-Indian defendants prosecuted at Pascua Yaqui under SDVCJ had more than eighty documented prior tribal police contacts.
“In the four years prior to and during the pilot project period, the fifteen non-Indian defendants prosecuted at Pascua Yaqui under SDVCJ had more than eighty documented prior tribal police contacts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
All of the pilot project tribes that initiated prosecutions under VAWA during the pilot project window already employed law-trained judges.
“All of the pilot project tribes that initiated prosecutions under VAWA during the pilot project window, for example, already employed law-trained judges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Tribal members began to detach from the criminal justice system altogether, refusing to participate as witnesses or in other ways.
“Tribal members also begin to detach from the criminal justice system altogether, refusing to participate as witnesses or in other ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Crime was high in Indian country.
“Crime was high.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The federal government has curtailed tribal sovereignty over time.
“Undoubtedly, however, the federal government has curtailed that sovereignty over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Offenders view tribal justice as ineffectual.
“Offenders also have this view of tribal justice as ineffectual.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Not one non-Indian defendant prosecuted under VAWA filed a writ of habeas corpus to claim his or her constitutional rights had been violated.
“And not one non-Indian defendant prosecuted under VAWA filed a writ of habeas corpus to claim his or her constitutional rights had been violated.250”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tribal Justice: Prosecuting Non-Natives for Sexual Assault on Reservations, supra note 215
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
All three of the VAWA pilot project tribes provide lawyers to all who want one, regardless of the crime.
“In regards to the right to counsel, for example, all three of the VAWA pilot project tribes provide lawyers to all who want one, regardless of the crime.249”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG.OF AM.INDIANS, supra note 30
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Not one defendant during this period filed a challenge to test the constitutionality of VAWA.
“In addition, not one defendant during this period filed a challenge to test the constitutionality of VAWA.253”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Others were referred to the federal government for prosecution, due either to the severity or nature of the crime.
“Others were referred to the federal government for prosecution, due either to the severity or nature of the crime.275”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG.OF AM.INDIANS, supra note 30
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
There were approximately thirty to forty TLOA prosecutions during the relevant time frame.
“Though TLOA data is particularly opaque, there were approximately thirty to forty TLOA prosecutions during the relevant time frame.271”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FOLSOM-SMITH, supra note 83
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Currently, all three VAWA pilot project tribes use a mixed jury pool for all their tribal court cases.
“Currently, both for better political participation by all reservation residents and for the sake of efficiency, all three VAWA pilot project tribes use a mixed jury pool for all their tribal court cases.266”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG.OF AM.INDIANS, supra note 30
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Of all the cases brought under the special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction provision of VAWA during the pilot project period-around two dozen-only one went to trial.
“Of all the cases brought under the special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction provision of VAWA during the pilot project periodaround two dozen-only one went to trial.264”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG.OF AM.INDIANS, supra note 30
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
In some VAWA cases, after arrest, no charges were filed.
“In some instances, after arrest, no charges were filed.273”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG.OF AM.INDIANS, supra note 30
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Of those VAWA cases that made their way through the criminal justice process, the vast majority resulted in guilty pleas.
“Of those that made their way through the criminal justice process, the vast majority resulted in guilty pleas.276”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG.OF AM.INDIANS, supra note 30
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
At CTUIR, all batterers, regardless whether they are Indian or not, attend intervention treatment that is provided free of charge for all defendants.
“At CTUIR, all batterers, regardless whether they are Indian or not, attend intervention treatment that is provided free of charge for all defendants.280”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leonhard, supra note 86
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Some prosecuting tribes remain focused on rehabilitation, rather than punishment, such as Tulalip, which has an Elders Panel and a Wellness Court, considered core to conceptions of Tulalip justice.
“And some prosecuting tribes remain focused on rehabilitation, rather than punishment, such as Tulalip, which has an Elders Panel and a Wellness Court, considered core to conceptions of Tulalip justice.281”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brewer, TLOA Enhanced Sentencing: The Tulalip Experience
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
Of the more than two dozen arrests under VAWA jurisdiction during the relevant period, most were handled similarly to cases in the state and federal systems.
“Of the more than two dozen arrests under VAWA jurisdiction during the relevant period, most were handled similarly to cases in the state and federal systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG.OF AM.INDIANS, supra note 30
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Reporting by the Bureau of Prisons demonstrates that felony sentencing was applied in at least a dozen TLOA cases.
“Precise sentences in each case are not known, though reporting by the Bureau of Prisons demonstrates that felony sentencing was applied in at least a dozen cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
Those tribes that were also TLOA compliant during the project period did not, in even one case, seek enhanced sentencing for a VAWA prosecution.
“Curiously, those tribes that were also TLOA compliant during the project period did not, in even one case, seek enhanced sentencing for a VAWA prosecution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
At Pascua Yaqui, some defendants were required to go through the culturally based Hiapsi Kuakte, or Centered Spirit, program.
“At Pascua Yaqui, for example, some defendants were required to go through the culturally based Hiapsi Kuakte, or Centered Spirit, program.279”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Motion to Revoke Probation, Pascua Yaqui Tribe v. Alvarez
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The one and only non-Indian defendant in the past forty years to be prosecuted by an Indian tribe and tried by a reservation-based jury resulted in an acquittal.
“The result: The one and only non-Indian defendant in the past forty years to be prosecuted by an Indian tribe and tried by a reservation-based jury resulted in an acquittal.265”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG.OF AM.INDIANS, supra note 30
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
There is no indication that tribes seek to exploit or abuse non-Indians in an exercise of power.
“There is no indication that tribes seek to exploit or abuse non-Indians in an exercise of power.260”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Laird, supra note 31
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
While alternatives to incarceration may be less relevant options for the punishment of outsiders, tribes nevertheless demonstrate, at least in some instances, a desire to take the same approach with non-Indian perpetrators as with Indians.
“While alternatives to incarceration may be less relevant options for the punishment of outsiders, tribes nevertheless demonstrate, at least in some instances, a desire to take the same approach with non-Indian perpetrators as with Indians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The federal government is shifting authority through legislation to tribes without concomitantly shifting the resources to make those justice systems functional.
“That is, the federal government is shifting authority through legislation to tribes without concomitantly shifting the resources to make those justice systems functional.332”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [332]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
There is some evidence that the Bureau of Indian Affairs itself is training tribal police officers and instructing them that they lack the authority to arrest and detain perpetrators until they can be turned over to the correct sovereign with jurisdiction.
“There is some evidence that the Bureau of Indian Affairs itself is training tribal police officers and instructing them that they lack the authority to arrest and detain perpetrators until they can be turned over to the correct sovereign with jurisdiction.344”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [344]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
All three pilot project tribes reported that children are commonly victims or witnesses to domestic violence.
“In fact, all three of the pilot project tribes reported that children are commonly victims or witnesses to domestic violence.355”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG. OF AM. INDIANS, supra note 30, at 8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
In one extreme instance, a non-Indian boyfriend on a three-day methamphetamine bender forced his Indian girlfriend and her child to sit in a chair while he threw knives at them.
“In one extreme instance, a non-Indian boyfriend, who was on a three-day long methamphetamine bender, forced his Indian girlfriend and her child to sit in a chair while he threw knives at them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG. OF AM. INDIANS, supra note 30, at 26
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
In recent years, there have been reports of instances in which tribal police have actually faced intimidation or criminal sanctions themselves for acting as peace officers.
“In recent years, there have 63 UCLA L. REV.1564 (2016) been reports of instances in which tribal police have actually faced intimidation or criminal sanctions themselves for acting as peace officers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [347]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
Only five pilot project tribes were certified to undertake special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction (SDVCJ) over non-Indians: Umatilla, Tulalip, Pascua Yaqui, Fort Peck, and Sisseton-Wahpeton.
“During that time, only five pilot project tribes were certified to undertake special domestic violence jurisdiction (SDVCJ) over non-Indians: the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation in Oregon, the Tulalip Tribes in Washington, and Pascua Yaqui in Arizona.”
- Also stated in: § 358. · plain
“Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes in Montana and Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate in South Dakota were designated as pilot project tribes only one day before the conclusion of the pilot project, and, therefore, had no opportunity to file any cases under VAWA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 358. · plain
- Findingcitation
Children commonly are present during crimes of domestic violence.
“Child abuse has been a particular source of concern, as statistics and common sense bear out that children commonly are present during crimes of domestic violence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG. OF AM. INDIANS, supra note 30, at 8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Often, the abusers were right that tribal police could do nothing to intervene.
“And often, they were right.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
There were approximately thirty to forty TLOA prosecutions during the relevant period.
“These sources indicate there were approximately thirty to forty TLOA prosecutions during the relevant period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In a pre-VAWA world, when tribal police officers respond to a domestic violence call on the reservation and ascertain the perpetrator is non-Indian or are unsure of his identity, these officers often mistakenly believe they cannot even make an arrest.
“Imagine, for example, in a pre-VAWA world, where tribal police officers respond to a domestic violence call on the reservation.Upon arrival, they ascertain the perpetrator is non-Indian, or they are unsure of his identity.As Perrelli puts it, these officers often mistakenly believe they cannot even make an arrest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [346]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Testimony from the legislative history of VAWA revealed incidents where abusers flagrantly abused victims, taunting them that the tribal police could do nothing to intervene.
“The testimony from the legislative history of VAWA itself revealed incidents where abusers flagrantly abused victims, taunting them that the tribal police could do nothing to intervene.345”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [345]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The federal government has jurisdiction over major crimes committed by an Indian, whether the victim is Indian or non-Indian.
“and over major crimes committed by an Indian, whether the victim is Indian or non-Indian.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Criminal jurisdiction in Indian country was disaggregated from territory pursuant to a series of federal interventions motivated both by beliefs in the racial inferiority of Indians and the concomitant desire to assimilate them into White society.
“Pursuant to a series of federal interventions motivated both by beliefs in the racial inferiority of Indians and the concomitant desire to assimilate them into White society, criminal jurisdiction in Indian country was disaggregated from territory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The federal government has jurisdiction over crimes committed in Indian country by a non-Indian against an Indian.
“The federal government also has jurisdiction over crimes committed in Indian country by a non-Indian against an Indian”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The Supreme Court's decision in Oliphant excluded non-Indians from tribal criminal jurisdiction.
“Court's decision in Oliphant, excluding non-Indians”
- Also stated in: § 69. See WILLIAM T. HAGAN, INDIAN POLICE AND JUDGES: EXPERIMENTS IN ACCULTURATION · plain
“Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U. S. 191, 212 (1978), superseded by statute in part”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U. S. 191, 212 (1978)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § 69. See WILLIAM T. HAGAN, INDIAN POLICE AND JUDGES: EXPERIMENTS IN ACCULTURATION · plain
- Premisereasoning
Tribes then and now maintain exclusive jurisdiction over misdemeanor crimes involving only Indians.
“Tribes then, and now, maintain exclusive jurisdiction over misdemeanor crimes involving only Indians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Indian country is the only place within the United States where the racial and political status of the perpetrator and victim bear on the question of which sovereign may exercise jurisdiction in a given instance.
“as Indian country is the only place within the United States where the racial and political status of the perpetrator and victim bear on the question of which sovereign may exercise jurisdiction in a given instance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
By turning the standard presumption on its head in Indian country, Indian tribes lost a core prerogative of the sovereign, losing the right to punish the non-Indian offender, even when he commits a crime against an Indian.
“By turning this presumption on its head in Indian country, Indian tribes lost a core prerogative of the sovereign, losing the right to punish the non-Indian offender, even when he commits a crime against an Indian.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Criminal jurisdiction over Indian country crimes is governed by shifting and sometimes contradictory variables, including where the crime was committed, whether both the defendant and victim are Indians, and the classification of the alleged crime.
“The bizarre result is that criminal jurisdiction over Indian country crimes is governed by shifting and sometimes contradictory variables, including where the crime was committed, whether both the defendant and victim are Indians, 37 and the classification of the alleged crime, among other considerations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
The criminal justice crisis in Indian country today is a manifestation of a failure of law so extreme that it has actually caused reservation crime to flourish.
“The criminal justice crisis that exists in Indian country today is a manifestation of a failure of law so extreme that it has actually caused reservation crime to flourish.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Congress' goal in ICRA was to balance individual rights with the federal policy of tribal self-determination.
“as Congress' goal was to balance individual rights with the federal policy of tribal self-determination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe (1978) held that Indian tribes do not have criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians.
“the 1978 Supreme Court decision of Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, wherein the Court held that Indian tribes do not have criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 sets forth rights guaranteed to individual Indians vis-à-vis tribal governments.
“manifesting in the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 (ICRA), which sets forth rights guaranteed to individual Indians vis-à-vis tribal governments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
United States v. McBratney (1881) held that the state had exclusive jurisdiction over a crime committed by a non-Indian against a non-Indian in Indian country.
“until the Supreme Court decided United States v. McBratney 50 in 1881, holding that the state had exclusive jurisdiction over a crime committed by a non-Indian against a non-Indian in Indian country.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites United States v. McBratney, 104 U.S. 621 (1881)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
After ICRA and Oliphant, Indian tribes are set adrift.
“Indian tribes are set adrift.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The U.S. Constitution does not bind tribal governments.
“The U.S. Constitution does not bind tribal governments.”
- Also stated in: § Crime and Governance 1577 · plain
“the Constitution, which has never been amended to incorporate tribal governments into the federal-state system, does not bind Indian tribal governments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Crime and Governance 1577 · plain
- Interpretationnone given
The recent federal laws expanding tribal criminal jurisdiction acknowledge and reify a more robust notion of tribal sovereignty capable of accommodating increased tribal control over safety and security on Indian reservations.
“as they acknowledge and reify a more robust notion of tribal sovereignty, one capable of accommodating increased tribal control over safety and security on Indian reservations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The 1885 Major Crimes Act extended federal jurisdiction to enumerated major crimes committed by an Indian in Indian country, whether the victim is Indian or non-Indian.
“It extended federal jurisdiction to enumerated major crimes committed by an Indian in Indian country, whether the victim is Indian or non-Indian.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1153 (2012)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
VAWA 2013 recognizes-for the first time since 1978-tribes' inherent criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians who commit acts of domestic violence, dating violence, or intimate partner violence against an Indian in Indian country if certain criteria are met.
“the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) in 2013, which recognizes-for the first time since 1978-tribes' inherent criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians who commit acts of domestic violence, dating violence, or intimate partner violence against an Indian in Indian country if certain criteria are met.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Recent federal laws expanding tribal criminal jurisdiction are, in many respects, enormous victories for Indian country.
“Recent federal laws expanding tribal criminal jurisdiction are, in many respects, enormous victories for Indian country”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The recent federal laws make clear that sovereignty comes at a price, potentially working to effectuate further assimilation of tribal courts and Indian people.
“At the same time, the laws make clear that sovereignty comes at a price, potentially working to effectuate further assimilation of tribal courts and Indian people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
ICRA initially limited punishments to six months in prison or $500 per count.
“ICRA also set the stage for the debates decades later around the Tribal Law and Order Act, as ICRA initially limited punishments to six months in prison or $500 per count.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
The federal government maintains its historic and continued role as a significant player in ensuring criminal justice in Indian country.
“Accordingly, the federal government maintains its historic and continued role as a significant player in ensuring criminal justice in Indian country.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Except for selectively applied federal laws, Indian country is free from state criminal jurisdiction when an Indian is involved in the crime as either the victim or the perpetrator.
“Except for selectively applied federal laws, 58 Indian country is free from state criminal jurisdiction when an Indian is involved in the crime as either the victim or the perpetrator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
As part of the trade-off for increased tribal criminal authority, both TLOA and VAWA require that tribes follow additional procedural requirements and standards that are more in line with the federal Constitution.
“Thus, as part of the trade-off for increased tribal criminal authority, both statutes require that tribes follow additional procedural requirements and standards that are more in line with the federal Constitution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Absent treaty provisions to the contrary, federal criminal laws of general applicability apply in Indian country to all people just as they apply elsewhere.
“Absent treaty provisions to the contrary, federal criminal laws of general applicability apply in Indian country to all people just as they apply elsewhere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Expanded criminal jurisdiction and punishment authority have, perhaps paradoxically, enhanced the ability of tribes to develop and enforce policies, laws, and procedures that are consistent with tribal custom and tradition.
“Ultimately, based on data compiled for the first time as well as extensive secondary sources, I argue that expanded criminal jurisdiction and punishment authority have, perhaps paradoxically, enhanced the ability of tribes to develop and enforce policies, laws, and procedures that are consistent with tribal custom and tradition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
TLOA allows tribes, under specified conditions, increased sentencing authority.
“the Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010 (TLOA), 27 which allows tribes, under specified conditions, increased sentencing authority”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
ICRA protections map onto, but are not coterminous with, the protections afforded under the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights.
“These protections map onto, but are certainly not coterminous with, the protections afforded under the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The Supreme Court held in Worcester v. Georgia-as it still holds today-that state criminal laws generally do not apply in Indian country.
“The Supreme Court held then-as it still holds today-that state criminal laws generally do not apply in Indian country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The 2007 Amnesty International Report highlighted jurisdictional and institutional barriers, many attributed to federal government neglect, that made Indian women particularly vulnerable to sexually violent crimes with little access to adequate justice systems.
“The 2007 Amnesty International Report again highlighted the jurisdictional and institutional barriers-many of which were attributed to federal government neglect-that made Indian women particularly vulnerable to sexually violent crimes with little access to adequate justice systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites AMNESTY INT'L, supra note 18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
TLOA's requirement that the government collect and disclose data regarding declination of prosecutions was meant to increase political accountability and transparency between tribes and the federal government.
“The second feature of TLOA-the requirement that the government collect and disclose data regarding the declination of prosecutions-was meant to increase political accountability and transparency between tribes and the federal government.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites TLOA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
TLOA's due process requirements and the need for tribes to redefine crimes subject to felony-level sentencing meant there was a significant ramp up period, even for tribes with well-funded and well-developed legal systems.
“However, TLOA's due process requirements as well as the need for tribes to redefine crimes subject to felony-level sentencing meant there was a significant ramp up period, even for tribes with well-funded and well-developed legal systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By depriving tribes of the localized community control that characterizes virtually all law enforcement in the United States, federal policy itself caused the descent of Indian country into crisis.
“By depriving tribes of the localized community control that characterizes virtually all law enforcement in the United States, federal policy itself caused the descent of Indian country into crisis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Washburn, Five Years of Scholarship, supra note 25
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The writ of habeas corpus remains available for any defendant to take his or her case to a federal court to challenge a tribal court conviction.
“The writ of habeas corpus remains available for any defendant to take his or her case to a federal court to challenge a tribal court conviction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 25 U.S.C. § 1303 (2012)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
TLOA and VAWA have empowered tribal leaders and tribal communities to take action on the ground where crime and violence has become the hallmark of some reservations.
“This, in turn, has empowered tribal leaders and tribal communities to take action on the ground where the scourge of crime and violence has become the hallmark of some reservations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
As with TLOA, VAWA puts into place more protections for criminal defendants in tribal courts than were required previously.
“As with TLOA, VAWA puts into place more protections for criminal defendants in tribal courts than were required previously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
VAWA authorizes grants to tribal governments to strengthen tribal criminal justice systems to assist Indian tribes in exercising special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction, including alternative rehabilitation centers.
“VAWA authorizes: (f) . . .grants to the governments of Indian tribes (or to authorized designees of those governments)-(1) to strengthen tribal criminal justice systems to assist Indian tribes in exercising special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction, including-. . .(F) alternative rehabilitation centers;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites VAWA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The federal government does not have the time, money, or incentives to investigate and prosecute most Indian country crimes.
“But the federal government simply does not have the time, money, or incentives to investigate and prosecute most Indian country crimes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Washburn, American Indians, supra note 25
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Of the 4.6 million people living in Indian country in 2010, 3.5 million were non-Indians who could not be prosecuted by tribal governments.
“Of the 4.6 million people living in Indian country in 2010, 3.5 million were non-Indians who could not be prosecuted by tribal governments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites TINA NORRIS ET AL., THE AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKAN NATIVE POPULATION: 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
The degree of federal oversight as contrasted between TLOA and VAWA accounts, in part, for the varying extent to which information about implementation has been made available to the public.
“The degree of federal oversight as contrasted between the two statutes also accounts, in part, for the varying extent to which information about implementation has been made available to the public.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Individual tribes began tracking their own statistics, particularly with respect to domestic violence.
“Individual tribes also began tracking their own statistics, particularly with respect to domestic violence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leonhard, supra note 86
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
TLOA has had perhaps its greatest success in requiring the federal government to be more transparent with respect to declination rates.
“Thus, TLOA has had perhaps its greatest success in requiring the federal government to be more transparent with respect to declination rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
If any period of incarceration is to be imposed, VAWA mandates all the same requirements of the TLOA.
“If any period of incarceration is to be imposed, VAWA mandates all the same requirements of the TLOA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites VAWA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The third critical feature of TLOA was to establish the Indian Law and Order Commission (ILOC), charged with developing a comprehensive study of the criminal justice system relating to Indian country.
“The third critical feature of the TLOA was to establish the Indian Law and Order Commission (ILOC), which was charged with developing a comprehensive study of the criminal justice system relating to Indian country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites TLOA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Every crime, even misdemeanors, committed by non-Indians against Indians or Indian property in Indian country can only be prosecuted by the federal government.
“This means, for example, that every crime-even misdemeanors-committed by non-Indians against Indians or Indian property in Indian country can only be prosecuted by the federal government.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Violence Against Women Act
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
When a non-Indian commits a crime against an Indian in Indian country, absent a unique statutory modification, the only sovereign with jurisdictional authority is the federal government.
“when a non-Indian commits a crime against an Indian in Indian country-absent a unique statutory modification-the only sovereign with jurisdictional authority is the federal government.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Public Law 280
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Violence Against Women Act
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Increased authority could come at the cost of sovereignty.
“Given this dilemma, it has been apparent since the debates on the statutes began that increased authority could, ironically, come at the cost of sovereignty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
VAWA clarifies tribes' sovereign power to issue and enforce civil protection orders that are violated in the Indian country of the participating tribe.
“VAWA also clarifies tribes' sovereign power to issue and enforce civil protection orders that are violated in the Indian country of the participating tribe.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites VAWA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Studies show that countless Indian women and girls decline to report violent crime or sexual assault committed by non-Indians on the reservation because they do not believe there will be justice.
“Studies show that countless Indian women and girls decline to even report violent crime or sexual assault committed by non-Indians on the reservation because they do not believe there will be justice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Laird, supra note 31
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
For some tribes-particularly those without criminal courts, with very small reservation populations, or limited funds-implementation of TLOA or VAWA may not be feasible or even desirable.
“For some tribes-particularly those that do not already have criminal courts in place, have very small reservation populations to draw from for human capital, or have limited funds with overwhelming social problems requiring their scant resources-implementation may not be feasible or even desirable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Under the TLOA, tribes are authorized to impose enhanced punishments of up to three years and fines of up to $15,000 where particular procedural protections are in place.
“Under the TLOA, tribes are authorized to impose enhanced punishments of up to three years and fines of up to $15,000 where particular procedural protections are in place.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tribal Law & Order Act of 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The TLOA's defining provisions allow tribes enhanced sentencing over defendants in cases in which the tribe would already have criminal jurisdiction.
“The TLOA's defining provisions allow tribes enhanced sentencing over those defendants in cases in which the tribe would already have criminal jurisdiction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tribal Law & Order Act of 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
In regards to judges' qualifications, both statutes were left somewhat vague due to the proliferation of judges in tribal communities that have not been trained in ABA-accredited law schools.
“In regards to judges' qualifications, for example, both statutes were left somewhat vague due to the proliferation of judges in tribal communities that have not been trained in ABA-accredited law schools.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The pilot project tribes under VAWA and the early adopters of TLOA were already well-positioned to implement the new laws.
“In other words, the pilot project tribes under VAWA and the early adopters of TLOA were already well-positioned to implement the new laws.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The enactment of both TLOA and VAWA raises a paradox for Indian tribes.
“Thus, the enactment of both TLOA and VAWA raises a paradox for Indian tribes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The federal government-and the Supreme Court in particular-views the sovereign authority of tribes as less than complete.
“Accordingly, while tribes continue to assert their sovereignty, selfgovernance, and treaty rights, it is clear that the federal government-and the Supreme Court in particular-views the sovereign authority of tribes as less than complete.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Even given the very small sample size available in this analysis, some preliminary evidence begins to paint at least a partial picture as to the impact that TLOA and VAWA are having on the ground.
“However, even given the very small sample size available in this analysis, some preliminary evidence begins to paint at least a partial picture as to the impact that the statutes are having on the ground.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Each tribe has had to think about the issue of TLOA/VAWA implementation as it relates to its particular circumstances, including the potential for assimilative impositions.
“Each tribe has had to think about the issue as it relates to its particular circumstances, including the potential for assimilative impositions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The dearth of data in Indian country criminal justice makes it exceedingly difficult for tribes, tribal leaders, and the federal government to adequately assess the gaps in Indian country criminal justice.
“In fact, the dearth of data in the area of Indian country criminal justice makes it exceedingly difficult for tribes, tribal leaders, and the federal government to adequately assess the gaps in Indian country criminal justice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Tribes most resistant to a Western model-and that would, therefore, be more likely to report a negative reaction to encroaching forces-are among the least likely to have sought implementation.
“Tribes most resistant to a Western model-and that would, therefore, be more likely to report a negative reaction to encroaching forces-are among the least likely to have sought implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Despite VAWA reauthorization amendments including Alaska, Alaska Native village governments have relatively limited authority outside Metlakatla.
“Accordingly, despite amendments to the reauthorization of VAWA to include the state of Alaska, village governments have relatively limited authority outside of Metlakatla.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The laws have made a profound difference for the pilot project tribes.
“Thus, the laws have made a profound difference for these tribes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A tribe's perspective of what qualifies a judge may be quite distinct from an American perspective.
“Oftentimes, a tribe's perspective of what qualifies a judge may be quite distinct from an American perspective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The pilot project tribes are able to prosecute and incapacitate defendants who have committed ongoing acts of domestic violence for years.
“They are able to prosecute and incapacitate defendants who have committed ongoing acts of domestic violence for years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Contrary to some assumptions about risks of assimilation, thus far it appears that the expansion of criminal jurisdiction for tribes enhances-rather than impedes or usurps-the cultural, political, and legal fabric of tribal life that allows tribal nations to continue to thrive as distinct sovereigns within the larger polity.
“Contrary to some assumptions about the risks of assimilation, thus far it appears that the expansion of criminal jurisdiction for tribes enhances-rather than impedes or usurps-the cultural, political, and legal fabric of tribal life that allows tribal nations to continue to thrive as distinct sovereigns within the larger polity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The lack of law enforcement contributed to a sense of lawlessness on the reservation.
“This lack of law enforcement, as was well documented in the testimony leading up to VAWA's reauthorization, contributed to a sense of lawlessness on the reservation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Each of the VAWA pilot project tribes has unique demographic features that made the expanded jurisdiction under VAWA important to sovereignty.
“Each of the VAWA pilot project tribes has unique demographic features that made the expanded jurisdiction under VAWA important to sovereignty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The Courts of Indian Offenses were established throughout almost all of Indian country.
“The Courts of Indian Offenses were established throughout almost all of Indian country.233”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Creel, supra note 68
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
To the extent empirical evidence is available, it reflects a trend in Indian country towards providing paid counsel.
“To the extent empirical evidence is available, it reflects a trend in Indian country towards providing paid counsel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
When Congress amended the ICRA in 1986 to expand tribes' sentencing authority from six months to one year per count and a $5000 fine, it seemingly did so without reviewing or contemplating the impact the expansion would have on tribal defendants.
“Accordingly, when Congress amended the ICRA in 1986 to expand tribes' sentencing authority under the ICRA-from six months to one year per count and a $5000 monetary fine 239 -it seemingly did so without reviewing or contemplating the impact the expansion would have on tribal defendants.240”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Creel, supra note 68
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Many of the same considerations that must be weighed in prosecuting Indians are present in VAWA cases as well.
“This means many of the same considerations that must be weighed in prosecuting Indians-who are parents to Indian children, employees of the tribe, etc.-are present in these cases as well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
When Congress heard testimony about civil rights abuses in tribal courts in the 1960s, it was well established that the federal model imposed onto tribal governments had not required, allowed for, or funded paid counsel for indigent defendants.
“Thus, as discussed in Part I, when Congress heard testimony about civil rights abuses in tribal courts in the 1960s, it was well established that the federal model imposed onto tribal governments had not required, allowed for, or funded paid counsel for indigent defendants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Preliminary results from the relevant TLOA and VAWA cases at least lend the inference that tribes can and do respect the constitutional rights of defendants.
“While being cautious not to draw sweeping conclusions based on a very small set of cases, the preliminary results from the relevant TLOA and VAWA cases at least lend the inference that tribes can and do respect the constitutional rights of defendants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG.OF AM.INDIANS, supra note 30
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
With so few American Indian attorneys in the United States at the time, requiring counsel would necessarily allow non-Indians a more active role in American Indian tribal courts.
“With so few American Indian attorneys in the United States at the time, requiring counsel would necessarily allow non-Indians a more active role in American Indian tribal courts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
As to non-Indians tried under VAWA, tribal governments have similar motivations and concerns.
“As to non-Indians tried under VAWA, tribal governments have similar motivations and concerns.258”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CORNELL, CURTIS & JORGENSEN, supra note 109
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
When Congress expanded tribal sentencing authority in 1986, it did not renew review of ICRA's provisions regarding the right to counsel for indigent defendants.
“Given that the original sentencing limitations were put in place at a time when Congress likely did not consider the possibility of felony prosecutions by tribal courts, the expansion in sentencing merited, but did not receive, renewed review of ICRA's provisions regarding the right to counsel for indigent defendants.241”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
These ties provide meaningful incentives for tribal governments to be fair, just, and legitimate, seeking to act as good governments to advance victims' rights while ensuring fair criminal processes for defendants.
“These all provide meaningful incentives for tribal governments to be fair, just, and legitimate, seeking to act as “good governments” to advance victims' rights while ensuring fair criminal processes for defendants.257”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CORNELL, CURTIS & JORGENSEN, supra note 109
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Much of the testimony and information leading up to and since the implementation of the statutes demonstrate pride on the part of tribal court staff regarding the quality of justice and fairness tribal courts are able to provide, often with a fraction of the resources available to state and federal courts.
“Much of the testimony and information leading up to and since the implementation of the statutes demonstrate pride on the part of tribal court staff-judges, clerks, lawyers, and others-regarding the quality of justice and fairness tribal courts are able to provide, often with a fraction of the resources available to state and federal courts.259”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 2008 Hearing, supra note 84
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Even before debate began over these recent laws, when tribes have had the financial resources to provide lawyers for indigent defendants in adversarial style proceedings, they largely have done so.
“Even before debate began over these recent laws, when tribes have had the financial resources to provide lawyers for indigent defendants in adversarial style proceedings, they largely have done so.246”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Washburn, Tribal Courts and Federal Sentencing, supra note 25
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In cases where such counsel is not affordable, tribes often have provided lay advocates to indigent defendants in tribal court proceedings.
“In cases where such counsel is not affordable, tribes often have provided lay advocates-those who are authorized to provide defense services to defendants, but who may not otherwise be legally trained-to indigent defendants in tribal court proceedings.247”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fortin, supra note 87
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Washburn, Tribal Courts and Federal Sentencing, supra note 25
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
When it comes to Indian defendants, tribal governments have powerful incentives to ensure fairness.
“When it comes to Indian defendants, for example, tribal governments have powerful incentives to ensure fairness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CORNELL, CURTIS & JORGENSEN, supra note 109
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The legislative record shows that the decision regarding the right to counsel was driven by both cultural and fiscal considerations.
“the legislative record shows that the decision regarding the right to counsel was driven by both cultural and fiscal considerations.236”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 1961 Hearing, supra note 76
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In recent years, tribes, academics, and policymakers have become more vocal about the consequences of securing tribal court convictions without the aid of a lawyer.
“In recent years, tribes, academics, and policymakers have become more vocal about the consequences of securing tribal court convictions without the aid of a lawyer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Creel, supra note 68
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The trade-off was reflected in the limited authority of tribes to sentence tribal defendants only to six months in jail or a $500 fine, or both.
“The trade-off was reflected in the limited authority of tribes to sentence tribal defendants only to six months in jail or a $500 fine, or both.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Creel, supra note 68
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
When the United States forced the adversarial system of trial and punishment onto tribes, it did so without concern for protecting the rights of Indian defendants.
“When the United States forced the adversarial system of trial and punishment onto tribes, it did so without concern for protecting the rights of Indian”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
CTUIR's Office of Legal Counsel encouraged the first defendant under VAWA to file a habeas petition to test the statute.
“In fact, as CTUIR reports, the Tribe's Office of Legal Counsel encouraged the first defendant under VAWA to file a habeas petition to test the statute.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These options seem to have been exercised less than they might otherwise be, partially because many federal grants and funding streams are distinctly geared towards an American carceral model.
“Nevertheless, these options seem to have been exercised less than they might otherwise be, partially because many federal grants and funding streams are distinctly geared towards an American carceral model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
In contrast to the national conversation focused on softening criminal penalties, tribal advocates pushed for TLOA with the opposite motivation: enhanced sentencing authority.
“In contrast to the national conversation, focused on how and to what extent criminal penalties should be softened, tribal advocates pushed for TLOA with the opposite motivation: enhanced sentencing authority.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Concerns regarding the right to counsel translated to whether non-Indian defendants could get a fair trial in tribal court, which motivated the concession that guaranteed defendants a cross-section of the community in a jury trial.
“any of the same concerns regarding the right to counsel translated to whether non-Indian defendants could get a fair trial in tribal court, which motivated the concession that guaranteed defendants a cross-section of the community in a jury trial.263”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Weisman, supra note 130
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Washburn, American Indians, supra note 25
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
In pursuing prosecutions under TLOA and VAWA, tribes have been able to shrink the disparity between tribal and other governments in matters of criminal justice.
“Thus, in pursuing prosecutions under TLOA and VAWA, respectively, tribes have been able to shrink the disparity between tribal and other governments in matters of criminal justice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Evidence suggests-in regards to domestic violence in particular-that absence of accountability for perpetrators only emboldens them.
“Evidence suggests-in regards to domestic violence in particular-that absence of accountability for perpetrators only emboldens them.284”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites S. 1763, S. 872, and S. 1192: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on Indian Affairs
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Some tribal practices today may not be reflective of indigenous culture at all, but rather a consequence of colonial rule.
“Thus, some tribal practices today may not be reflective of indigenous culture at all, but, rather, a consequence of colonial rule.268”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In advocating for enhanced sentences, policymakers focused on the disparity in sentencing authority available to tribes vis-à-vis states in particular.
“In advocating for enhanced sentences, policymakers focused on the disparity in sentencing authority available to tribes vis-à-vis states in particular.270”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FOLSOM-SMITH, supra note 83
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Rejection of the American criminal justice system is in line with Indian nations' own objectives, particularly for at least some juvenile offenses, low-level offenses, or crimes involving substance abuse by tribal member defendants.
“Moreover, it is entirely clear that rejection of this system is in line with Indian nations' own objectives, particularly in regards to at least some juvenile offenses, low-level offenses, or crimes involving substance abuse by tribal member defendants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [295]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Traditional approaches to tribal justice, which focus on making reparations, healing victims and offenders, and restoring community, are in line with alternatives to incarceration.
“There is little doubt that traditional approaches to tribal justice-“which, echoing the Crow Dog case from long ago, focus on making reparations, healing victims and offenders, and restoring community” 306 -are in line with alternatives to incarceration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [306]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Domestic violence offenders escalate their crimes against their victims over time.
“They escalate their crimes against their victims over time.285”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites United States v. Castleman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Tribes may further lose distinct aspects of culture and governance that go to the heart of nationhood, cultural survival, and tribal difference.
“The result is that tribes may further lose distinct aspects”
- Also stated in: § A. Unexplored Opportunities: The Indian Nation as Criminal Justice Laboratory · plain
“of culture and governance that go to the heart of nationhood, cultural survival, and tribal difference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § A. Unexplored Opportunities: The Indian Nation as Criminal Justice Laboratory · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
When Indian tribes prosecute major crimes, such as murder, but are only allowed to sentence the defendant to one year in prison under pre-TLOA ICRA limitations, tribal members lose faith in criminal justice at the tribal as well as the federal level.
“Thus, when Indian tribes prosecute major crimes, such as murder, but are only allowed to sentence the defendant to one year in prison under pre-TLOA ICRA limitations, tribal members lose faith in criminal justice at the tribal as well as the federal level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Many reservations span large swaths of remote territory, sometimes even traversing several states and time zones.
“As Kevin Washburn has demonstrated, many reservations span large swaths of remote territory, sometimes even traversing several states and time zones.298”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [298]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Indian tribes are in a double bind with respect to criminal jurisdiction: to secure recognition of sovereign rights to criminally prosecute and punish crime committed against Indians within the reservation, they must more closely emulate the American model of criminal justice.
“Indian tribes are in a double bind with respect to criminal jurisdiction.In order to secure the recognition of their sovereign rights to criminally prosecute and punish crime committed against Indians within the reservation, they must more closely emulate the American model of criminal justice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Given the complex history between tribes and the United States, tribal members are understandably wary of the federal government, even when community members are in need of law enforcement assistance.
“Given the complex history between tribes and the United States, tribal members are understandably wary of the federal government, even when community members are in need of law enforcement assistance.301”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [301]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
TLOA and VAWA allow for and encourage tribes to continue to implement traditional, alternative sentencing where appropriate.
“Although both TLOA and VAWA, respectively, allow for and encourage tribes to continue to implement traditional, alternative sentencing where it is appropriate, 304”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [304]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
There are significant cultural gaps between tribal communities and federal policing.
“Moreover, there are significant cultural gaps between tribal communities and federal policing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [300]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The United States is failing in its trust responsibility to Indian tribes.
“But it is failing in that duty.287”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eid, The Tribal Law and Order Act
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Communicating with witnesses and convincing them to travel distances to testify in often foreign courts is exceedingly difficult.
“Communicating with witnesses, as well as convincing them to travel those distances to testify in what are often seen as “foreign” courts, is exceedingly difficult.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [298]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
While a tension exists, it is possible for the ascension of tribal criminal authority and tribal cultural survival to coexist and even to mutually reinforce one another.
“This Part seeks to show that, while a tension undoubtedly exists, it is possible for the ascension of tribal criminal authority and tribal cultural survival to coexist and even to mutually reinforce one another.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The ILOC's Roadmap, as well as a host of other sources, concluded definitively that tribes have to be at the center of efforts to protect reservation communities.
“The ILOC's Roadmap, as well as a host of other sources, concluded definitively that tribes have to be at the center of efforts to protect reservation communities.297”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [297]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The focus on making reparations, healing victims and offenders, and restoring community is more reflective of the lived experience of Native people.
“The “focus on making reparations, healing victims and offenders, and restoring community” is more reflective of the “lived experience” of Native people.295”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [295]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
More robust sovereign authority in criminal justice forces tribes to adopt models of government that may be assimilative at their core.
“Paradoxically, then, more robust sovereign authority in this realm concomitantly forces tribes to adopt models of government that may, in fact, be assimilative at their core.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Federal prosecutors' offices and courts can be hundreds of miles away.
“Federal prosecutors' offices and courts can be hundreds of miles away.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [298]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
As a general matter, tribes aspire and prefer to offer an array of restorative justice options.
“As a general matter, tribes aspire and prefer to offer an array of restorative justice options, 296”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [296]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Because of the unique relationship between the federal government and Indian tribes, the United States has a trust responsibility to Indian tribes.
“Because of the unique relationship between the federal government and Indian tribes, the United States has a trust responsibility to Indian tribes.286”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wood, Indian Land and the Promise of Native Sovereignty
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Singer, supra note 15
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The ILOC's report contains evidence, also found within the record of consultation between tribal and federal governments regarding TLOA, that tribes and tribal leaders overwhelmingly expressed a desire for greater use of alternatives to detention in Indian country.
“The ILOC's report is replete with evidence-also found within the record of consultation between tribal and federal governments regarding the implementation of TLOA-that tribes and tribal leaders overwhelmingly “expressed a desire for greater use of alternatives to detention in Indian country.”305”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [305]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Based on evidence from tribal communities and the writings of experts who have worked on the ground on issues of criminal justice on reservations, there is a broad consensus that putting authority back into tribes and tribal governments will, on net, have positive benefits for safety and security on reservations.
“Setting aside whether such an approach would be beneficial nationally, based on evidence from tribal communities and the writings of experts who have worked on the ground on issues of criminal justice on reservations, there is a broad consensus that putting authority back into tribes and tribal governments will, on net, have positive benefits for safety and security on reservations.303”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [303]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Throughout Indian country, disputes are resolved in justice systems of many varieties, some of which may significantly deviate from American-style courts.
“Throughout Indian country, disputes are resolved in justice systems of many varieties, some of which may significantly deviate from American-style courts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [319]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Tribes may elect to integrate traditional practices at all stages of the criminal justice process.
“Tribes may, therefore, elect to integrate traditional practices at all stages of the criminal justice process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
What we are witnessing in Indian country criminal justice is the indigenization of modernity; that is, where tribes seek to take the best of the Western model while still focusing on tribal laws, traditions, and values.
“What we are witnessing in Indian country criminal justice is the “indigenization of modernity”; 322 that is, where tribes seek to take the best of the Western model while still focusing on tribal laws, traditions, and values.323”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [322]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [323]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Past practice tells us that indigenous alternatives in tribal communities can flourish where tribes have the resources to implement them.
“Past practice tells us that indigenous alternatives in tribal communities can flourish where tribes have the resources to implement them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This creates a severe detriment to public safety in Indian country.
“This creates a severe detriment to public safety in Indian country.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Tribes have historically expressed skepticism around various procedural features of the American criminal justice system.
“Tribes have historically expressed skepticism around various procedural features of the American criminal justice system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [319]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
By seeking cultural match between core tribal infrastructure and contemporary governance, the chances of success in terms of economics, health, safety, welfare, and well-being increase dramatically for tribes.
“By seeking this “cultural match” between core tribal infrastructure and contemporary governance, the chances of success-in terms of economics, health, safety, welfare, and well-being-increase dramatically for tribes.324”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [324]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Costs stand as the greatest barrier to making any kind of meaningful change in criminal justice in Indian country.
“Costs stand as the greatest barrier to making any kind of meaningful change in criminal justice in Indian country.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Despite enthusiasm for alternatives to incarceration, leaders and policymakers at the tribal, state, and federal levels all agree that there are certain crimes that are best handled within the federal and state adversarial court system.
“Despite the enthusiasm for alternatives to incarceration, leaders and policymakers at the tribal, state, and federal levels all agree that there are certain crimes that are best handled within the federal and state adversarial court system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [321]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Federal policies, with a focus on domination and subordination, have led to economic, social, and political marginalization within once healthy and self-sustaining Indian nations.
“Federal policies, with a focus on domination and subordination, have led to “economic, social, and political marginalization within once healthy and selfsustaining Indian nations.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
As the ILOC and ample evidence from Indian country demonstrate, the most functional Indian country criminal justice systems are those where the sovereigns work together.
“Finally, as the ILOC and ample evidence from Indian country demonstrate, the most functional Indian country criminal justice systems are those where the sovereigns work together.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [331]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
If one examines crime rates, particularly rates of domestic violence, both in Alaska and in the northern Plains, it becomes apparent that the poorest, most vulnerable tribes will largely go unprotected by these statutory changes.
“In fact, if one examines the crime rates-and particularly the rates of domestic violence-both in Alaska and in the northern Plains, it becomes apparent that the poorest, most vulnerable tribes will largely go unprotected by these statutory changes.334”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [334]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Due to impediments laid out in Part I, cases oftentimes are not prosecuted once they are referred to federal or state authorities.
“Unfortunately, due to all the impediments laid out in Part I, cases oftentimes are not prosecuted once they are referred to federal or state authorities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Victims are deterred from reaching out to law enforcement in the case of future incidents.
“Victims are also then deterred from reaching out to law enforcement in the case of future incidents.346”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [346]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The murkiness of arrest authority is more problematic when considered in the context of tribes' special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction (SDVCJ) under VAWA.
“The murkiness of arrest authority is even more problematic if considered in the context of tribes' SDVCJ under VAWA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For many tribes, intergovernmental agreements with surrounding sovereigns have served as the cornerstone of the most functional policing system, allowing cooperation, resource pooling, and crime reduction.
“For many tribes, this has served as the cornerstone of the most functional policing system, allowing cooperation between sovereigns who can work together, pool resources, and make a dent in the current crime epidemic.352”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fletcher, A Unifying Theory of Tribal Civil Jurisdiction, 46 ARIZ. ST. L.J. 779, 816-17 (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
VAWA does not address cases of sexual assault or rape when the non-Indian perpetrator is a stranger to the reservation.
“But VAWA does not address cases of sexual assault or rape when the non-Indian perpetrator is a stranger to the reservation.353”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 25 U.S.C. § 1304(b)(4) (2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Leaving arrest authority as an open question has a profoundly negative impact on Indian tribes.
“Leaving arrest authority as an open question has a profoundly negative impact on Indian tribes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Tribes that have implemented VAWA have demonstrated specific ways in which the law does not go far enough.
“While tribes continue to contemplate steps forward, those that have implemented VAWA, in particular, have demonstrated specific ways in which the law does not go far enough.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The pilot project tribes have articulated a desire for authority to charge crimes committed against child victims and other collateral crimes.
“Likewise, the pilot project tribes have articulated a desire for authority to charge crimes committed against child victims and other collateral crimes as well.354”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tulalip Tribes, Press Release, VAWA 2013 and the Tulalip Tribes Jurisdiction Over Crimes of Domestic Violence, TULALIP TRIBES (Oct. 5, 2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 120
- May combine two claims. 108
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenFor some Indians, obligations to the tribe and ceremonial life may come before the particular rights of individuals.
“For some Indians, obligations to the tribe and ceremonial life may come before the particular rights of individuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningCTUIR acknowledges increases in reporting during the same period.
“CTUIR similarly acknowledges increases in reporting during the same period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenA federal district court has recently upheld the authority of the Secretary of Interior to take land into trust for Alaska Native villages, which could potentially positively impact the villages.
“However, a federal district court has recently upheld the authority of the Secretary of Interior to take land into trust for Alaska Native villages, which could potentially positively impact the villages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThose tribes that implemented VAWA had to apply for approval to be included in the pilot project, and they did so in part because they already had in place many of the procedural mechanisms required under the statute.
“Those tribes that implemented VAWA, for example, had to apply for approval to be included in the pilot project, and they did so in part because they already had in place many of the procedural mechanisms required under the statute.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThis tension has framed many of the conflicts in Indian law and policy for centuries.
“This tension has framed many of the conflicts in Indian law and policy for centuries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTLOA and VAWA both impose additional requirements onto tribes that do not otherwise bind them.
“TLOA and VAWA both impose additional requirements onto tribes that do not otherwise bind them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenTwo of the offenders were convicted felons with Arizona criminal records.
“Two of the offenders were convicted felons with Arizona criminal records.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAmong the pilot project tribes, the right to counsel was readily available-in some cases, for anyone who requested a lawyer, regardless of indigent status-and this had been the practice for some time.
“Similarly, among these tribes the right to counsel was readily available-in some cases, for anyone who requested a lawyer, regardless of indigent status-and this had been the practice for some time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTribes see criminal authority as important because it fulfills a duty to protect tribal members and because it is a central assertion of sovereignty over territory, regardless of who is within territorial boundaries.
“Tribes see this as important because it fulfills a duty to protect tribal members, but also because it is a central assertion of sovereignty over territory, regardless of who is within territorial boundaries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationMany non-Indian defendants lived on the reservation at the time of their arrests, were married to Indians living on the reservation, or had children with tribal members.
“Many lived on the reservation at the time of their arrests, were married to Indians living on the reservation, or had children with tribal members.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThose working in tribal criminal justice posit that the increase in reporting is because victims believe they are safer than before, and that their abusers will not automatically walk free due to jurisdictional loopholes.
“Those working in tribal criminal justice posit that this is because victims believe they are safer than before, and that their abusers will not automatically walk free due to jurisdictional loopholes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAlthough many tribes have expressed a desire to implement TLOA or VAWA, most have not yet done so.
“Although many tribes have expressed a desire to implement TLOA or VAWA, most have not yet done so.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAll of these incidences occurred on the reservation.
“All of these incidences occurred on the reservation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTwo of the non-Indian defendants had outstanding arrest warrants, one for armed robbery in the state of Oklahoma.
“Two had outstanding arrest warrants, one for armed robbery in the state of Oklahoma.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenBoth TLOA and VAWA impose in various ways new standards onto tribes and encourage greater federal court review than existed previously.
“Both statutes impose in various ways new standards onto tribes and encourage greater federal court review than existed previously.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThough there has been increased focus on data collection in Indian country in the last decade, sources are still scant.
“Though there has been increased focus on data collection in Indian country in the last decade, sources are still scant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenScholars have long debated the question of the extent to which Indian tribes do-or ought to-appreciate and preference individual rights over collective rights.
“Scholars have long debated the question of the extent to which Indian tribes do-or ought to-appreciate and preference individual rights over collective rights.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningPeople had begun to lose faith in the criminal justice system altogether, and this was true of both tribal and federal systems.
“People had begun to lose faith in the criminal justice system altogether, and this was true of both tribal and federal systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTribal members experienced the criminal justice system as futile and ineffective, and in many cases stopped calling law enforcement for help.
“Tribal members experienced the criminal justice system as futile and ineffective, and, in many cases, even stopped calling law enforcement for help.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe perpetrators had deep ties to the tribal community.
“The perpetrators had deep ties to the tribal community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenHistorically, some tribal judges were selected because of their status as elders within the community, their deep cultural knowledge, or their standing in the tribe.
“Historically, some tribal judges, for example, were selected because of their status as elders within the community, their deep cultural knowledge, or their standing in the tribe.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationPrior to 2013, the pilot project tribes felt impotent in protecting tribal members, and the problem of domestic violence raised particular issues at places like Pascua Yaqui, where domestic violence is a large part of the criminal docket.
“Research reveals that prior to 2013, the pilot project tribes felt impotent in protecting tribal members, and the problem of domestic violence raised particular issues at places like Pascua Yaqui, where domestic violence is a large part of the criminal docket.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenAnathema to conceptions of Western liberalism, which put the individual at the center of rights frameworks, indigenous societies are oftentimes criticized for prioritizing tribal interests in this way.
“Anathema to conceptions of Western liberalism, which put the individual at the center of rights frameworks, indigenous societies are oftentimes criticized for prioritizing tribal interests in this way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThough there was a vast range in tribal cultures during the colonial period, a common thread among most indigenous communities, then and today, is a tightly cohesive sense of collective rights, responsibilities, and duties.
“Though there was a vast range in tribal cultures during the colonial period, a common thread among most indigenous communities, then and today, is a tightly cohesive sense of collective rights, responsibilities, and duties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningTulalip states that since VAWA was reauthorized, reporting of domestic violence has gone up steadily.
“Tulalip states, for example, that since VAWA was reauthorized, reporting of domestic violence has gone up steadily.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe tension between individual and collective rights as related to tribal communities has been evident virtually since contact between Natives and Europeans.
“The tension between individual and collective rights as related to tribal communities has been evident virtually since contact between Natives and Europeans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe pilot project tribes point to the sharp increase in reporting of domestic violence as another sign that the laws are having a positive impact.
“Similarly, the pilot project tribes point to the sharp increase in reporting of domestic violence as another sign that the laws are having a positive impact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationDuring the period relevant to this study there is only one reported case of a constitutional challenge to a conviction under the TLOA, and it dealt with the question of retroactive application of TLOA's protections.
“During the period relevant to this study there is only one reported case of a constitutional challenge to a conviction under the TLOA, and it dealt with the question of retroactive application of TLOA's protections.254”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites United States v. Bryant, 136 S. Ct. 1954 (2016)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe ICRA does not extend a mandatory right to counsel for indigent defendants to tribes, and, at the time of VAWA's reauthorization, some tribes continued to prosecute Indians without the aid of a lawyer.
“As noted, the ICRA does not extend a mandatory right to counsel for indigent defendants to tribes, and, at the time of VAWA's reauthorization, some tribes continued to prosecute Indians without the aid of a lawyer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe guaranteed right to counsel for indigent defendants was debated vociferously leading up to the reauthorization of VAWA in particular because it would mark the first prosecution of non-Indians by tribal courts in almost forty years.
“The guaranteed right to counsel for indigent defendants was debated vociferously leading up to the reauthorization of VAWA in particular because it would mark the first prosecution of non-Indians by tribal courts in almost forty years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTwo features in particular garnered the greatest debate: the right to counsel for indigent defendants and the makeup of tribal juries.
“But two features in particular garnered the greatest debate: the right to counsel for indigent defendants and the makeup of tribal juries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe system of prosecution, trial, and incarceration in Indian country today was established by federal governmental policies more than one hundred years ago, and the right to counsel is a central feature in the long and complex story of federal-tribal relations.
“The system of prosecution, trial, and incarceration in Indian country today was established by federal governmental policies more than one hundred years ago, and the right to counsel is a central feature in the long and complex story of federal-tribal relations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationNumerous parties asserted that they preferred tribal court to federal court, stating that the tribal process was less formal, less intimidating, offered more focus on treatment and showed more respect to defendants.
“Numerous parties asserted that they preferred tribal court to federal court, stating that the tribal process was less formal, less intimidating, offered more focus on treatment and showed more respect to defendants.277”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leonhard, supra note 86
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe one case that went to trial, prosecuted by Pascua Yaqui, involved a same-sex domestic violence charge committed by one man against the other, who were in an intimate same-sex relationship according to the prosecution.
“That case, prosecuted by Pascua Yaqui, involved a same-sex domestic violence charge committed by one man against the other, who were, according to the prosecution, in an intimate samesex relationship.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenVirtually all of the prosecuting tribes employ some alternatives to incarceration, including diversion courts, batterer treatment programs, or other culturally relevant treatment programs.
“Virtually all of the prosecuting tribes employ some alternatives to incarceration, including diversion courts, batterer treatment programs, or other culturally relevant treatment programs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe jury based its decision on its view that the prosecution had not sufficiently proven the existence of an intimate relationship between the two men, a requirement under VAWA.
“The jury based its decision on its view that the prosecution had not sufficiently proven the existence of an intimate relationship between the two men, a requirement under VAWA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationBoth statutes encourage alternative sentencing, and tribes employed these procedures in numerous places.
“Both statutes encourage alternative sentencing, and tribes employed these procedures in numerous places.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leonhard, supra note 86
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn other VAWA cases, charges were filed but subsequently dismissed due to lack of evidence or because of a failure to meet the requirements for tribal jurisdiction.
“In others, charges were filed but subsequently dismissed due to lack of evidence or because of a failure to meet the requirements for tribal jurisdiction.274”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG.OF AM.INDIANS, supra note 30
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
FindingreasoningTribal sentiment as it pertains to restorative justice seems to be stronger than what is realized in practice.
“Tribal sentiment as it pertains to restorative justice seems to be stronger than what is realized in practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe tribes that have adopted TLOA and VAWA appear to be working under a fairly standard adversarial system, and probation and incarceration appear to be modeled on the federal and state systems.
“the tribes that have adopted the two statutes appear to be working under a fairly standard adversarial system, and probation and incarceration appear to be modeled on the federal and state systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationTribes contemplating VAWA report that a lack of resources is the primary reason they have not implemented the laws.
“Tribes contemplating VAWA report that a lack of resources is the primary reason they have not implemented the laws.336”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [336]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAnother leader at a recent meeting of tribal and federal leaders discussing the impacts of TLOA noted that 80 percent of those incarcerated are substance abuse offenders, and that this is the trend throughout Indian country.
“leader at a recent meeting of tribal and federal leaders discussing the impacts of TLOA similarly noted that 80 percent of those incarcerated are substance abuse offenders, and that this is the trend throughout Indian country.327”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [327]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationTLOA has not improved criminal justice on the Cheyenne River Sioux reservation because it cannot be implemented for lack of funding.
“The Tribal Chairman of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe recently reiterated the point that TLOA has not improved criminal justice on that reservation, because it cannot be implemented for lack of funding.335”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [335]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationIn the Commission's field hearings, leaders repeatedly expressed skepticism of incarceration where other options are available.
“In the Commission's field hearings, leaders repeatedly expressed their skepticism of incarceration where other options are available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [307]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationDespite the fact that tribal police officers are peace officers and have the authority to detain an offender and transport him to the proper authorities, there is confusion among tribal police officers as to the scope of this power.
“Despite the fact that tribal police officers are peace officers and have the authority to detain an offender and “transport him to the proper authorities,” 343 there is confusion among tribal police officers as to the scope of this power.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [343]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationOne of the first domestic violence offenders to take advantage of a tribe's offender treatment program was a non-Indian.
“In fact, one of the first domestic violence offenders to take advantage of a tribe's offender treatment program was a non-Indian.318”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [318]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationSome senators that opposed VAWA have boldly expressed confidence that once the law is challenged in federal court, it will not withstand constitutional scrutiny.
“Some senators that opposed VAWA have boldly expressed confidence, for example, that once the law is challenged in federal court, it will not withstand constitutional scrutiny.340”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [340]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationOne tribal Chairman stated that 97 percent of all calls to police are for either domestic violence or drunk driving.
“In addressing the need for alternatives to incarceration and treatment, one tribal Chairman stated that 97 percent of all calls to police are for either domestic violence or drunk driving.326”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [326]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThough anecdotal, there is a sense that tribes would readily employ more alternatives to the adversary model if they were funded, but many federal grants or programs are linked directly to existing carceral systems.
“Though anecdotal, there is a sense that tribes would readily employ more alternatives to the adversary model if they were funded, but many federal grants or programs are linked directly to existing carceral systems.329”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [329]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationTribes want to employ more traditional remedies, which might even alleviate the need for some of the costs associated with adversarial systems and incarceration, but it is very difficult to get funding for them.
“Tribes want to employ more traditional remedies-which might even alleviate the need for some of the costs associated with adversarial systems and incarceration-but it is very difficult to get funding for them.313”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [313]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe National Congress of American Indians has requested from DOI that the scope of arrest authority of tribal police officers be definitively clarified, but that has yet to happen.
“The National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) has requested from DOI that the scope of arrest authority of tribal police officers be definitively clarified, but that has yet to happen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe relevant time frame for VAWA prosecutions studied is March 7, 2013 to March 6, 2015, during which there were twenty-eight VAWA cases involving twenty-four offenders.
“Thus, the relevant time frame for VAWA prosecutions studied herein is from March 7, 2013 until March 6, 2015, during which time there were twenty-eight VAWA cases involving twenty-four offenders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationBy the end of the relevant period, only three of the five pilot project tribes had initiated prosecutions under VAWA; only approximately nine tribes in the United States had become TLOA compliant.
“By the end of the relevant period, only three of the five pilot project tribes had initiated prosecutions under VAWA; only approximately nine tribes in the United States had become TLOA compliant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes and Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate were designated as pilot project tribes only one day before the conclusion of the pilot project and had no opportunity to file any cases under VAWA.
“Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes in Montana and Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate in South Dakota were designated as pilot project tribes only one day before the conclusion of the pilot project, and, therefore, had no opportunity to file any cases under VAWA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationRecently, a non-Indian violated a protection order on a reservation in California; the tribal police arrested the offender and the tribal police were subsequently prosecuted for restraining and detaining the non-Indian violator, and the prosecution still has not been dropped.
“Recently, a non-Indian violated a protection order on a reservation in California.The tribal police arrested the offender and the tribal police were subsequently prosecuted for restraining and detaining the non-Indian violator.The prosecution still has not been dropped.347”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [347]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) became TLOA compliant in 2011 and handed down the first extended sentence under TLOA in November 2012.
“It is clear that the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) became TLOA compliant in 2011 and handed down the first extended sentence under TLOA in November 2012.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn that case, the tribe could prosecute the non-Indian perpetrator for the crime against the Indian woman but could not prosecute for the crime of child abuse.
“Although the tribe could prosecute the non-Indian perpetrator for the crime against the Indian woman, it could not prosecute for the crime of child abuse.356”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAT'L CONG. OF AM. INDIANS, supra note 30, at 26
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth TLOA and VAWA seek to restore a modicum of tribal sovereignty over criminal justice matters in Indian country.
“Both statutes seek to restore a modicum of tribal sovereignty over criminal justice matters in Indian country.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTribes are subject to the plenary authority of Congress, which has largely upheld federal efforts to set the scope of tribal sovereignty in matters of criminal jurisdiction.
“Nevertheless, tribes are subject to the plenary authority of Congress, which has largely upheld federal efforts to set the scope of tribal sovereignty in matters of criminal jurisdiction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTestimony before Congress revealed inadequate punishments, failures to prosecute, paltry resources for safety and policing, and violence by criminals who seek reservations where they believe they are insulated from prosecution.
“Just in the past few years, testimony given before Congress has revealed countless incidences of inadequate punishments, failures to prosecute, paltry resources for safety and policing, as well as brazen acts of violence by savvy criminals actively seeking to commit crimes on reservations where they believe they are insulated from prosecution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites 2008 Hearing
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Laird, supra note 31
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe 1885 Major Crimes Act was expressly intended to break up traditional tribal justice systems and further the assimilation of Indians into White society.
“In a move expressly intended to break up traditional tribal justice systems and further the assimilation of Indians into White society, Congress passed the 1885 Major Crimes Act.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCongress amended ICRA in 1986 to expand tribes' sentencing authority from six months to one year per count and a $5000 monetary fine, but still did not authorize felony sentencing.
“Congress amended ICRA in 1986 to expand tribes' sentencing authority from six months to one year per count and a $5000 monetary fine, but still did not authorize felony sentencing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe parameters of tribal criminal jurisdiction in the United States have been set largely by the U.S. Supreme Court, though congressional acts have clarified and shaped it.
“The parameters of tribal criminal jurisdiction in the United States, by contrast, have been set largely by the U.S. Supreme Court, though congressional acts certainly have clarified and shaped it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisereasoningIndian country criminal justice is a story of piecemeal interventions-both by Congress and the Supreme Court-that have created the maze within which reservation Indians find themselves today, with devastating consequences.
“What this history demonstrates is that Indian country criminal justice is a story of piecemeal interventions-both by Congress and the Supreme Court-that have created the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLong before the Constitution was drafted and ratified, Indian nations had inherent sovereignty over their people and territories and governed according to their own laws.
“Long before the Constitution was drafted and ratified, Indian nations had inherent sovereignty over their people and territories and governed according to their own laws.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe current system of criminal justice in Indian country is untenable.
“Practically speaking, the current system of criminal justice in Indian country is untenable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningCriminal jurisdiction in Indian country is defined by a central, ironic paradox.
“Criminal jurisdiction in Indian country is defined by a central, ironic paradox.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“But criminal jurisdiction in Indian country is defined by a central, ironic paradox.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe remaining gaps in criminal jurisdiction left exclusively under the authority of the federal government have never been adequately filled.
“And the remaining gaps in criminal jurisdiction left exclusively under the authority of the federal government have never been adequately filled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAt the same time that tribal sovereignty gains ground, it is simultaneously threatened by exogenous forces that have the potential to homogenize tribal justice systems legally, politically, and culturally.
“As a result, at the same time that tribal sovereignty gains ground in ways critical to autonomy and self-governance, it is simultaneously threatened by exogenous forces that have the potential to homogenize tribal justice systems legally, politically, and-in particular-culturally.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTo assert special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction, a tribe must revise its codes to allow for a cross-section of the community to serve on juries, and must not specifically exclude any group of people, including non-Indians.
“To assert special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction (SDVCJ), the tribe must revise its codes to allow for a cross-section of the community to serve on juries, and the tribe must not specifically exclude any group of people (including non-Indians).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites VAWA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIf tribes fully transform tribal institutions rooted in distinct tribal custom and Indian culture, the process of colonization will be complete.
“At the same time, if tribes fully transform tribal institutions, rooted in distinct tribal custom and Indian culture, the process of colonization will be complete.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAfter decades of deteriorating public safety and decreased faith in tribal and federal justice systems, TLOA and VAWA signal a remarkable directional shift in favor of tribal sovereignty.
“After decades of deteriorating public safety and decreased faith in tribal and federal justice systems, the two statutes signal a remarkable directional shift in favor of tribal sovereignty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe ILOC's work resulted in the publication of Roadmap to Justice, the most comprehensive report on Indian country criminal justice ever produced.
“The ILOC's work resulted in the publication of Roadmap to Justice, the most comprehensive report on Indian country criminal justice ever produced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites INDIAN LAW AND ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVAWA guarantees the rights of tribes to impose traditional punishments in tribal court proceedings and allows tribes to seek federal funding to support such programs.
“VAWA guarantees the rights of tribes to impose traditional punishments in tribal court proceedings and allows tribes to seek federal funding to support such programs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites VAWA
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationOf the three hundred plus tribal governments in the lower forty-eight states, 52 percent are located in Public Law 280 states, which was cut out of federal funding for institution-building and development; thus, they tend to be ill-suited currently to adopt TLOA or VAWA.
“Of the three hundred plus tribal governments in the lower forty-eight states, 52 percent are located in Public Law 280 states, which was cut out of federal funding that went to tribes for institutionbuilding and development; thus, they tend to be ill-suited currently to adopt TLOA or VAWA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goldberg & Champagne, Fit for the Twenty-First Century, supra note 24
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCongress reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act in 2013 with tribal provisions, providing the partial Oliphant fix advocates had sought.
“In the face of these startling facts, Congress reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act in 2013 with tribal provisions, providing the partial Oliphant fix advocates had sought.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Violence Against Women Act
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTribes implementing TLOA can stack sentences for crimes, with a maximum term of nine years in prison.
“The tribes implementing TLOA can also stack sentences for crimes, with a maximum term of nine years in prison.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 25 U.S.C. § 1302(a)(7)(D) (2012)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTLOA and VAWA stand as enormous victories for Indian country.
“By most accounts, TLOA and VAWA stand as enormous victories for Indian country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenRoadmap's ultimate recommendation, the Grand Bargain, advocates first and foremost for tribally led solutions to end the epidemic of crime in Indian country.
“Roadmap's ultimate recommendation-the Grand Bargain-advocates, first and foremost, for tribally led solutions to end the epidemic of crime in Indian country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy imposing new standards on tribes that closely align with the federal constitution, TLOA and VAWA draw tribes closer to an American model of criminal justice and potentially further away from distinct tribal practices rooted in Indian difference.
“By imposing new standards on tribes-standards which closely align with those of the federal constitution, to which the tribes are not otherwise bound 153 -the laws draw tribes ever closer to an American model of criminal justice and, concomitantly, potentially further away from distinct, tribal practices that are rooted in Indian difference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationWithout basic public safety, communities deteriorate: students cannot focus on learning, and tribes and individual tribal members cannot engage in economic development, attract business, or grow tourism.
“Without basic public safety, communities deteriorate: Students cannot focus on learning; tribes and individual tribal members cannot engage in economic development, attract business, or grow tourism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 3 TRIBAL LAW AND ORDER ACT OF 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe importance of TLOA was to soften sentencing restrictions and allow tribes to address some of the disparities that occur when the federal government fails to prosecute.
“The importance of TLOA was to soften sentencing restrictions and allow tribes to address some of the disparities that occur when the federal government fails to prosecute.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIndian tribes may only be able to guarantee their sovereign rights to exercise criminal jurisdiction if they do so on the terms of the very government that has sought to dismantle tribal justice systems.
“This raises the concern that Indian tribes may only be able to guarantee their sovereign rights to exercise criminal jurisdiction if they do so on the terms of the very government that has, for so long, sought to dismantle tribal justice systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTribal members lose faith in tribal governments as well as in the federal system.
“Tribal members lose faith in tribal governments as well as in the federal system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt may be that implementation was less jarring for the tribes that have already adopted the laws than others.
“Of course, it may be that implementation was less jarring for the tribes that have already adopted the laws than others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenOne possibility for an increase in reporting could be an increase in domestic violence cases generally, and the reported numbers may merely reflect that trend.
“Of course, one possibility for an increase in reporting could be an increase in domestic violence cases generally, and the reported numbers may merely reflect that trend.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe expanded sovereignty from TLOA and VAWA comes at a price, and potentially assimilative mandates are at the heart of the bargain.
“At the same time, that expanded sovereignty comes at a price-and potentially assimilative mandates are at the heart of the bargain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningThe power to play a peacekeeping role within the community, which may include incarceration, is one of the key distinguishing features of a sovereign.
“The power to play a peacekeeping role within the community, which may include incarceration, is one of the key distinguishing features of a sovereign.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe absence of jurisdiction was destroying the tribes' ability to govern and protect people, to engage in economic development, and to prosper.
“The absence of jurisdiction was destroying the tribes' ability to govern and protect people, to engage in economic development, and to prosper.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe experience of the pilot project tribes provides critical guidance for Indian nations.
“Thus, the experience of the pilot project tribes provides even more critical guidance for Indian nations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningGiven the enormous spectrum of legal systems and cultural practices found across the more than 560 Indian nations in the United States, there is no universal answer to the question of how to balance potentially assimilative federal law with tribal culture and tradition.
“Given the enormous spectrum of legal systems and cultural practices found across the more than 560 Indian nations in the United States, there is no universal answer to the question of how to balance potentially assimilative federal law with tribal culture and tradition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningGiven the state of crime and governance in Indian country, amending codes and taking other steps necessary to exercise criminal authority goes to the legitimacy and capacity of tribes as governments.
“Given the state of crime and governance in Indian country, amending codes and taking other steps necessary to exercise this authority goes to the legitimacy and capacity of tribes as governments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTribes retain their inherent, sovereign authority that long predates the formation of the United States and the adoption of the United States Constitution.
“Tribes retain their inherent, sovereign authority that long predates the formation of the United States and the adoption of the United States Constitution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThere is no standard profile of a tribe that may seek implementation of either TLOA or VAWA.
“Thus, there is no standard profile of a tribe that may seek implementation of either statute.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThis is particularly true where tribes have adopted traditional, indigenous-based forms of dispute resolution, such as the Navajo Peacemaker Court, where formal Western legal training may even be viewed as a detriment.
“This is particularly true where tribes have adopted traditional, indigenous-based forms of dispute resolution, such as with the model set by the Navajo Peacemaker Court, where formal Western legal training may even be viewed as a detriment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIf tribes are too quick to embrace these expansions without considering how they might impact tribal law, culture, and governance, this expansion in authority, in hindsight, might be seen as another instrument of assimilation to erode traditional tribal justice systems.
“If tribes are too quick to embrace these expansions without considering how they might impact tribal law, culture, and governance, this expansion in authority, in hindsight, might be seen as another instrument of assimilation to erode traditional tribal justice systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt is against this backdrop that debates around tribal criminal jurisdiction-both in terms of felony sentencing and jurisdiction over non-Indians-took place when the statutes were considered.
“It is against this backdrop that debates around tribal criminal jurisdictionboth in terms of felony sentencing and jurisdiction over non-Indians-took place when the statutes were considered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA move towards adoption of both TLOA and VAWA, where politically and fiscally feasible, provides an opportunity for tribal governments to exercise, enhance, and enrich tribal sovereignty, and such an exercise of sovereignty goes to the legitimacy and vitality of tribes as nations.
“Building on the work of scholars and practitioners in the field, as well as accounts from tribal officials working in Indian country, this Article shows how a move towards adoption of both TLOA and VAWA, respectively, where politically and fiscally feasible, provides an opportunity for tribal governments to exercise, enhance, and enrich tribal sovereignty, and that such an exercise of sovereignty”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuch knowledge has not always required formal law training from a tribal perspective, and may be inapposite to it.
“Such knowledge has not always required formal law training from a tribal perspective, and, in fact, may be inapposite to it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWhatever concerns the pilot project tribes had regarding assimilation may have already been dealt with in earlier iterations of criminal justice decisions and discussions.
“Whatever concerns they had regarding assimilation may have already been dealt with in earlier iterations of criminal justice decisions and discussions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAfter more than a century of assimilative policies that sought to destroy tribal language, culture, and religion, Indian tribes today are in a period of revitalization and are wary of any further federal imposition onto internal tribal life, governance, and culture.
“After more than a century of assimilative policies that sought to destroy tribal language, culture, and religion, Indian tribes today are in a period of revitalization and are, therefore, wary of any further federal imposition onto internal tribal life, governance, and culture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningA key factor in tribes' decisionmaking and in negotiating possible downsides-including risks of further assimilation-will be whether the laws are having a positive impact on the ground.
“As tribes consider their options, a key factor in decisionmaking and in negotiating the possible downsides-including risks of further assimilation-will be whether the laws are having a positive impact on the ground.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOne safeguard for tribes is the flexibility built into the statutory standards, particularly in regards to both lawyers and judges.
“One safeguard for tribes is the flexibility built into the statutory standards, particularly in regards to both lawyers and judges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningWhen ICRA was enacted in 1968, Congress maintained the status quo and did not extend to tribes the requirement of paid counsel for indigent defendants.
“When ICRA was enacted in 1968, Congress maintained this status quo, and did not extend to tribes the requirement of paid counsel for indigent defendants.235”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 25 U.S.C. § 1302 (2012)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe CFR courts enforced federal Law and Order Codes, and a local Bureau of Indian Affairs officer conducted proceedings.
“The CFR courts enforced federal Law and Order Codes, and a local Bureau of Indian Affairs officer conducted proceedings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fletcher, supra note 18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningTribes know that providing effective counsel in tribal court is good for tribal sovereignty.
“tribes know that providing effective counsel in tribal court is good for tribal sovereignty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Commission found that modifying the ICRA would not only provide more protection for criminal defendants, but would make it more consistent with existing operating procedures in tribal courts.
“The Commission found that modifying the ICRA would not only provide more protection for criminal defendants, but would make it more consistent with existing operating procedures in tribal courts.245”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBeginning largely in the late nineteenth century, the federal government dismantled tribal justice systems and created Courts of Indian Offenses (CIO or CFR courts) in Indian country.
“Beginning largely in the late nineteenth century, the federal government dismantled tribal justice systems and created Courts of Indian Offenses (known as CIO courts or CFR courts) in Indian country.231”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Creel, supra note 68
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe ILOC concluded that, without the right to counsel, the right to due process itself is compromised.
“The Commission concluded that, “without the right to counsel, the right to due process itself is compromised.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationProviding counsel in tribal court is merely a codification of the trend in tribal court practice in general.
“In addition to the fact that providing counsel in tribal court is merely a codification of the trend in tribal court practice in general, 255 tribes know that providing effective counsel in tribal court is good for tribal sovereignty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDefense attorneys and tribal advocates have increasingly called for modifications to the laws to ensure protections for all defendants in tribal court.
“Defense attorneys and tribal advocates have increasingly called for modifications to the laws to ensure protections for all defendants in tribal court.243”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Creel, supra note 68
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe federal government established an Indian police force and a system of tribal criminal justice that has never been tribal.
“As Barbara Creel has written, it established an Indian police force and put into place a system of tribal “criminal justice” that has “never been ‘tribal.’”232”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Creel, supra note 68
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhether Indian defendants are tribal members or not, they are indigenous and likely have ties within the community, often through family, friends, or extended religious or clan relations.
“Whether Indian defendants are tribal members or not, they are indigenous: They likely have ties within the community, often through family, friends, or extended religious or clan relations.256”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CORNELL, CURTIS & JORGENSEN, supra note 109
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenBy definition, for a defendant to be prosecuted under VAWA, he or she must have deep ties to the victim and the community.
“By definition-as discussed in Part I-for a defendant to be prosecuted under VAWA, he or she must have deep ties to the victim and the community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost CFR courts employed judges without legal training, allowed tribal prosecutors to serve dual roles as prosecutor and chief of police, and prohibited the presence of lawyers.
“Most of the courts employed judges without legal training, allowed tribal prosecutors to serve dual roles as prosecutor and chief of police, and prohibited the presence of lawyers.234”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fletcher, supra note 18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningDespite the new extended sentencing authority, no additional resources were allocated to tribes to provide defense counsel, nor was there discussion of the potential constitutional issues uncounseled convictions might raise in the future.
“Despite the new extended sentencing authority, no additional resources were allocated to tribes to provide defense counsel, nor was there discussion of the potential constitutional issues uncounseled convictions might raise in the future.242”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Creel, supra note 68
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Fletcher, supra note 18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIn Indian country, the case has come to stand for the proposition that non-Indians unquestionably can get a fair trial in tribal court.
“At the same time, in Indian country, the case has come to stand for the proposition that non-Indians unquestionably can get a fair trial in tribal court.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningLooking closely at what those working in Indian country criminal justice are saying, their statements explicate how and why prosecutorial authority and felony sentencing make Indian country safer, beyond their implementation in any one particular case.
“But, looking closely at what those working in Indian country criminal justice are saying, their statements explicate how and why prosecutorial authority and felony sentencing make Indian country safer, beyond their implementation in any one particular case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe story of criminal justice in Indian country is the opposite of the story of American criminal justice, which has been one of excessive policing, rabid criminalization, and long sentences.
“But, as pointed out in this Article, the story of criminal justice in Indian country-as with many aspects of federal Indian law-is the opposite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningTo exploit or abuse non-Indians would signal that tribes are petty, corrupt, and incapable of functioning as legitimate governments.
“To do so would be to signal that tribes are petty, corrupt, and incapable of functioning as legitimate governments.261”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DEER, supra note 14
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncarceration is not the only model tribes utilize to punish offenders, and it will be up to each tribe to ultimately determine which crimes, if any, should be subject to an alternative program.
“Undoubtedly, incarceration is not the only model tribes utilize to punish offenders, and it will be up to each tribe to ultimately determine which crimes, if any, should be subject to an alternative program.282”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Laird, supra note 31
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites DEER, supra note 14
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Goldberg, supra note 33
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenWithout comparative data, there is only anecdotal evidence as to the impacts of TLOA and VAWA.
“Again, without comparative data, there is only anecdotal evidence as to the impacts of TLOA and VAWA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe combination of very low probability of prosecution and very light sentences if convicted led to deterioration in both belief and participation in the justice system and, concomitantly, safety and security on the reservation.
“This combination of factors-very low probability of prosecution and very light sentences if convicted-led to deterioration in both belief and participation in the justice system and, concomitantly, safety and security on the reservation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhere TLOA felony sentencing is utilized, it can make a significant difference in the sentence of the defendant and, quite possibly, in the lives of victims or potential victims, particularly if the defendant is a repeat offender.
“Undoubtedly, where TLOA felony sentencing is utilized, it can make a significant difference in the sentence of the defendant and, quite possibly, in the lives of victims or potential victims, particularly if the defendant is a repeat offender.272”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIndian country suffers from gross neglect, characterized by a long history of federal law that attempted to make Indians literally and conceptually invisible, through policies of failed assimilation and geographic confinement.
“Indian country suffers from gross neglect, characterized by a long history of federal law that attempted to make Indians literally and conceptually invisible, through policies of failed assimilation and geographic confinement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn a country where the criminal justice system has been characterized by overpolicing and harsh penalties, tribes have been left to fend for themselves, toiling on reservations with scant resources and strict sentencing limitations.
“Thus, in a country where the criminal justice system has been characterized by overpolicing and harsh penalties, tribes have been left to fend for themselves, toiling on reservations with scant resources and strict sentencing limitations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationToday, federal limitations are as much legal as geographical, as tribes have found themselves trapped in a maze of criminal justice where the federal government has failed to provide the concomitant protections required to satisfy its trust responsibility to Indian tribes.
“Today, federal limitations are as much legal as geographical, as tribes have found themselves trapped in a “maze” 269 of criminal justice where the federal government has failed to provide the concomitant protections required to satisfy its trust responsibility to Indian tribes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 2008 Hearing, supra note 84
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhen felonies occurred on the reservation, the absence of federal prosecution left many crimes unaddressed, feeding a sense of lawlessness and hopelessness.
“First, when felonies occurred on the reservation, the absence of federal prosecution left many crimes unaddressed, feeding a sense of lawlessness and hopelessness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe analysis of recent exercises of tribal criminal authority leaves open the broader question whether enhanced sentencing has made Indian country safer.
“The analysis of recent exercises of tribal criminal authority paints a familiar picture of probation and incarceration, but leaves open the broader question whether enhanced sentencing has made Indian country safer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe absence of some procedural protections, such as the right to counsel, may arguably be inadvertent holdovers from the incomplete imposition of a federal system that imparted adversarial procedures without corresponding safeguards, and that may now be ameliorated by the rise in the number of Native lawyers.
“At the same time, the absence of some procedural protections, such as the right to counsel, may arguably be inadvertent holdovers from the incomplete imposition of a federal system that imparted adversarial procedures without corresponding safeguards, and that may now be ameliorated by the rise in the number of Native lawyers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationExpanding tribal authority from one year to the three years authorized under TLOA does not put tribes on equal footing with states in most cases, but it does take a meaningful step towards leveling the playing field, at least in regards to sentencing.
“Tribal leaders pointed out that, although expanding tribal authority from one year to the three years authorized under TLOA does not put tribes on equal footing with states in most cases, it does take a meaningful step towards leveling the playing field, at least in regards to sentencing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FOLSOM-SMITH, supra note 83
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThose working in Indian country criminal justice repeatedly assert that the complete absence of accountability-a system where perpetrators know the probability of prosecution is incredibly low-actually encourages more crime by offenders, who know they will not be held accountable for their actions.
“Those working in Indian country criminal justice repeatedly assert that the complete absence of accountability-a system where perpetrators know the probability of prosecution is incredibly low-actually encourages more crime by offenders, who know they will not be held accountable for their actions.283”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 2008 Hearing, supra note 84
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThis is entirely against larger tribal objectives of greater self-determination, jurisdiction, and respect.
“This is entirely against larger tribal objectives of greater selfdetermination, jurisdiction, and respect. 262”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CORNELL, CURTIS & JORGENSEN, supra note 109
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThis shifted prosecutorial authority to tribes, who were only able to impose sentences of one year per count, even for major crimes like rape and murder.
“This shifted prosecutorial authority to tribes, who were only able to impose sentences of one year per count, even for major crimes like rape and murder.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenSovereignty over people and territory is essential to a functioning government.
“Sovereignty over people and territory is essential to a functioning government.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLed by scholars like Kevin Washburn, experts on the ground with experience with criminal justice systems have argued for decades for a return to tribally led solutions to crime control.
“Led by scholars like Kevin Washburn, experts on the ground with experience with criminal justice systems have argued for decades for a return to tribally led solutions to crime control.290”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Eid & Doyle, Separate but Unequal
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Washburn, supra note 25
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe federal government has proven that it simply cannot or will not provide the resources and expertise necessary to keep reservations safe.
“The federal government has proven that it simply cannot or will not provide the resources and expertise necessary to keep reservations safe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [297]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe fulfillment of the prerogative of tribes as sovereigns points to other important conceptual reasons why criminal justice authority for tribes is both desired and desirable.
“The fulfillment of the prerogative of tribes as sovereigns further points to other important conceptual reasons why criminal justice authority for tribes is both desired and desirable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningTribes perhaps are not exploring restorative justice options to the fullest extent possible.
“but perhaps are not exploring these to the fullest extent possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe cavalry effect is observed when tribal communities are largely left alone, isolated, with very little guarantee of safety, security, or justice; then when the federal government comes to investigate a crime, it descends on a reservation community to which it has no political, cultural, or social relationship.
“As Washburn refers to it, the “cavalry effect” is observed when tribal communities are largely left alone, isolated, with very little guarantee of safety, security, or justice.300 Then, when the federal government does come in to investigate a crime, it does so by descending on a reservation community to which it has no political, cultural, or social relationship.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [300]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningThe ability of tribes to arrest, prosecute, and, where necessary, punish offenders within Indian country goes to a core governmental duty.
“The ability of tribes to arrest, prosecute, and, where necessary, punish offenders within Indian country goes to a core governmental duty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIndian tribes are the original progenitors of local, traditional and restorative justice practices, and the evidence shows tribes are eager to return to that model, at least in certain instances.
“In many ways, Indian tribes are the original progenitors of local, traditional and restorative justice practices, and the evidence shows tribes are eager to return to that model, at least in certain instances.291”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ex parte Crow Dog
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Estate of Tasunke Witko v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIndian nations are governments, act as governments, and want to be treated like governments.
“Indian nations are governments, act as governments, and want to be treated like governments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA history of racism, abuse, and mistrust works against active participation in the criminal justice system by Indians, who often are wary of outsiders, suspicious of federal authorities, and burdened by poverty and unemployment.
“A history of racism, abuse, and mistrust work against active participation in the criminal justice system by Indians, who often are wary of outsiders, suspicious of federal authorities they do not know, and additionally burdened by poverty and unemployment.299”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [299]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA return to local control in public safety may also be especially useful to facilitate the use of alternatives to incarceration and encourage tribes to experiment with new criminal justice models.
“And, particularly relevant to this Article, a return to local control in public safety may also be especially useful to facilitate the use of alternatives to incarceration and encourage tribes to take advantage of the opportunity to experiment with new criminal justice models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth Indian country criminal justice and the larger national conversation increasingly emphasize local control and responsibility, less federal intrusion, and more emphasis on alternatives to incarceration.
“Both increasingly emphasize: local control and responsibility, less federal intrusion, and more emphasis on alternatives to incarceration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThey are only a first-and for far too many tribes, an infeasible-step towards true Indian country criminal justice reform.
“Undoubtedly, they are only a first-and for far too many tribes, an infeasible-step towards true Indian country criminal justice reform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIn the VAWA cases at Pascua Yaqui, alternatives to incarceration may be particularly inappropriate given that the defendants were non-Indian, had no active engagement in Yaqui cultural life, and were repeat offenders.
“Although, as with the VAWA cases at Pascua Yaqui, in particular, given that the defendants were non-Indian, had no active engagement in Yaqui cultural life, and were repeat offenders, alternatives to incarceration may be particularly inappropriate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationExtensive research shows that encouraging tribes to experiment with punishments that deviate from the state and federal norm is consistent with tribes' own preferences in both procedure and punishment.
“First, I assert that extensive research shows that doing so is consistent with tribes' own preferences in both the realm of procedure, as well as with regard to questions of punishment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDiscussions about tribal criminal jurisdiction are peaking at the same time that the national conversation regarding the failed American criminal justice system has become cacophonous.
“Coincidentally, discussions about tribal criminal jurisdiction are peaking at the same time that the national conversation regarding the failed American criminal justice system has become cacophonous.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe argument that law enforcement in general is more effective when focused locally with significant community engagement is gaining ground in the United States.
“The argument that law enforcement in general is more effective when focused locally with significant community engagement is gaining ground in the United States.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [302]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThere is a timely synergy between Indian country criminal justice and the larger national conversation about criminal justice reform.
“In this sense, there is a timely synergy between Indian country criminal justice and the larger national conversation about criminal justice reform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationCriminal justice in Indian country is a national disgrace.
“The result, as the federal government itself concedes, is that criminal justice in Indian country is a “national disgrace.”288”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 2008 Hearing, supra note 84
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs a result, victims stop reporting crimes, refuse to participate in the criminal justice system, and opt out of community policing or local control altogether.
“As a result, victims stop reporting crimes, refuse to participate in the criminal justice system, and opt out of community policing or local control altogether.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningTribes are in a unique position to experience both ascension in sovereignty and a corresponding resistance to assimilation if they tread cautiously.
“In other words, tribes are in a unique position to experience both ascension in sovereignty and a corresponding resistance to assimilation if they tread cautiously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis means that more perpetrators commit repeat offenses that are never reported, thus starting the cycle over again.
“This, in turn, means that more perpetrators commit repeat offenses that are never reported, thus starting the cycle over again.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningEmpowering tribes to go blindly down the American criminal justice road without careful consideration is unlikely to lead to desirable results.
“Thus, empowering tribes to go blindly down this road without careful consideration is unlikely to lead to desirable results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe current American model of criminal justice responds to crime by ratcheting up sentences without corresponding treatments, services, and re-entry, creating an endless cycle that only leads to defeat.
“the current model of American criminal justice, in which the response to crime is to continue to ratchet up sentences without thinking about corresponding treatments, services, and re-entry, is an endless cycle that only leads to defeat.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe expansions represented by TLOA and VAWA are viewed in tribes as providing an opportunity to break the cycle of violence and hopelessness in Indian country.
“The expansions represented by TLOA and VAWA, respectively, are viewed in tribes as providing an opportunity to break the cycle of violence and hopelessness in Indian country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningCurrent available evidence demonstrates that tribes do, in fact, want expanded jurisdiction and authority because it suits the sovereign's prerogative theoretically as well as practically.
“Accordingly, current available evidence demonstrates that tribes do, in fact, want expanded jurisdiction and authority because it suits the sovereign's prerogative theoretically as well as practically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe deprivation of this right for tribes has been disastrous because of what it signals regarding the federal government's view of tribal sovereignty, and demoralizing for Indian people and Indian communities because the federal government has not picked up the mantle to fill the gaps.
“The deprivation of this right for tribes has not only been disastrous because of what it signals regarding the federal government's view of tribal sovereignty, it has been demoralizing for Indian people and Indian communities because the federal government has not picked up the mantle to fill the gaps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenTribal members assert that, even when they report crimes, and those crimes are prosecuted, they are devastated by a system that can only give one year per count for even the most heinous of crimes.
“Correspondingly, tribal members assert that, even when they report crimes, and those crimes are prosecuted, they are devastated by a system that can only give one year per count for even the most heinous of crimes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCriminal justice authority bolsters both internal and external legitimacy and respect, in addition to providing further support for the doctrinal features discussed previously.
“Criminal justice authority bolsters both internal and external legitimacy and respect, in addition to providing further support for the doctrinal features discussed previously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAs a report from the Indigenous Peoples Law and Policy Program at Michigan State University pointed out, because the programs are unfunded, the tribes that need them the most will not receive them.
“As a report from the Indigenous Peoples Law and Policy Program at Michigan State University pointed out, because the programs are unfunded, the tribes that need them the most will not receive them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [333]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe Commission concluded that the most important takeaway regarding punishment was to seek alternatives to incarceration when possible, finding that they should be the paramount objective in any plan to address the corrections aspect of public safety in Tribal nations.
“It concluded that the most important takeaway regarding punishment was to seek alternatives to incarceration when possible, finding that they “should 1564 (2016)be the paramount objective in any plan to address the corrections aspect of public safety in Tribal nations.”311”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [311]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTribal leaders have in the past opposed the idea of jury trials, the encouragement of defendants not to speak as to their own guilt or innocence, and an impartial judge with no knowledge of the case.
“Tribal leaders have in the past opposed the idea of jury trials, the encouragement of defendants not to speak as to their own guilt or innocence, and an impartial judge with no knowledge of the case, among others.320”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [320]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Commission noted that many Indian offenders are suffering the effects of poverty, isolation and substance abuse and that detention of Tribal members should be a rare exception in the corrections context.
“The Commission noted, as did many of the speakers and participants, that many Indian offenders “are suffering the effects of poverty, isolation and substance abuse” and that “[d]etention of Tribal members should be a rare exception in the corrections context.”312”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [312]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningHigh rates of alcohol consumption are linked to the experience of colonialism, which has produced a great deal of the misery and crime in Indian country.
“High rates of alcohol consumption are linked to the experience of colonialism, which has produced a great deal of the “misery and crime in Indian country.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe most salient critique of the tribe-centered model advocated through TLOA and VAWA is that it lets the federal government off the hook too easily.
“The most salient critique of the tribe-centered model that has been advocated through TLOA and VAWA is that it lets the federal government off the hook too easily.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe American Indian reservations with the worst crime problem are the same reservations that do not have the structural capacity to implement TLOA.
“As the report states, “The terrible irony of TLOA is that the American Indian reservations with the worst crime problem are the same reservations that do not have the structural capacity to implement the Act.”333”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [333]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIt is not acceptable or feasible to think that newly enacted federal laws can successfully hand off the burden of criminal justice to Indian tribes, particularly when the systems are wholly unfunded.
“It is not acceptable or feasible to think that newly enacted federal laws can successfully hand off the burden of criminal justice to Indian tribes, particularly when the systems are wholly unfunded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDrug and alcohol abuse has been notoriously high in Indian country historically, and it has been on the rise in recent years.
“Drug and alcohol abuse has been notoriously high in Indian country historically, and it has been on the rise in recent years.325”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [325]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNumerous provisions of the statutes are vague, and there are likely to be legal challenges on many fronts.
“Numerous provisions of the statutes are vague, and there are likely to be legal challenges on many fronts.339”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [339]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIntegrating tribal practices into criminal justice systems is not limited to the punishment phase of the proceedings; traditional methods of adjudicating claims also influence process.
“And integrating tribal practices into criminal justice systems is not limited to the punishment phase of the proceedings.In fact, traditional methods of adjudicating claims also influence process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCooperation among sovereigns is key to success and could be further encouraged and provided for through better training, funding, and federal oversight.
“Cooperation among sovereigns is key to success and could be further encouraged and provided for through better training, funding, and federal oversight.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAn additional cost that is almost certain to arise in some form is through litigation.
“An additional cost that is almost certain to arise in some form is through litigation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThese problems are unique in the way they play out in Indian country, but they are not unique to American Indian communities.
“These problems, of course, are unique in the way they play out in Indian country, but they are not unique to American Indian communities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationViolent felonies, including rape, sexual assault, child molestation, and domestic violence, are particularly cases best handled in an adversarial process where incarceration may be appropriate.
“This is particularly true of violent felonies, including rape, sexual assault, child molestation, and domestic violence.321”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [321]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenProcuring funding for programs that focus on juveniles would also serve at least to begin to break the cycle of substance abuse and the suicide crisis seen in reservation communities.
“Procuring funding for programs that focus on juveniles would also serve at least to begin to break the cycle of substance abuse and the suicide crisis seen in reservation communities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFrom all of this comes feelings of hopelessness, frustration, helplessness, and despair, all of which fuel drug and alcohol abuse and contribute to feelings of anger and, ultimately, violent behavior.
“From all of this comes feelings of hopelessness, frustration, helplessness, and despair-all of which fuel drug and alcohol abuse and contribute to feelings of anger and, ultimately, violent behavior.328”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [328]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIf the federal government were doing its part to protect Indian people, the kinds of laws that tribes have advocated for may not be necessary.
“If the federal government were doing its part to protect Indian people, the kinds of laws that tribes have advocated for may not be necessary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ILOC found that such approaches have worked well for decades, if not centuries, and hold tremendous promise for adjudicating more disputes at less cost and for determining sentences where, based on community norms and mores, the punishment fits the crime.
“As the ILOC found, “[s]uch approaches have worked well for decades, if not centuries, and hold tremendous promise for adjudicating more disputes at less cost and for determining sentences where, based on community norms and mores, the punishment fits the crime.”317”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [317]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIf VAWA is struck down, tribes will have to confront the possibility of putting a great deal of resources into a plan that may only be struck down by the Supreme Court in the next decade.
“If that is the case, tribes will have to confront the possibility of putting a great deal of resources into a plan that may only be struck down by the Supreme Court in the next decade.341”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [341]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere are similar reports that Nevada tribes have been questioned about their authority to arrest non-member Indians, an issue that already came before the Supreme Court and was definitively decided in United States v. Lara, upholding tribes' inherent authority to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all Indians within its territory, regardless of membership status.
“There are similar reports that Nevada tribes have been questioned about their authority to arrest non-member Indians, an issue that already came before the Supreme Court and was definitively decided in United States v. Lara, 349 upholding tribes' inherent authority to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all Indians within its territory, regardless of membership status.350”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [349]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [350]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIndian country is moving in the opposite direction from the national dialogue about reducing sentences and taking a different approach to policing.
“Ironically, in light of a national dialogue about reducing sentences and taking a different approach to policing, Indian country is moving in the opposite direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHundreds of tribes across the United States stand on the precipice of making critical choices about whether they will opt into the enhanced sentencing of TLOA, the expanded jurisdictional reach of VAWA, both, or neither, as well as how they will operationalize these changes.
“Today, hundreds of tribes across the United States stand on the precipice of making critical choices about whether they will opt into the enhanced sentencing of TLOA, the expanded jurisdictional reach of VAWA, both, or neither, as well as how they will operationalize these changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFailing to intervene means that abusers increase and escalate their attacks, which is quite common, particularly in domestic violence situations.
“Thus, failing to intervene means that abusers increase and escalate their attacks, which is quite common, particularly in domestic violence situations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [346]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThere is no granular data on TLOA prosecutions, and tribes have neither identified nor catalogued TLOA cases.
“There is no granular data on TLOA prosecutions, and the tribes have neither identified nor catalogued the TLOA cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe answers to these questions will impact fiscal and human resource allocation, law reform, institution building, and tribes' own exercise of sovereign authority that will touch the day-to-day lives of tribal members and those who come in contact with them.
“The answers to these questions will impact fiscal and human resource allocation, law reform, institution building, and tribes' own exercise of sovereign authority that will touch the day-to-day lives of tribal members and those who come in contact with them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAs an attorney for the tribe argued, this state of affairs leaves tribal police officers impotent and fearful of doing their jobs when they are at risk of prosecution.
“As an attorney for the tribe argued, this state of affairs leaves tribal police officers impotent and fearful of doing their jobs when they are at risk of prosecution.348”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [348]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAs Former Associate Attorney General Tom Perrelli testified before the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs prior to reauthorization of VAWA, tribal police are in an incredibly difficult position.
“But, as Former Associate Attorney General Tom Perrelli testified before the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs prior to reauthorization of VAWA, tribal police are in an incredibly difficult position.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [346]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe current system creates perverse incentives and encourages tribal police to ignore scenarios where they cannot confirm the race or membership of the perpetrator or assess the relationship between perpetrator and victim.
“The current system creates perverse incentives, and actually encourages tribal police to ignore scenarios in which they cannot confirm either the race or membership of the perpetrator or where they cannot assess in a potentially violent and dangerous scenario what the terms of the relationship are between the perpetrator and the victim(s).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLeaving arrest authority open disincentivizes individuals from becoming tribal police officers and creates a culture where tribal police are reluctant to respond to protect victims, even in exigent circumstances.
“First, it disincentivizes individuals from becoming tribal police officers and creates a culture where tribal police are reluctant to respond to protect victims, even in exigent circumstances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPerrelli refers to the beliefs of tribal police as mistaken, but the reality is that tribal officers' fears are not wholly unfounded.
“Perrelli refers to the beliefs of tribal police as “mistaken,” but the reality is that tribal officers' fears are not wholly unfounded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe analysis relies almost entirely on secondary sources.
“So the analysis relies almost entirely on secondary sources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Federal officials rarely live in Indian country and are seldom members of the reservation community.
“Federal officials rarely live in Indian country and are seldom members of the reservation community.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Protection of the people from crime is one of the core functions of government.
“Protection of the people from crime is one of the core functions of government.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Without safety, individuals cannot flourish, seek education or pursue other life goals.
“Without safety, individuals cannot flourish, seek education or pursue other life goals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The power to play a peacekeeping role within the community, which may include incarceration, is one of the key distinguishing features of a sovereign.
“The power to play a peacekeeping role within the community, which may include incarceration, is one of the key distinguishing features of a sovereign.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A central function of government is to keep citizens safe and to provide conditions sufficient for peace and prosperity.
“At the same time, a central function of government is to keep citizens safe and to provide conditions sufficient for peace and prosperity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The pilot project tribes' experiences are indicative of the broader impact of VAWA and TLOA despite the small sample size.
“However, even given the very small sample size available in this analysis, some preliminary evidence begins to paint at least a partial picture as to the impact that the statutes are having on the ground.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Poor communities of color bear the greatest burden of the failed American criminal justice system.
“Poor communities of color bear the greatest burden of this failed system.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Despite federal efforts at assimilation and intervention, tribes historically have employed alternative sentencing mechanisms when possible.
“Despite federal efforts at assimilation and intervention, tribes historically have employed alternative sentencing mechanisms when possible.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many American Indians in the criminal justice system, like many others in the state and federal systems, are there because of addiction.
“Many American Indians in the criminal justice system, like many others in the state and federal systems, are there because of addiction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Though communities vary, drug and alcohol addiction, and alcohol in particular, drives crime on the reservation.
“Though communities obviously vary, there is a general sense that drug and alcohol addiction-and alcohol, in particular-drives crime on the reservation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Bridge funding and pilot projects for federally funded imprisonment are finite and not guaranteed.
“There has been bridge funding and pilot projects for federally funded imprisonment, but they are finite and not guaranteed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The situation of criminal justice in Indian country is the result of decades of federal policy that has failed Native people.
“of criminal justice in Indian country is the result of decades of federal policy that has failed Native people.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The federal government is simply not available to cover the duties of local policing.
“The federal government is simply not available to cover the duties of local policing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are enormous costs to implementation of TLOA and VAWA in some cases.
“Though there are, in some cases, enormous costs to implementation of the two laws, ultimately each tribe will have to make decisions about how to move forward.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The federal government has abandoned Indian reservations in terms of providing basic policing services.
“Given all the ways in which the federal government has abandoned Indian reservations in terms of providing basic policing services, it is untenable that tribal police are sent on patrol without clear authority to arrest and detain without fear of prosecution themselves.”
Cites
Stories of Origin and Constitutional Possibilities
Ball, M. S. (1989) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1289305 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“Life Comes from It”: Navajo Justice Concepts
Yazzie, T. H. R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770804.009 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Myths and Realities of Tribal Sovereignty: The Law and Economics of Indian Self-RulePreprint
Kalt, J. P., & Singer, J. W. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.529084 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Rethinking Customary Law in Tribal Court Jurisprudence
Fletcher, M. L. M. (2007) · bepress Legal Repository · doi:10.17613/j5rwb-a7s04 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
A Proposal to the Hanodaganyas to Decolonize Federal Indian Control Law
Porter, R. (2025) · University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform · doi:10.36646/mjlr.31.4.proposal · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Kelly, P. A. O. (1999) · University of North Carolina School of Law Scholarship Repository (University of North Carolina Hospitals) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- See S. James Anaya, Indian Givers: What Indigenous Peoples Have Contributed to International Human Rights Law, 22 WASH. U. J.L. & POL'Y 107, 108 (2006) (describing the colonial vestiges of Western law and its impact on indigenous peoples). 269. See Clinton, Jurisdictional Maze, supra note 8. 270.
- See M. Brent Leonhard & Cisco Minthorn, A Comparison of State Low Level Felony Sentencing Authority, in Tribal Courts and the Administration of Justice in Indian Country: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on Indian Affairs, 110th Cong. 102-06 (2008) (examining how states have defined their lowest level felony to determine the appropriate maximum sentencing for tribes). 292. See, e.g., Robert N. Clinton, Redressing the Legacy of Conquest: A Vision Quest for a Decolonized Federal Indian Law, 46 ARK. L. REV. 77, 121 (1993);
- U.S. DEP'T OF JUSTICE & U.S. DEP'T OF INTERIOR, TRIBAL LAW AND ORDER ACT: LONG TERM PLAN TO BUILD AND ENHANCE TRIBAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS 10 (2011), https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/ files/tribal/legacy/2014/02/06/tloa-tsp-aug2011.pdf [https://perma.cc/7ZKS-SVRA]). 312. Id. 313. See Creel, supra note 68, at 357. 314. INDIAN LAW & ORDER COMM'N, supra note 9, at 133. 315. Id. 316. Id. 317. Id. 343. Duro v. Reina, 495 U.S. 676, 697 (1990). 344. See Letter From Jefferson Keel, President, Nat'l Cong. of Am. Indians, to Kevin Washburn, Assistant Sec'y for Indian Affairs, U.S. Dep't of Interior, and Hilary Tompkins, Solicitor, U.S. Dep't of Interior 1 (July 24, 2013), http://www.tribal-institute.org/download/VAWA/ NCAI%20Washburn-Tompkins%20letter_%20arrest%20authority_071013.pdf [https://perma. cc/S4Q8-YX8G] (requesting clarification on authority of tribal law enforcement to detain and arrest non-Indians). 345. See 160 CONG. REC. 26, S942 (Feb. 12, 2014). 346.
- see also TRIBAL LAW & POLICY INST., supra note 140, at 31-34 (discussing the types of defendants subject to Indian jurisdiction under VAWA). 354. See Tulalip Tribes, Press Release, VAWA 2013 and the Tulalip Tribes Jurisdiction Over Crimes of Domestic Violence, TULALIP TRIBES (Oct. 5, 2015), http://www.tulaliptribes- nsn.gov/Portals/0/pdf/departments/tribal_court/18380_VAWA_2013-v3_Minus_Story.pdf [https://perma.cc/2YEN-A5CL]; see also Congressional Briefing on the Impact of VAWA 2013 in Indian Country, INDIAN L. RES. CTR. (Feb. 22, 2011), http://indianlaw.org/safewomen/ congressional-briefing-impact-vawa-2013-indian-country [https://perma.cc/93GL-ZLT6] (quoting Peter Yucupicio as saying that "VAWA jurisdiction is still limited to certain crimes, does not protect victims of stranger rape, and does not protect children or other family members"). 355. NAT'L CONG. OF AM. INDIANS, supra note 30, at 8. 356. Id. at 26. 357. Tulalip Tribes, supra note 354.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aboriginal sovereignty, ‘crime’ and criminology
Porter, A. (2019) · Current Issues in Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/10345329.2018.1559747 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Notable examples of such work include work on Indigenous nation and jurisdiction rebuilding (Coulthard, 2014; Jorgensen, 2007; Riley, 2005, 2007, 2011, 2012, 2016, 2017; Simpson, 2014; Vivian et al., 2017), self-determination and the criminal justice context (Behrendt, Vivian, & Porter, 2017;…”
BackgroundNATIVE PEOPLE AND VIOLENT CRIME
Deer, S. (2018) · Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race · doi:10.1017/s1742058x18000012 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Seeking Justice: How VAWA Reduced the Stronghold Over American Indian and Alaska Native Women
Hartman, J. L. (2020) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801220949695 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Because of this maze, tribes have long been unable to prosecute non-Native perpetrators who commit crimes on tribal land (Riley, 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialJustice as Position, Justice as Practice: Indigenous Governance at the Boundary
Cornell, S. E. (2018) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-60645-7_2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Ascension of Indigenous Cultural Property Law
Riley, A. (2022) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.36644/mlr.121.1.ascension · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationSettler colonial law and the prison industrial complex
Porter, A., & Cunneen, C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108333641.007 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Criminal justice in Indian country: Examining declination rates of tribal cases
Branton, R., King, K., & Walsh, J. (2022) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13100 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Policing Native American Lands in the United States
Morin, R. P., & Morin, C. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19182-5_11 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
US Attorney Declination Rates of Tribal Cases: Resources Matter!
Branton, R. (2025) · The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics · doi:10.1017/rep.2025.34
Master List of Additional Resources
Christensen, G., & Tatum, M. L. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108770804.025
Singh, P., & Yadav, V. (2024) · International Annals of Criminology · doi:10.1017/cri.2024.18
“” Miranda v. Arizona (1966), US Supreme Court Adversarial System and Judicial Role The Indian legal system is largely based on an adversarial approach coupled with the statutory laws, wherein the State ’ s prosecution opposes the accused (Riley 2016).”
Fay, A., Galoob, S., Thomas, W. R., & Zhang, J. Y. (2026) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7198138
- Authors
- RIley, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- RIley, Angela R.
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2017-05-11
- OpenAlex
- W2514905684
- Semantic Scholar
- 845d52c5e0b4f18c14b1707eed2f86beb6b8c8b5
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Locations
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- LawArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Keywords
- tribal criminal jurisdiction, tribal sovereignty, self-determination (international law), Indian Country, tribal courts, assimilation, Indian reservations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review