Allostasis, interoception, and the free energy principle: feeling our way forward.
Open accessAbstract
Interoceptive processing is commonly understood in terms of the monitoring and representation of the body’s current physiological (i.e. homeostatic) status, with aversive sensory experiences encoding some impending threat to tissue viability. However, claims that homeostasis fails to fully account for the sophisticated regulatory dynamics observed in complex organisms have led some theorists to incorporate predictive (i.e. allostatic) regulatory mechanisms within broader accounts of interoceptive processing. Critically, these frameworks invoke diverse – and potentially mutually inconsistent – interpretations of the role allostasis plays in the scheme of biological regulation. We argue in favour of a moderate, reconciliatory position in which homeostasis and allostasis are conceived as equally vital (but functionally distinct) modes of physiological control. We explore the implications of this interpretation for free energy-based accounts of interoceptive inference, advocating a similarly complementary (and hierarchical) view of homeostatic and allostatic processing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some variables representing body state are monitored in relation to their departure from a level predicted as optimal in context.
“some variables representing body state are monitored not only in relation to a homeostatic set point, but also in relation to their departure from a level predicted as optimal in context”
From Pain Asymbolia as Depersonalization for Pain Experience. An Interoceptive Active Inference Account (2020) · cites this paper as Corcoran and Hohwy, 2017
Cites
The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?
Friston, K. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2787 · Cited by 8,120 · see citing works
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924 · see citing works
Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain
McEwen, B. S. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2006 · Cited by 4,981 · see citing works
Organization for physiological homeostasis
Cannon, W. B. (1929) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1929.9.3.399 · Cited by 1,844 · see citing works
Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self
Seth, A. K. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007 · Cited by 1,816 · see citing works
Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap.
Khalsa, S. S., Adolphs, R., Cameron, O. G., Critchley, H. D., Davenport, P. W., Feinstein, J. S., Feusner, J. D., Garfinkel, S. N., Lane, R. D., Mehling, W. E., et al. (2018) · Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.004 · Cited by 1,453 · see citing works
The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization
Barrett, L. F. (2017) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsx060 · Cited by 950 · see citing works
Active interoceptive inference and the emotional brain
Seth, A. K., & Friston, K. J. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0007 · Cited by 945 · see citing works
Uncertainty and stress: Why it causes diseases and how it is mastered by the brain
Peters, A., McEwen, B. S., & Friston, K. (2017) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.05.004 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control
Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F., & Friston, K. (2015) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.001 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
An active inference theory of allostasis and interoception in depression
Barrett, L. F., Quigley, K. S., & Hamilton, P. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0011 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
The hierarchical basis of neurovisceral integration
Smith, R., Thayer, J. F., Khalsa, S. S., & Lane, R. D. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.003 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression
Stephan, K. E., Manjaly, Z. M., Mathys, C. D., Weber, L. A. E., Paliwal, S., Gard, T., Tittgemeyer, M., Fleming, S. M., Haker, H., Seth, A. K., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00550 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Allostasis, amygdala, and anticipatory angst
Schulkin, J., McEwen, B. S., & Gold, P. W. (1994) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/0149-7634(94)90051-5 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Sterling, P. (2004) · Allostasis, Homeostasis, and the Costs of Physiological Adaptation · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316257081.004 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
The anatomy of choice: dopamine and decision-making.
Friston, K., Schwartenbeck, P., FitzGerald, T., Moutoussis, M., Behrens, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0481 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Redefining the role of limbic areas in cortical processing
Chanes, L., & Barrett, L. F. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.11.005 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predictive processing as a systematic basis for identifying the neural correlates of consciousness
Hohwy, J., & Seth, A. (2020) · Philosophy and the Mind Sciences · doi:10.33735/phimisci.2020.ii.64 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Self-citationExpecting some action: predictive processing and the construction of conscious experience
Nave, K., Deane, G., Miller, M., & Clark, A. (2022) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-022-00644-y · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Pain Asymbolia as Depersonalization for Pain Experience. An Interoceptive Active Inference Account
Gerrans, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.523710 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Falandays, J. B., Yoshimi, J., Warren, W. H., & Spivey, M. J. (2024) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-023-09988-2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Corcoran, A. W., & Hohwy, J.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Publisher
- California Digital Library (CDL)
- Published
- 2017-10-27
- OpenAlex
- W4254516896
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- allostasis, homeostasis, interoception, free energy principle, interoceptive inference, physiological regulation, hierarchical regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review