PreprintCited by 20Crime, Deviance, and Social ControlSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGender, Feminism, and Media

Sexualization of Children in Deepfakes and Hentai: Examining Reddit User Views

Open access
Eelmaa, Simone·2021·Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

Abstract

Based on a large dataset (N=13293) of Reddit comments collected on the topic, this article takes a qualitative approach to examine Reddit users’ views and attitudes about the sexualization of minors (SOM) in deepfakes and hentai. The analysis captured five major themes in the discussion over SOM: illegality, art, promoting pedophilia, increase in offending and general harmfulness. Furthermore, the discussion was underscored by the central question of who is a minor, which feeds the already problematic definitional ambiguity and keeps the perceived discursive boundaries of the illegality of SOM in flux. Current study adds to the existing literature by presenting information that could be useful in designing prevention and awareness efforts addressing SOM and CSAM, particularly to the general public.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31235/osf.io/6wuhj

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. ICMEC (2018) Child sexual abuse material: model legislation & global review. 9th ed. International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (ICMEC). Available online at <https://www.icmec. org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/CSAM-Model-Law-9th-Ed-FINAL-12-3-18.pdf>. Accessed on 12 March, 2022.
  2. Porn Hub (2019) The 2019 year in review. Available online at <https://www.pornhub.com/insights/2019- year-in-review>. Accessed on 12 March, 2022.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eelmaa, S.
Affiliations
University of Tartu (EE)
Corresponding author
Eelmaa, Simone
Venue
Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2021-03-25
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
229-248
ISSN
1406-0922 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285288431
Cited by
20
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Eesti Teadusagentuur (PRG700)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
deepfakes, hentai, child pornography, Reddit comments, online pornography, pedophilia, user attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review