Cited by 63Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies

The implicit theories of child sexual exploitation material users: An initial conceptualization

Open access
Bartels, Ross M., Merdian, Hannah L.·2016·Aggression and Violent Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.avb.2015.11.002

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CSAM offenders who consume abusive material have belief systems that minimize harm rather than explicitly endorse abuse, allowing them to justify continued engagement.

    “Research on CSAM offenders suggests that those who consume abusive material have belief systems that minimize harm rather than explicitly endorse abuse, allowing them to justify continued engagement (Bartels and Merdian 2016).”

    From AI-generated child sexual abuse material: what’s the harm? (2026) · cites this paper as Bartels and Merdian 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartels, R. M., & Merdian, H. L.
Affiliations
University of Lincoln (GB)
Corresponding author
Bartels, Ross M.
Venue
Aggression and Violent Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
26
Pages
16-25
ISSN
1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177047444
Cited by
62
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Keywords
child sexual exploitation material, mindset, core beliefs, conceptualization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review