PreprintCited by 3Digitalization, Law, and RegulationArtificial Intelligence in LawEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Global competition and convergence of AI Law

Hildebrandt, Mireille·2022

Abstract

This paper is a draft entry for an encyclopedia. It aims to provide an overview rather than an in-depth discussion. To begin with, we need to come to terms with the question of what is meant with AI, avoiding both over- and underinclusive definitions. In section II, I first explore the definitional conundrum within the research domain of AI, followed by an account of how various public bodies that prepare AI legislation aim to define the scope of their object. In section III, I provide a brief overview of the different approaches to dedicated AI legislation by the OECD, the US, China and the EU. Finally, in section IV, I discuss the Brussels effect of the EU’s AI Act that may diffuse the EU approach across a variety of jurisdictions whose corporations wish to compete on the internal market of the EU.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31235/osf.io/j36ke

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hildebrandt, M.
Corresponding author
Hildebrandt, Mireille
Published
2022-02-10
OpenAlex
W4213327815
Cited by
3
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence law, AI legislation, definition of artificial intelligence, AI regulation, United States AI policy, EU AI Act, Brussels effect, regulatory convergence, internal market

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review